ADR and Mediation

Hobbs v. Mowatt

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Arbitration
Citation
Case Number: 
2019 IL App (1st) 182458
Decision Date: 
Monday, July 8, 2019
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 1st Div,
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
GRIFFIN

Plaintiff, a resident of Georgia, filed personal injury case for injuries from motor vehicle accident; matter was subject to nonbinding mandatory arbitration. During the morning of the arbitration hearing, Plaintiff called her attorney to advise that she was driving to hearing from Georgia but would arrive late due to a snowstorm en route.  Plaintiff's counsel then proceeded with the hearing in her absence, while another attorney from that office presented an emergency motion for extension of time which court denied it because arbitration hearing had already begun. Plaintiff (who arrived 4 hours after hearing had begun) made requisite showing that her failure to appear was not in bad faith, and was not found to be a deliberate and pronounced disregard for the rules and the court. Court abused its discretion in imposing sanction of precluding Plaintiff from rejecting the arbitration award entered for Defendant. (MIKVA and WALKER, concurring.)

House Bill 834

Topic: 
Equal Pay Act of 2003

(Moeller, D-Elgin; Castro, D-Elgin) amends the Equal Pay Act of 2003 to make it unlawful for an employer to require an employee to sign a contract or waiver that would prohibit the employee from disclosing or discussing information about the employee’s wages, salary, benefits, or other compensation. It also makes it unlawful for an employer to seek the wage or salary history, including benefits or other compensation, of a job applicant from any current or former employer with exceptions if it is a matter of public record or if the job applicant is a current employee and is applying for a position with the same current employer. Makes other changes. Sent to the Governor and would take effect 60 days after it becomes law (March 1, 2020). 
 

Senate Bill 2128

Topic: 
Legal transcription

(Harmon, D-Oak Park; Zalewski, D-Chicago) creates a licensed activity of the “practice of voice writer reporting.” This means reporting by the use of a system of repeating words of the speaker into a closed-microphone voice-dictation silencer that is capable of digital translation into text. It could be used for grand jury proceedings, court proceedings, court-related proceedings, pretrial examinations, depositions, motions, and related proceedings of like character. Passed both chambers. 

Brookner v. General Motors Corp.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Arbitration
Citation
Case Number: 
2019 IL App (3d) 170629
Decision Date: 
Saturday, May 25, 2019
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Will Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
SCHMIDT

Plaintiff filed civil complaint against several defendants based on his purchase of a vehicle. Court properly granted dealership's motion to compel arbitration, after finding that Plaintiff signed arbitration agreement as part of his vehicle purchase.Section 2(a) of the Uniform Arbitration Act calls for only a summary determination of the issues, and does not require an evidentiary hearing. Hearing on motion to compel arbitration was sufficient. Court's factual finding that Plaintiff signed arbitration agreement was a substantive determination of whether it was valid and whether it was forged.Court did not abuse its discreiton in granting motion to compel.(HOLDRIDGE, concurring; McDADE, dissenting.)

Zombie Settlements

By Hon. Geraldine Soat Brown (ret.) & Lorence H. Slutzky
May
2019
Article
, Page 32
Nightmare settlements that claw their way back from the dead.s

Drawing a Wide Circle

April
2019
Article
, Page 20
A primer on the different forms of ADR.

Senate Bill 30

Topic: 
Workplace Transparency Act.

(Bush, D-Grayslake) creates the Workplace Transparency Act. It provides that employers may not require an employee or prospective employee to sign a nondisclosure agreement that contains any provision that has the purpose or effect of limiting the disclosure of sexual misconduct, retaliation, or unlawful discrimination; suppressing information relevant to an investigation into a claim of sexual misconduct, retaliation, or unlawful discrimination; impairing the ability of any person to report a claim of sexual misconduct, retaliation, or unlawful discrimination; or waiving a substantive or procedural right or remedy of any person relating to a claim of sexual misconduct, retaliation, or unlawful discrimination. Makes such agreements void as against public policy and unenforceable, and that agreements that contain such provisions but entered into before the effective date of the Act are voidable by a party who entered into the agreement under specified circumstances. Senate Bill 30 was just introduced. 

Ward v. Hilliard

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Arbitration
Citation
Case Number: 
2018 IL App (5th) 180214
Decision Date: 
Friday, October 5, 2018
District: 
5th Dist.
Division/County: 
Randolph Co.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
OVERSTREET

Plaintiff filed complaint alleging that Defendants were negligent in management of her IRA. Parties' contract as to management of IRA included an agreement to arbitrate disputes stemming from the contract.Plaintiff acknowledged that, prior to signing account application, she understood that Defendants were agreeing to open and manage her IRA account in exchange for her agreement to arbitrate disputes arising from management of her account. Physical attachment is not required for a separate document to be incorporated by reference. Documents as a whole reveal intent of the parties to be bound to arbitration provisions. (WELCH and MOORE, concurring.)

Kero v. Palacios

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Arbitration
Citation
Case Number: 
2018 IL App (1st) 172427
Decision Date: 
Monday, July 23, 2018
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 1st Div,
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
MIKVA

Court properly granted motion of Defendant rehabilitation facility to compel arbitration of the negligence claims that Plaintiff filed against it. Affidavits and admission packet provides sufficient facts to support claim of Defendant that it is a party to the arbitration contract. Plaintiff failed to put forward any evidence of duress. The fact that Plaintiff was not told in advance that Defendant would give him an arbitration agreement to sign is not evidence of duress. factr(PIERCE and GRIFFIN, concurring.)