InsideAdministrative Law, June 2001This issue of the newsletter features three articles. Section council member Bernard Paul analyzes recent cases dealing with the vexing question of whether an administrative review action may be joined in one court proceeding with a non-administrative review claim.
A primer for appeals to the Property Tax Appeal BoardBy Terry ShaferAdministrative Law, June 2001The intent of this article is to give new attorneys or attorneys new to practice before a state agency a procedural path to follow in order to fully and knowledgeably represent a client in this particular agency's forum.
Exhaustion of issues in agency hearingsBy Leon FoxAdministrative Law, March 2001We are all familiar with the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies before judicial review is permitted.
Minutes of recent section council meetingsAdministrative Law, March 2001Guest speaker Fred Dickson of the Trust and Estates Section spoke in favor of the proposal for a certification program with respect to estate planning, trust and probate lawyers.
Sovereign immunity bars nursing homes from raising counterclaims against overpayments made to the stateBy Leon FoxAdministrative Law, March 2001A recent Illinois Appellate Court case has dealt a fatal blow to healthcare vendors seeking a set off of underpayments against overpayments made to the Illinois Department of Public Aid. In Alden Nursing Center-Lakeland, Inc. v. Patla, 317 Ill. App. 3d 1 (1st Dist. 2000), the court concluded that the Court of Claims has exclusive jurisdiction over counterclaims for money damages against the State of Illinois.
Upcoming administrative law seminarAdministrative Law, March 2001On May 4, 2001, a comprehensive, all day seminar will be presented at the ISBA's Chicago Regional Office. The program tentatively will include the following important subjects and knowledgeable speakers:
An annual survey of administrative law 2000By William A. Price & Kelley BeehnerAdministrative Law, January 2001"Administrative law" concerns the policy making, ratemaking, decision making, rulemaking, licensing and other requirements and procedures of administrative bodies.
Case law developmentsAdministrative Law, January 2001In January of 1998, the Cook County Collector, Maria Pappas, conducted the annual tax sale of properties which were tax delinquent for 1996.
Coming soon: Annotated Illinois Administrative CodeAdministrative Law, January 2001Professor Laura Wendt, Southern Illinois School of Law, has digested over 1000 cases interpreting Illinois administrative rules for construction of an electronic research system.
Statutory developmentsBy Kelley BeehnerAdministrative Law, January 2001The Open Meetings Act (5 ILCS 120) was amended by two Public Acts. Section 1.02 concerning the definition of "meeting" was revised to clarify that a "public body" consists of "members" rather than "commissioners," as well as to include the "Health Facilities Planning Board" as part of a public body. (P.A. 91-782, effective June 9, 2000). [www.ilga.gov/publicacts/pubact91/acts/91-0782.html]
Administrative law on the Net 2000By Jean M. WegnerAdministrative Law, October 2000This article highlights a selection of free, web-based resources for the administrative law practitioner.
Recent decision—an appeal or not an appeal: that is the questionBy Amy M. WatrobaAdministrative Law, October 2000The last issue of this newsletter included a discussion of AT & T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 86 F. Supp. 932 (W.D. Mo. 1999), where a Federal District court reviewed de novo a state administrative agency decision.
Demographics of the Administrative Law SectionAdministrative Law, August 2000The section is composed of a geographically diverse group of attorneys. There were 482 section members as of May 2000, a 15% increase since the first of the year.
Ethics and professionalism for government attorneys and the administrative judiciaryAdministrative Law, August 2000On June 1, 2000, the Government Bar Association and the Illinois Association of Administrative Law Judges sponsored a program with the above title. Co-sponsors were the Illinois Chapter of the American Judicature Society, the Administrative Law and Administrative Law Judges Committees of the Chicago Bar Association, the ISBA Administrative Law Section, and the ISBA Committee on Government Lawyers.
Federal court review of state administrative agency decisionsAdministrative Law, August 2000In August 1999, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri issued a lengthy opinion in AT&T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 86 F. Supp. 932.
Meeting of the section council on February 18, 2000Administrative Law, August 2000Former section council member Stephen Rotello, an Assistant Illinois Attorney General, discussed with the council the results of an AG survey addressing compliance with the Freedom of Information Act.
Recent decisionsBy Meghan HubbardAdministrative Law, August 2000An agency's unpublished interpretive opinions do not require notice and comment; an agency's erroneous decision in four cases does not estop the agency from making a different decision in a substantially similar fifth case.
Remand for presentation of new evidenceAdministrative Law, August 2000Morelli, a Will County deputy sheriff, was terminated by the Sheriff's Office Merit Commission after he was charged with conduct unbecoming an officer and other offenses.
Administrative agency is without jurisdiction to determine the constitutionality of a statuteAdministrative Law, July 2000A recent opinion of the First District Illinois Appellate Court, Board of Education of Rich Township High School District No. 227 v. Brown, 724 N.E.2d 956 (Ill. App. Ct., 1st Dist., Feb. 29, 2000), involves numerous interesting legal issues. Some are explored at length in the court's opinion, and others are barely mentioned.
The A, B, and C of an ALJ decision: Gilchrist v. Human Rights Commission, No.1-99-1054, decided March 27, 2000By J.A. SebastianAdministrative Law, July 2000In Gilchrist v. Human Rights Commission, the First District Appellate Court held, sua sponte, that the Illinois Human Rights Commission (the "Commission") exceeded its statutory authority when it (1) entered an order that allowed an administrative law judge ("ALJ") to issue a written decision on a matter that the ALJ had not personally presided over, and (2) accepted, in its entirety, the "recommended order and decision" of that ALJ.
Citizens Organizing Project v. Department of Natural Resources: Supremes define reasonable litigation expense when administrative rule is invalidatedBy Robert T. LawleyAdministrative Law, July 2000In the recently decided case of Citizens Organizing Project v. Department of Natural Resources, 189 Ill. 2d 593, __N.E. 2d __, __ Ill. Dec. __, 2000 WL 46033 (Jan. 21, 2000) (No. 86878), rehearing denied (Apr. 3, 2000), the Illinois Supreme Court broadly interpreted section 10-55(c) of the Administrative Procedure Act, ruling that a party who causes an administrative rule to be invalidated by a court is entitled to all of the party's reasonable litigation expenses incurred throughout the action.
InsideAdministrative Law, July 2000This issue commences with Bob Lawley's interesting article concerning a recent Illinois Supreme Court case which liberalizes the rules applicable to a petition for reimbursement of litigation expenses filed by a private party whose lawsuit results in invalidation of an administrative rule.
Pollution control board proposes new procedural rulesBy Claire A. ManningAdministrative Law, July 2000The Illinois Pollution Control Board (Board) adjudicates environmental cases and adopts environmental standards and regulations for the State of Illinois.
Applicability of Fourth Amendment to administrative hearing evidenceBy Paul E. FreehlingEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, May 2000On October 28, 1999, Judge Robert Boharik of the Circuit Court of Cook County issued a written memorandum order in Isa Bros., Inc. v. City of Chicago, No. 98 CH 17389.
Courts must liberally construe statutes granting a right to appealAdministrative Law, May 2000Less than six months after Carver, a four to three supreme court held that an administrative review proceeding could not be dismissed merely because of a technical error in seeking the issuance of summons.