Construction Law

Construction Law

Public Act 98-99

Topic: 
Fraudulent real estate documents
(Lang, D-Chicago; Silverstein, D-Chicago) allows a recorder of deeds to establish and use a “Fraud Referral and Review Process” for deeds and instruments that the recorder reasonably believes are fraudulent, unlawfully altered, or intended to unlawfully cloud or transfer the title of any real property. If the recorder reasonably believes the document is fraudulent, the recorder may refer the instrument to a county administrative law judge for review. If the ALJ finds by clear and convincing evidence that the document is fraudulent, the ALJ must issue a judgment to that effect with a notation that the fraudulent document may not affect the chain of title of the property in any way. Effective July 19, 2013.

Gerdau Ameristeel US, Inc. v. Ahal Contracting Co., Inc.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Mechanic's Liens
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL App (4th) 120547
Decision Date: 
Thursday, May 23, 2013
District: 
4th Dist.
Division/County: 
Champaign Co.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Justice: 
TURNER
Material supplier filed action for foreclosure of its mechanics lien against several companies, including two companies which later sought to enforce their secondary subcontractors' liens under Mechanics Lien Act. Court improperly granted summary judgment in favor of those two companies without limiting their recovery to only their pro rata shares of the amount of unpaid contract funds remaining at time they served their notices of lien. (KNECHT and HARRIS, concurring.)

Senate Bill 56

Topic: 
Mortgage Foreclosure Article
(Collins, D-Chicago; Cassidy, D-Chicago) does three things. (1) Defines a “bona fide tenant” substantially consistent with the 2009 federal Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act. (2) Requires a petitioner to wait 90 days (unless the lease term is longer than 90 days) before a forcible entry and detainer action may be used to terminate the possessory rights of a bona fide tenant in residential real estate. Orders of possession issued in the foreclosure proceeding will continue to be entered against the mortgagor. (3) Addresses the deficiency issue in the 2010 McGahan case as to what procedure the mortgagee must follow if a mortgagor dies. If the survivor holds a 100% interest in the property because the survivor is the deceased mortgagor’s surviving joint tenant or surviving tenant by the entirety, a special representative for the deceased mortgagor need not be appointed. Passed both chambers.

Senate Bill 56

Topic: 
Mortgage Foreclosure Article
(Collins, D-Chicago; Cassidy, D-Chicago) does three things. (1) Defines a “bona fide tenant” substantially consistent with the 2009 federal Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act. (2) Requires a petitioner to wait 90 days (unless the lease term is longer than 90 days) before a forcible entry and detainer action may be used to terminate the possessory rights of a bona fide tenant in residential real estate. Orders of possession issued in the foreclosure proceeding will continue to be entered against the mortgagor. (3) Addresses the deficiency issue in the 2010 McGahan case as to what procedure the mortgagee must follow if a mortgagor dies. If the survivor holds a 100% interest in the property because the survivor is the deceased mortgagor’s surviving joint tenant or surviving tenant by the entirety, a special representative for the deceased mortgagor need not be appointed. Passed both chambers.

J.S. Reimer, Inc. v. The Village of Orland Hills

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Statute of Limitations
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL App (1st) 120106
Decision Date: 
Friday, May 10, 2013
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 5th Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
TAYLOR
Village sued architect for breach of contract and fraud, for faulty architecture and design in building of new community center. Center's concrete floor is sinking into the ground as it was built over peat. Court properly granted summary judgment for architect as time-barred by four-year construction statute of limitations. Language in standard form contract provided that limitations period would expire in fixed time frame from date of substantial completion, regardless of whether injury was discovered or discoverable then. Transaction was at arms-length, and allegations that Village trusted architect to fulfill its contractual obligations are insufficient to transform relationship into one of confidence.(HOWSE and PALMER, concurring.)

House Bill 2327

Topic: 
Filing fee increase
(Riley, D-Hazel Crest; Hutchinson, D-Chicago Heights) authorizes county boards to increase the court automation fee and the court document fee from $15 to $25. These fees are currently being paid by civil litigants and convicted defendants.The ceiling for defendants will be $15 for the court automation fee. Passed the House and awaiting a Senate Revenue Committee vote in the Senate.

Senate Bill 1912

Topic: 
Tort cases and settlement
(Raoul, D-Chicago) amends the Code of Civil Procedure create an enforcement mechanism for cases that settle but the defendant won’t comply with the settlement. It is limited to cases seeking money damages involving personal injury, wrongful death, or tort action. It requires a settling defendant pay all sums due to the plaintiff within 21 days of tender of all applicable documents required under this new Section. The procedure is as follows: (1) Requires a “settling defendant” to tender a release to the plaintiff within 14 days of written confirmation of the settlement. If the law requires court approval of a settlement, the plaintiff must tender to the defendant a copy of the court order approving the settlement. (2) If there is a known third-party right of recovery or subrogation interest, the plaintiff may protect the third-party’s right of recovery or subrogation interest by tendering to the defendant: (a) A signed release of the attorney’s lien. (b) Any of the following: (i) a signed release of a healthcare-provider lien; (ii) a letter from the plaintiff’s attorney agreeing to hold the full amount of the claimed lien in his or her client-fund account pending final resolution of the lien amount; or (iii) an offer that the defendant hold the full amount of the claimed right of recovery pending final resolution of the amount of the right of recovery. (c) Any of the following: (i) documentation of the agreement between the plaintiff and Medicare, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services, or the private health insurance company as to the amount of the settlement that will be accepted in satisfaction of right of recovery; (ii) a letter from the plaintiff’s attorney agreeing to hold the full amount of the claimed right to recovery in his or her client-fund account pending final resolution of the amount of the right to recovery; or (iii) an offer that the defendant hold the full amount of the claimed right to recovery pending final resolution of the amount of the right of recovery. (3) If the applicable court finds after a hearing that timely payment has not been made under this Section, judgment must be entered against that defendant for the amount in the executed release, costs incurred in obtaining the judgment, and 9% interest from the date of the plaintiff’s tender. (4) Senate Bill 1912 exempts units of local government, the State of Illinois, and state employees. Parties may agree to some other procedure if they wish. It passed the Senate yesterday and is in the House.

Senate Bill 1912

Topic: 
Claim for money damages
(Raoul, D-Chicago) makes several changes to the settlement of a claim for money damages. (1) Requires the settling defendant to tender a release within 14 days of the settlement. (2) If court approval of the settlement is required, it requires the plaintiff to timely tender to the settling defendant of a copy of the court order approving the settlement. (3) Requires the plaintiff to tender to settling defendant documentation about a known third-party lienholder or subrogation interest. (4) Requires a settling defendant to pay all sums due to the plaintiff within 21 days of tender of the executed release and lienholder documentation. (4) Awards interest under Section 2-1303 of the Code of Civil Procedure for failure to pay within 21 days from plaintiff’s tender of the executed release unless good cause is shown otherwise. (5) Senate Bill 1912 doesn’t apply to actions against the State, State employees, or anyone else who may be indemnified under the State Employee Indemnification Act. It is on third reading in the Senate.

House Bill 2832

Topic: 
Fraudulent real estate transactions
(Lang, D-Chicago) allows a recorder of deeds to establish and use a “Fraud Referral and Review Process” for deeds and instruments that the recorder reasonably believes are fraudulent, unlawfully altered, or intended to unlawfully cloud or transfer the title of any real property. It creates a list of 19 criteria for the recorder to consider in determining whether the document is fraudulent. If the recorder reasonably believes the document may be fraudulent after this review, the recorder must refer the instrument to an administrative law judge for review. The recorder must place a Notice of Referral in the Property Index identifying this document, document number, and the date of the referral. The recorder must also notify the last owner of record. The ALJ must schedule a hearing within 10 business days from receipt of the referral. If the ALJ believes by a preponderance of the evidence that the document is fraudulent, the ALJ must issue a judgment to that effect. The recorder must record that judgment with the notation stating that the fraudulent document may not affect the chain of title of the property in any way. Passed the House and in the Senate.

NES Rentals Holdings, Inc. v. Steine Cold Storage, Inc.

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
Indemnity
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 12-1401
Decision Date: 
April 8, 2013
Federal District: 
N.D. Ind., Ft. Wayne Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed
Dist. Ct. did not err in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment in action by plaintiff alleging that defendant breached indemnity clause in rental agreement between parties where plaintiff was sued in underlying wrongful death action for providing faulty boom lift that defendant (as employer of underlying plaintiff) had rented from plaintiff. While clause in rental agreement provided that defendant agreed to indemnify plaintiff for all bodily injury claims regardless of whether said injuries were caused by negligence arising out of use or condition of boom lift, Dist. Ct. could properly find that under Indiana law said rental agreement did not expressly state in clear language that defendant had agreed to indemnify plaintiff for plaintiff’s own negligence. Fact that clause contained language that excluded indemnity coverage when plaintiff’s conduct was sole proximate cause of injuries did not require different result.