Can a single strand of beads hanging from the rearview mirror form the basis for a legitimate traffic stop?By J. Brick Van Der SnickTraffic Laws and Courts, March 2007In People v. Ronald Cole, the Illinois Appellate Court for the Fourth District held that a single strand of beads hanging from a defendant’s rearview mirror, without materially obstructing the defendant’s view, could not form a legitimate basis for a traffic stop of the defendant.
Case summaryBy David B. FranksTraffic Laws and Courts, March 2007On August 18, 2002 the Defendant, Catherine Sturgess, was arrested and charged with driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) and failure to reduce speed to avoid an accident.
New law abolishes judicial driving permitsBy Edward M. MaloneyTraffic Laws and Courts, March 2007Recently, MADD, AAIM and other support groups came to the conclusion that the increased use of BAIID or SCRAM devices would reduce the DUI recidivist rate.
Recent cases and cases of interestBy James J. Ahern & Thomas M. MoranTraffic Laws and Courts, March 2007In People v. Brady, No. 02-04-1281, ___ Ill.App.2d ___, ___ N.E.2d ___, ___ Ill.Dec. ___ (2nd Dist. 2007), Defendant was charged with leaving the scene of a motor vehicle accident involving death of a person, aggravated reckless driving and drag racing.
The saga of admissibility of vehicular post-collision photographs continuesBy Stephen C. BuserCivil Practice and Procedure, March 2007The First District Appellate Court decided nearly four years ago in Dicosola v. Bowman, 342 Ill.App. 3d 530, 794 N.E. 2d 875, 276 Ill.Dec.625 (1st Dist. 2003) that vehicular post-collision photographs were not admissible in automobile accident litigation absent expert testimony.
Recent traffic cases and cases of interestBy James J. AhernTraffic Laws and Courts, January 2006Probable cause exists when the facts known to the officer at the time of the arrest are sufficient to lead a reasonably cautious person to believe that the person arrested has committed a crime.
Recent casesBy James J. Ahern & Thomas M. MoranTraffic Laws and Courts, October 2005Recent traffic cases and cases of interest.
Terry stops: the riddle of Fourth and Fifth Amendment jurisprudenceBy Patrick M. KinnallyGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, September 2004Benny Bogain has come to see you. Over the years, he has experienced a few problems with local law enforcement officers. A DUI, a battery charge, and most recently a minor ordinance violation for possessing a 12-pack in Lincoln Park.
Gumma v. White-Application of the Doctrine of Collateral Estoppel in summary suspension proceedingsBy Larry A. DavisTraffic Laws and Courts, April 2004Since the Supreme Court's decision in People v. Moore, 138 Ill.2d 162, 149 Ill.Dec.278, 561 N.E.2d 648 (1990), the courts have consistently held that the doctrine of collateral estoppel cannot be applied to bar re-litigation of an issue determined at a summary suspension hearing in the subsequent criminal DUI proceeding.
Recent casesBy Thomas M. Moran & James J. AhernTraffic Laws and Courts, April 2004A police officer has authority to stop a vehicle when the driver remains at a standstill for 20 seconds after the traffic control signal turns green. In People v. Kelly, No. #2-02-0274, ___ Ill.App.3d ___, 802 N.E.2d 850, 280 Ill.Dec. 599 (2d Dist. 2003), after the officer observed the defendant's vehicle remain stopped at an intersection for approximately 20 seconds after the light turned green.
People v. HannaBy Edward M. MaloneyTraffic Laws and Courts, January 2004In a blistering rebuff, the Illinois Supreme Court has reversed an Illinois Appellate Court decision that had required the Illinois Department of Public Health to follow its own rules and regulations.
Review of important new traffic laws of the 93rd General AssemblyBy Edward M. MaloneyTraffic Laws and Courts, January 2004Amends the Illinois Vehicle Code, Increases the penalty for fleeing or attempting to elude a peace officer from a Class A misdemeanor to a Class 4 felony.
The highway commissionerBy John W. FoltzMineral Law, December 2003On the whole, the powers of the highway commissioner are both broad and wholly discretionary and as many who have practiced in this area have discovered, relatively unfettered.
The highway commissionerBy John W. FoltzAgricultural Law, September 2003The following is condensed from materials presented by John W. Foltz at the ISBA's Agricultural Law Seminar sponsored by the Agricultural Law Section Counsel.
Driving below the posted speed limit as the basis for stopping a vehicleBy J. Brick Van Der SnickTraffic Laws and Courts, May 2003In an interesting decision (and not uncommon situation confronted by defense counsel) the Second Appellate District has issued a decision in a case where the officer stopped the vehicle for traveling below the posted speed limit. People v. Karen Isaac, 2-01-0660, (filed December 4, 2002).
Recent casesBy James J. AhernTraffic Laws and Courts, May 2003Three days following the defendant's arrest, he moved the court to preserve all transmissions by the Prospect Heights Police Communications Section for a period of 11/2 hours before his arrest, which occurred at 7:25 p.m. and for 21/2 hours after his arrest.