In re H.S.
Respondent appealed from the circuit court’s adjudicatory findings in which the court found that respondent’s minor children were abused and neglected and argued that the circuit court erred when it admitted and relied on hearsay evidence in reaching its conclusion. The appellate court affirmed, finding that the testimony at issue was not hearsay because it was not presented for the truth of the matter asserted because it was offered to show the agency’s course of conduct in taking protective custody of the children. The appellate court further found that the circuit court’s order was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. (MITCHELL and MIKVA, concurring)