Construction Law

Construction Law

House Bill 4783

Topic: 
Condominium Property Act
(E. Chris Welch, D-Westchester; Steans, D-Chicago) makes the following declarations unenforceable as against public policy if the declarations affect the common elements or more than one unit and require any of the following before the board can take legal action on behalf of the association: (1) consent of a percentage of unit owners, (2) arbitration, (3) mediation before an action may be filed in court, or (4) a restriction or delay in the board’s ability to bring an action affecting the common elements or more than one unit. An otherwise unenforceable provision may be enforced after the election of the first-unit owner board of managers if it is approved by a unit-owner percentage vote of not less than 75% of the total in the aggregate of the undivided ownership of the common elements.

Senate Bill 2829

Topic: 
Administrative review and attorney's fees
(Link, D-Lake Bluff; Zalewski, D-Chicago) allows court to award attorney’s fees for the prevailing party in certain administrative-review actions. It applies only to the decision of a code-hearing officer that imposes a fine or penalty against the owner of a single-family or multi-family residential dwelling for a violation relating to the condition or use of that residential property. It is limited to municipalities with a population of 500,000 or less. The court may award the plaintiff all reasonable costs, including court costs and attorney’s fees, if the court finds that (1) the hearing officer’s decision was arbitrary and capricious; or (2) the defendant failed to file a record under Section 3-108 of the Code of Civil Procedure that is sufficient to allow the court to determine whether the hearing officer’s decision was arbitrary and capricious. The court may award the municipality the same damages if the court finds that the plaintiff’s action seeking administrative review is not reasonably well grounded in fact, is not warranted by existing law, or is not accompanied by a reasonable argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law. Passed both chambers.

House Bill 5395

Topic: 
Evictions
(Monique Davis, D-Chicago) amends the Forcible Entry and Detainer section of the Code of Civil Procedure to do three things. (1) Limits the number of motions a tenant may file to stay the enforcement of an order for possession to two unless good cause is shown by written motion. (2) Allows a "peace officer" to execute an order for possession. (3) Also allows service of an order of possession by an off-duty peace officer who is employed on a part-time basis by a licensee under the Private Detective, Private Alarm, Private Security, Fingerprint Vendor, and Locksmith Act of 2004. In the House on third reading.

Lee v. Six Flags Themes Parks, Inc.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Wrongful Death
Citation
Case Number: 
2014 IL App (1st) 130771
Decision Date: 
Friday, May 9, 2014
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 6th Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
REYES
Plaintiff filed suit for wrongful death and survival claims based on theories of construction negligence and premises liability. Decedent, a heavy equipment mechanic, fell 43 feet to his death during project of dismantling steel structure amusement ride. Degree of contractual control, by itself, does not establish genuine issue of material fact as to retained control. Evidence as to any form of control was insufficient to raise genuine issue of material fact on issue of vicarious liability, direct liability, or premises liability of amusement park. (ROCHFORD and LAMPKIN, concurring.)

Fonseca v. Clark Constuction Group, LLC

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Construction Contracts
Citation
Case Number: 
2014 IL App (1st) 130308
Decision Date: 
Monday, April 28, 2014
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co.,1st Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
CUNNINGHAM
Court properly entered summary judgment for general contractor in personal injury action filed by employee of drywall subcontractor who tripped and fell on electrical pipe on floor of hallway. General contractor, although it had general supervisory authority, did not exercise this authority and did not retain control over incidental aspects of electrical subcontractor's work Testimony of employees confirmed that electrical subcontractor was responsible to clean up its own debris and that it controlled means and methods of its own work during construction of building. (CONNORS and DELORT, concurring.)

Cain v. Contarino

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Negligence
Citation
Case Number: 
2014 IL App (2d) 130482
Decision Date: 
Thursday, April 10, 2014
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
Winnebago Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
BIRKETT
Court properly granted summary judgment in favor of defendant in negligence action for construction accident sustained by carpenter when setting roof trusses on garage, while working for his employer, as subcontractor for the Defendant general contractor. Plaintiff alleged that general contractor failed to ensure that subcontractor maintained safe work practices at jobsite. General contractor owed no duty of care under retained control exception of Section 414, and any such duty would not have required providing subcontractor with a crane to perform truss work. No showing that general contractor was a "possessor" of land where accident occurred which had ability to exclude others or regulate their use of the property. (ZENOFF and JORGENSEN, concurring.)

Krien v. Harsco Corp.

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
Indemnity
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 13-2272
Decision Date: 
March 13, 2014
Federal District: 
E.D. Wisc.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded
Dist. Ct. erred in granting third-party defendant’s motion for summary judgment in third-party complaint seeking indemnification for $900,000 settlement that third-party plaintiff paid to plaintiff (employee of third-party defendant) in personal injury action arising out of fall plaintiff experienced while using third-party plaintiff’s scaffold at construction site operated by third-party defendant. Third-party plaintiff was entitled to indemnity where operative contract language required third-party defendant to indemnify third-party plaintiff where, as here, third-party plaintiff sustained loss arising out of injuries incurred by employees of third-party defendant who had been using equipment supplied by third-party plaintiff. Moreover, record did not otherwise indicate that third-party plaintiff, which was not at construction site at time of accident, was negligent in “operating” scaffold plank that had broken under plaintiff’s feet. Fact that plaintiff could not directly sue third-party defendant because of Wisc. workers’ compensation law did not require different result.

Gomez v. Bovis Lend Lease, Inc.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Contracts
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL App (1st) 130568
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, December 24, 2013
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 3d Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
HYMAN
(Court opinion corrected 2/27/14.) Construction worker, during construction of Trump Tower, was injured when plywood board covering infill, upon which he stepped broke, sending him from eighty-sixth floor to deck of eighty-fifth floor. Contract is ambiguous as subcontractor’s duty as to infills is open to differing interpretations. Extrinsic evidence as to previous dealings and parties’ performance may be used to interpret contract, even though contract has integration clause. (NEVILLE and MASON, concurring.)