Commercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy

Public Act 97-839

Topic: 
Business law cleanup
(Silverstein, D-Chicago; Mautino, D-Spring Valley) is a cleanup of the statutes that authorize organizing as a business entity under Illinois law. (1) It provides consistency between the various business entity acts by authorizing filings previously missing from the Acts, particularly the Uniform Partnership Act and Uniform Limited Partnership Act and by standardizing the filing fees. (2) Allows for electronic filing of documents and reports. (3) Establishes procedures for reinstatement of limited liability partnership status. (4) Provides the manner for resignation as agent for service of process and the method of service. (5) Revises the manner by which administrative dissolution, revocation, and reinstatement is accomplished. Effective July 20, 2012.

Schafer v. UnionBank/Central

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Summary Judgment
Citation
Case Number: 
2012 IL App (3d) 110008
Decision Date: 
Wednesday, July 18, 2012
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Bureau Co.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
HOLDRIDGE
Plaintiff's complaint alleging bank converted their personal property was sufficiently pleaded. Court improperly granted summary judgment for bank based on commercial security agreement (CSA), as genuine issue of fact as to whether, as bank alleged in affirmative defense, CSA gave bank authority to take immediate possession of personal property. (LYTTON, specially concurring; SCHMIDT, dissenting.)

Michael v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
Banking
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 10-3109
Decision Date: 
July 18, 2012
Federal District: 
Petition for Review, Order of FDIC
Holding: 
Petition denied
Record contained sufficient evidence to support FDIC Bd.’s order prohibiting petitioners from participating in affairs of any insured depository based on petitioners’ violations of Federal Reserve regulations and breaches of fiduciary duties arising out of petitioners’ (members of bank’s Board of Director) procurement of loans from said bank in excessive amount in violation of Regulation O and their double pledging of stock certificate as collateral for separate loans. ALJ could properly find that: (1) petitioners had actually voted to approve instant “insider” loan to themselves in their role as Bd. members and had failed to inform other Bd. members of actual loan-to value ratio in said loan; and (2) petitioners had engaged in unsafe banking practice by double pledging stock certificate. Ct. rejected petitioners’ invitation to reweigh credibility determinations made by both ALJ and FDIC.

Sunbeam Products, Inc. v. Chicago American Manufacturing, LLC

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
Bankruptcy
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 11-3920
Decision Date: 
July 9, 2012
Federal District: 
N.D. Ill., E. Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed
Bankruptcy Ct. did not err in finding that third-party could continue to sell box fans using debtor’s patents and trademarks even though Trustee had rejected executory portion of debtor’s contract with third-party that allowed third-party to manufacture and sell said fans if debtor did not wish to purchase them. Trustee’s rejection of contract under 11 USC section 365(a) did not serve to rescind contract, such that third-party could continue to assert its rights under contract to manufacture and sell said fans.

Senate Bill 3572

Topic: 
Common Interest Community Association Act
(Haine, D-Alton; Cross, R-Oswego) makes a number of changes to this Act including the following. (1) Prohibits an action to incorporate a common interest community as a municipality until two-thirds of the members sign an incorporation document. (2) Requires elections to the board must be held at least once every 24 months, eliminates voting by proxy, and prohibits a term of office as a board member or officer for more than four years. (3) If the total common expenses exceed the budget, the board must disclose this variance to all members and identify subsequent assessments that will be made to offset this in future budgets. (4) Assessments for additions and alterations to common areas or to association-owned property not in the annual budget must be separately assessed and are subject to approval of a simple majority (instead of two-thirds) of the total members at a meeting called for that purpose. Passed both chambers; effective immediately if the Governor signs it.

Senate Bill 3202

Topic: 
Community association fees
(Maloney, D-Chicago; Thapedi, D-Chicago) amends the Community Association Manager Licensing and Disciplinary Act. It requires all community associations pay to the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation an annual fee of $50 plus an additional $1 per unit not to exceed an annual fee of $1,000 if they (1) have 10 or more units, (2) retain an individual to provide services as a community association manager for compensation, (3) are not master associations, or (4) are registered in the State as a not-for-profit corporation. Passed both chambers; effective immediately if the Governor signs it.

Insureone Independent Insurance v. Hallberg

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Contracts
Citation
Case Number: 
2012 IL App (1st) 092385
Decision Date: 
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 3d Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed in part and reversed in part; remanded.
Justice: 
SALONE
Bench trial resolved disputes among purchasers and sellers of assets of several insurance companies. Plaintiffs' evidence of sales made by Defendants' competing agencies led to reasonable inference that Plaintiffs would have made a portion of these sales absent Defendants' competition, given undisputed evidence that Defendants opened stores in close proximity to Plaintiffs' stores in effort to target their customers. Thus, Plaintiffs showed that losses were causally related to Defendants' breaches of restrictive covenants, and that Plaintiffs had legitimate expectation that Defendants could not begin to form competing businesses until expiration of covenants. Court erred in granting summary judgment to a defendant who lacked standing to pursue his claim as to contingent purchase price payments. (STEELE and MURPHY, concurring.)

Nipponkoa Ins. Co., Ltd. v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc.

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
Carmack Amendment
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 11-3085
Decision Date: 
July 5, 2012
Federal District: 
S.D. Ind., Evansville Div.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded
Dist. Ct. erred in granting defendant-shipper’s motion for summary judgment in action seeking damages to plaintiff-insured’s expensive medical devices that were incurred while said devices were shipped to trade show, where Dist. Ct. found that contract between defendant and third-party acting on behalf of insured, as well as bill of lading, capped defendant’s liability to $0.60 per pound. While defendant argued that instant limitation of liability was consistent with Carmack Amendment, remand was required to determine whether plaintiff’s insured had reasonable opportunity to chose between $0.60 per pound liability cap or some other higher level of liability. Record also contained material issue as to whether instant third-party could bind plaintiff to limitation set forth in contract or bill of lading.

TH Davidson and Company v. Eidola Concrete

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Contracts
Citation
Case Number: 
2012 IL App (3d) 110641
Decision Date: 
Monday, July 2, 2012
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Kankakee Co
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
CARTER
Company sued concrete company and its co-manager for money owed on line of credit; court entered judgment in Plaintiff's favor for $5600. Although co-manager Defendant personally guaranteed only $1,000, the parties contemplated a future course of dealing through the contract ,contract contained no limiting language,co-manager's liability was for a continuing guaranty, and was not limited to $1,000. (SCHMIDT and McDADE, concurring.)