Chairman Mitch Weisz interviewBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, November 2011Learn more about the various procedural and substantive changes that have come about as a result of the workers’ compensation reform signed by Governor Quinn on June 28, 2011.
Involuntary merger of 8(e) specific loss into 8(d)1 wage differential awardBy Brad E. BleakneyWorkers’ Compensation Law, November 2011Even where there is competent medical evidence presented of a full duty return to work accompanied by a medical opinion stating that the condition of ill being was in fact permanent and causally related to the first date of accident, it may not be enough to sustain a separate award for specific loss under 8(e) where there is a finding of subsequent, intervening accidents to the same part of the body that subsequently resulted in a wage a reduction.
Returning to the course of employmentBy Noah A. FrankWorkers’ Compensation Law, November 2011Employers who have policies regarding personal deviations should enforce those policies. A pattern and practice of discipline demonstrates that policy violation is not tolerated, and that the employee has removed himself from the sphere of employment.
Editor’s notesBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, August 2011News updates of interest to workers' compensation lawyers, from editor Rich Hannigan.
Summary of workers’ compensation legislationBy Darrell WidenAdministrative Law, August 2011A summary of the major provisions of the recently passed Workers' Compensation reform legislation.
Who has jurisdiction over workers’ compensation fraud?By Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, August 2011Because the petitioner’s case involved questions of fact and not law, the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to hear the fraud complaint and found that the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission is the proper jurisdiction.
How to avoid the “penalty box”By Christine M. OryWorkers’ Compensation Law, June 2011Respondents can be tagged for penalties under Sections 19k, 19l and attorneys’ fees under 16 if they do not have justification for delaying or denying benefits. To defeat penalties, respondents must put forth a legitimate dispute.
New limitation applied to recovery of medical payments under Section 8(a)By Arnold G. Rubin & Catherine Krenz DoanWorkers’ Compensation Law, June 2011Tower Automotive v. Illinois Workers Compensation Commission is an extremely significant case, and will have a significant impact on those claims for medical benefits prior to February 1, 2006, the effective date of the amendment to Section 8(a) in 2005. 820 ILCS 305/8(a).
Wage differentials: Is it all just speculation?By Carol A. HartlineWorkers’ Compensation Law, June 2011A look at the recent case of United Airlines v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n, which addressed what could be allowed in as evidence to determine an 8(d)(1) award.
Warning! Section 12 may be hazardous to your health and not compensable under the ActBy William R. GallagherWorkers’ Compensation Law, June 2011The recent case of Menard v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission appears to determine that an injury in connection with a Section 12 examination is not compensable. However, a careful reading of that case indicates that it may not be the final adjudication of this issue.
Editor’s notesBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, February 2011An introduction to the issue from Editor Richard D. Hannigan.
Jeffrey Cox v. The Illinois Workers’ Compensation CommissionBy Rita E. MulcahyWorkers’ Compensation Law, February 2011The First District Appellate Court ruled that an injury that occurs while a traveling employee, driving a company vehicle, is in the process of returning to his route home arises out of and in the course of employment.
Workers’ Compensation Reform in the December 2010 veto sessionBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, February 2011A summary of the recent discussions within the Illinois House and Senate Committee meetings on Workers' Compensation Reform.
Editor’s notesBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, December 2010What's new in workers' compensation law.
John Adams. Who is he and why should I get to know him?By Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, December 2010John Adams is the person behind the minimum continuing legal education seminars that are presented by the ISBA twice a year.
Peter Corti reports on certification/specialization of workers’ compensation attorneysBy Peter Corti & Brad E. BleakneyWorkers’ Compensation Law, December 2010The Workers' Compensation Section's notes on the status of the issue of certification of a workers’ compensation attorney verses a designation by the ISBA that an attorney “specializes” in workers’ compensation.
A procedural look at the exclusive remedy defenseBy Kingshuk K. RoyWorkers’ Compensation Law, December 2010A brief overview of the exclusive remedy defense and examination of its procedural application in light of Reed v. White.
Appeals from the Commission to the Circuit Court—A potential procedural minefieldBy William R. Gallagher & Harry J. NicholsWorkers’ Compensation Law, September 2010The Esquivel v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission decision teaches that when an appeal is taken from the Commission to the Circuit Court you must make absolutely certain that you (1) tender payment of the probable cost of the record to the Commission and (2) file either the receipt or the affidavit of payment with the Circuit Court at the time you file the request for summons.
How not to terminate permanent total disability benefitsBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, September 2010A respondent is not entitled to review the employee’s tax returns as part of its petition for modification.
How to calculate average weekly wage of current employer in an 8(d)1 situationBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, September 2010Section 10 of the Workers' Compensation Act explicitly states that overtime is excluded from the calculation of average weekly wage unless overtime is mandatory or worked on a regular basis.
How to obtain medical records in light of Holtkamp v. ClaytonBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, September 2010The appellate court in Holtkamp Trucking Co. v. David J. Fletcher, M.D., L.L.C., d/b/a Safeworks Illinois found that the paper that the medical records are on and the ink that is used to create the medical records are the property of the medical provider. To command the medical provider to mail medical records to the injured worker would be a confiscation of the medical provider’s property.
A procedural look at the exclusive remedy defenseBy Kingshuk K. RoyTort Law, September 2010A brief overview of the exclusive remedy defense and its procedural application in light of the recent Fifth District decision of Reed v. White.
The right to control an individual’s actions is the most important factor in employer/employee relationshipBy Michelle D. PorroWorkers’ Compensation Law, September 2010In Agnes Skzubel v. IWCC, the appellate court determined that Ms. Skzubel qualified as an employee despite the fact that she could not legally be hired at the time she began her employment, and that the checks were written to her husband for the work she performed.