Articles From Julia Kaye Wykoff

Editors’ Column By Mark Kevin Wykoff, Sr. & Julia Kaye Wykoff Criminal Justice, November 2023 An introductory note from the co-editors.
Pretrial Fairness Act in Appellate Practice By Julia Kaye Wykoff Criminal Justice, August 2023 An overview of Pretrial Fairness Act appeals.
1 comment (Most recent August 15, 2023)
2023 Spring Criminal Legislation By Julia Kaye Wykoff & Mark Kevin Wykoff, Sr. Criminal Justice, May 2023 Summaries of recent legislation of interest.
Pre-Trial Fairness Act: Elimination of Cash Bail Held in Abeyance By Julia Kaye Wykoff Criminal Justice, February 2023 The most controversial component of the Pretrial Fairness Act, eliminating cash bail, was scheduled to become effective on January 1, 2023—however, it was declared unconstitutional in the weeks leading up to the effective date.
The Changing Landscape of Juvenile Offenders & Armed Habitual Criminal By Daniel L. Fultz & Julia Kaye Wykoff Criminal Justice, December 2022 Recently, the Illinois Supreme Court addressed whether a juvenile’s conviction constitutes a qualifying offense for purposes of Class X sentencing under section 5-4.5-95(b) of the Unified Code of Corrections.
Evaluating Structural Error following People v. Jackson, 2022 IL 127256 By Julia Kaye Wykoff Criminal Justice, November 2022 In People v. Jackson, the Illinois Supreme Court considered whether the trial court’s error in polling only 11 of 12 jurors constituted “structural error” for purposes of applying the second prong of Illinois’s plain error rule.
Practice Pointer: Is a Jury Trial Waiver Irrevocable in All Circumstances? Not Always. By Mark Kevin Wykoff, Julia Kaye Wykoff, & Daniel Fultz Criminal Justice, November 2022 In People v. Bracey, the defendant argued before the appellate court that his jury waiver, executed prior to his first trial, was not valid with respect to his second trial.
Casenote: People v. Johnson By Mark Kevin Wykoff & Julia Kaye Wykoff Criminal Justice, April 2022 In People v. Johnson, the Illinois Supreme Court considered whether defense counsel’s failure to seek the testing of a potentially exculpatory DNA sample constituted the ineffective assistance of counsel.
People v. Sophanavog: Waivers at Plea and the Ripple Effect By Mark Kevin Wykoff, Sr. & Julia Kaye Wykoff Criminal Justice, December 2020 In August, the Illinois Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. Sophanavong, where the court considered whether a circuit court’s failure to strictly comply with the requirements of section 5-3-1 of the Unified Code of Corrections to forgo a presentence investigation report requires remand for a new sentencing hearing or whether a defendant can waive the issue by pleading guilty as well as forfeit the claim by failing to raise it in a post-plea motion.
Case Note: People v. Morger By Mark Kevin Wykoff & Julia Kaye Wykoff Criminal Justice, April 2020 In People v. Morger, the Illinois Supreme Court considered whether a “complete ban on accessing ‘social networking websites’ as a condition of probation is unreasonable and unconstitutional under the First Amendment.”
Case Note: People v. Peterson By Mark Kevin Wykoff, Sr. & Julia Kaye Wykoff Criminal Justice, November 2019 The Illinois Supreme Court affirmed the lower court's first-degree murder conviction and sentence in People v. Peterson.
SORA on appeal after People v. Bingham By Julia Kaye Wykoff & Mark Kevin Wykoff Criminal Justice, February 2019 The Illinois Supreme Court recently considered the constitutionality of the Sex Offender Registration Act in People v. Bingham.
People v. Castleberry: The death of the void-sentence rule By Mark Kevin Wykoff & Julia Kaye Wykoff Criminal Justice, April 2017 People v. Castleberry has changed the landscape for purposes of raising and preserving issues in higher courts—all members of the criminal bar must be mindful of this new precedent and govern their advocacy accordingly.
Women in conflict—A UN response By Cindy G. Buys & Julia Kaye Wykoff International and Immigration Law, June 2014 Rather than conventional war tools such as guns, tanks, and bombs, raping and abusing women seemingly became a favorite tactic in many war-torn countries.
Women in conflict—A UN response By Cindy G. Buys & Julia Kaye Wykoff Women and the Law, April 2014 Rather than conventional war tools such as guns, tanks, and bombs, raping and abusing women seemingly became a favorite tactic in many war-torn countries.

Spot an error in your article? Contact Sara Anderson at sanderson@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article,visit the ISBA Newsletters page.

Select a Different Author