ADR and Mediation

Bankers Life & Casualty Ins. Co. v. CBRE, Inc.

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
Arbitration
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 15-1471
Decision Date: 
July 29, 2016
Federal District: 
N.D. Ill., E. Div.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded

Dist. Ct. erred in rejecting plaintiff’s challenge to arbitration award in favor of defendant in dispute regarding whether defendant violated terms of listing agreement calling for defendant to assist plaintiff in negotiating sublease of its office space, as well as finding plaintiff substitute office space. Record showed that plaintiff was unwilling to sublease its office space and move elsewhere unless it netted $7 million during said process, and defendant responded by presenting plaintiff with series of cost-benefits analyses (CBA) with respect to proposed properties, one of which included proposed net savings to plaintiff of $6.9 million that plaintiff accepted. However, when plaintiff later discovered that defendant had failed to include $3.1 million tenant improvement allowance for sublessee in relevant CBA that resulted in plaintiff only obtaining $3.8 net savings, plaintiff sued defendant for $3.1 million plus vacatur of $4.5 million in commissions that defendant had received during relocation process. Arbitration panel found that although defendant had made material “mistake” in failing to include tenant improvement allowance in CBA, plaintiff could obtain no relief where CBA contained disclaimer with respect to any errors contained therein. Ct. of Appeals, though, found that arbitration panel exceeded its authority in issuing award in favor of defendant, since panel was limited to construing listing agreement, and thus its reliance on CBA was unjustified. (Dissent filed.)

MHR Estate Plan, LLC v. K&G Partnership

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Arbitration
Citation
Case Number: 
2016 IL App (3d) 150744
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, July 26, 2016
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Will Co.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
O'BRIEN

Respondent, an Illinois general partnership, entered into a restated partnership agreement for purpose of continued development of a mobile home park. That trust, and two other trusts, and their trustees, were named as respondents in action to dissolve original partnership and appoint a receiver. Complaint alleged breaches of partnership agreement. Court erred in denying Respondents' motion to dismiss. Arbitration clause in partnership agreement was broad, providing that all disputes arising under agreement were subject to arbitration. As dissolution and liquidation provisions were in dispute, under broad arbitration clause, those issues were subject to arbitration, or at least reasonably in doubt, so that arbitrators should have determined meaning of arbitration clause.(SCHMIDT and WRIGHT, concurring.) 

International Association of Firefighters Local 49 v. The City of Bloomington

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Arbitration
Citation
Case Number: 
2016 IL App (4th) 150573
Decision Date: 
Friday, July 1, 2016
District: 
4th Dist.
Division/County: 
McLean Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
STEIGMANN

Union and City were unable to agree on extent to which City would continue to pay retiring Union members for their unused sick leave; parties referred issue to mandatory arbitration. Arbitrator then entered written order adopting City's final proposal. Court entered written order granting City's motion for summary judgment, upon Union petitioning for review of arbitrator's decision.Arbitrator had duty to consider interests and welfare of public and financial ability of City to meet costs, which include City's pension obligations. Section 14(h) of Illinois Public Relations Act required arbitrator to consider pension funding as part of City's broader financial landscape. Section 14(k) of Act allows an award of interest only if court has found a party's appeal frivolous; it does not allow award of interest to losing party on appeal. (KNECHT and HOLDER WHITE, concurring.)

The Wheaton Firefighters Union v. The Illinois Labor Relations Board

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Arbitration
Citation
Case Number: 
2016 IL App (2d) 160105
Decision Date: 
Wednesday, June 22, 2016
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
ILRB
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
SCHOSTOCK

During interest arbitration proceedings, City sought to add a provision to its agreement with firefighters union that would allow it to unilaterally change health insurance benefits that it was providing to union's members during period of agreement. A party does not act in bad faith merely by submitting to an interest arbitrator a proposal pertaining to a permissive subject of bargaining.A party is not prejudiced by submission of the issue, as its objection will preclude the arbitrator from considering it.(McLAREN and SPENCE, concurring.)

House Bill 6285

Topic: 
Mobile Home and Landlord and Tenant Rights Act.

(Moeller, D-Elgin; Bush, D-Grayslake) requires the park owner to give the tenant written notice specifying the reason for any fine that may be imposed on the tenant if the tenant breaches any provision of the lease or park rules. “Fine” does not include any fees that are imposed on a tenant for services or products provided by the park owner to the tenant.

If a fine is imposed on a tenant, the following applies for 45 days after written notice of the fine is delivered to the tenant: (1) non-payment of a fine is not grounds for refusal to accept a rent payment; and (2) the fine may not be deducted from a rent payment. Acceptance of a rent payment may not be construed as a waiver of an unpaid fine. Passed both chambers. 

Not applicable

Topic: 
Statutory Court Fee Task Force

The Access to Justice Act created the Statutory Court Fee Task Force to study the current system of fees, fines, and other court costs and propose recommendations to the Illinois General Assembly and Illinois Supreme Court. Its report may be found at the URL below. 

Watkins v. Mellen

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Arbitration
Citation
Case Number: 
2016 IL App (3d) 140570
Decision Date: 
Thursday, April 21, 2016
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Marshall Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
HOLDRIDGE

Trustee for land trust and partnership filed declaratory judgment action in circuit court seeking authority to sell real estate which formed corpus of trust at public auction. The Defendants' filing of a Section 2-619(a)(2) motion to dismiss, and litigating merits of that motion, was conduct inconsistent with the right to arbitrate. Thus Defendants clearly abandoned that right, and waived their right to file a subsequent motion to compel arbitration. (McDADE and CARTER, concurring.)

Senate Bill 2503

Topic: 
Judicial facilities fee

(Manar, D-Bunker Hill) allows all county boards to impose by ordinance a “judicial facilities fee” on all defendants convicted in traffic and criminal cases and all civil litigants. The fee may not be more than $30. It also expands the use of this fee from defraying new construction to include renovating existing judicial facilities. Under current law, only Will and Kane counties have authority to do impose this fee for new construction. Scheduled for hearing Tuesday in Senate Judiciary Committee. 

House Bill 4400

Topic: 
Perjury

(Drury, D-Highwood) makes it perjury if a person knowingly under oath makes contradictory statements to the degree that one of them is necessarily false in the same or in different proceedings in which an oath or affirmation is required if: (1) each statement was material to the issue or point in question; and (2) each statement was made within the period of the statute of limitations for the offense charged. Makes it a defense if the defendant at the time he or she made each declaration believed the declaration to be true. Just introduced.

Cook County ordinances 15-5775 and 15-5780

Topic: 
Filing fee increase
The Cook County Board has on its agenda two ordinances to increase litigants and defendants' filing fees from $15 to $25 for the court automation fee (15-5775) and from $15 to $25 for the document storage fee (15-5780). These fees are paid by civil litigants and defendants in felony, misdemeanor, municipal ordinance, conservation, and traffic cases (excluding minor traffic cases satisfied without a court appearance. These two ordinances will probably be voted the week of November 16th to take effect December 1, 2015.