Construction Law

Construction Law

Hensley Construction v. Pulte Home Corporation

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Construction Contracts
Citation
Case Number: 
Nos. 2-09-1140 & 2-09-1141 cons.
Decision Date: 
Friday, March 26, 2010
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
Kane Co.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
McLAREN
Plaintiff, an underground utility business specializing in installation of water and sewer lines, sued residential construction businesses for non-payment. Trial court ordered construction businesses to pay money into escrow account pending final resolution of cases. Plaintiff requested only monetary relief, thus injunctive relief inappropriate as an improper prejudgment equitable attachment. Equitable attachments are prohibited in Illinois except where claimant has interest in specific funds held by debtor, which was not the case here, as funds had no connection to underlying dispute.

Miller v. Herman

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
Contracts
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 08-3093
Decision Date: 
March 25, 2010
Federal District: 
N.D. Ill., E. Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed and vacated in part and remanded
Dist. Ct. did not err in dismissing plaintiff's lawsuit alleging that defendants-contractor and manufacturer of windows breached certain warranties (that made reference to Magnuson-Moss) arising out of installation of windows that leaked in plaintiff's new home that was built by defendant-contractor. Plaintiff failed to state valid cause of action since instant windows were not consumer products as that term is contemplated under Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act because windows were not purchased in connection with improvement or repair of existing home.

Thompson v. Gordon

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Summary Judgment
Experts
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 2-07-0667
Decision Date: 
Thursday, November 19, 2009
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
Lake Co.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
O'MALLEY
Language in contract between engineering companies and developer obligated engineering companies to employ professional standard of care in designing replacement for bridge deck. Affidavit of civil engineer is evidence that companies breached standard of care by not considering or designing improved median barrier, although median barrier was not explicitly mentioned in contract.