Real Estate Law

Selling Land Owned With No Survivorship

September
2021
Article
, Page 10
Using bond in lieu of probate for transferring title.
1 comment (Most recent July 30, 2024)

Freedom Mortgage Corp. v. Olivera

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Mortgage Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2021 IL App (2d) 190462
Decision Date: 
Thursday, August 5, 2021
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
Kane Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed in part and vacated in part; remanded with directions.
Justice: 
JORGENSEN

Court dismissed mortgage foreclosure complaint, and denied Defendants' request for Rule 137 sanctions against Plaintiff. Bankruptcy discharge without affirmation means Defendant Rivkah is no longer bound by the mortgage contract, but she also can no longer use the HUD regulations as a defense. Noncompliance with HUD regulations is a defense to foreclosure. Based on default date alleged in the complaint, Plaintiff did not comply with HUD regulation 203.604 in a timely fashion. Appellate court's awarding of attorney fees and costs related to the appeal under section 1510 is discretionary. Remanded for trial court to determine whether such award is warranted.(McLAREN and SCHOSTOK, concurring.)

City of Chicago v. Jewellery Tower LLC

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Receivers
Citation
Case Number: 
2021 IL App (1st) 201352
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 6th Div.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Justice: 
CONNORS

City filed complaint against owners of Pittsfield Building for building code violations as to the interior and exterior of the building. Court abused its discretion when it denied Defendant LLC’s motion to remove the court-appointed receiver. The receiver could not be impartial or carry out his fiduciary duties due to receiver’s conflict of interest, because of his other business relationship with another party in the case from which the receiver could have earned a substantial profit of $4.5 million and which was not initially disclosed to circuit court.(HARRIS and ODEN JOHNSON, concurring).

Senate Bill 2179

Topic: 
Attorneys' statute of repose

(Sims, D-Chicago; Ann Williams, D-Chicago)  was signed into law on Aug. 13 by Governor Pritzker. It repeals the current exception to the attorney’s six-year statute of repose for estate planning work. That exception was for two years after the death of the client. Senate Bill 2179 provides for a six-year statute of repose to make it consistent with all other legal work, but it also includes a safe harbor period to ensure judicial approval of the legislation. This means that for estate planning done before the amendment’s effective date, regardless of how long ago, there would be a reasonable time period (not to exceed six years) after the statute’s effective date within which a claim could be brought to ensure claims are not abruptly terminated. It takes effect on Jan. 1, 2022. 

Public Act 102-160

Topic: 
Electronic Notaries

(Holmes, D-Aurora; Kifowit, D-Aurora) amends the Illinois Notary Public Act providing requirements authorizing electronic and remote notarization and electronic notaries public. Effective on the later of: (1) January 1, 2022; or (2) the date on which the Secretary of State files with its Index Department a notice of its adoption of rules necessary to implement this Act. Some parts of the Act take effect on July 1, 2022. 

Senate Bill 730

Topic: 
The Electronic Wills and Remote Witnesses Act

(Crowe, D-Maryville; Didech, D-Buffalo Grove) provides for (1) the valid execution, attestation, self-proving, and probate of electronic wills, paper copies of electronic wills, and wills attested to by witnesses through audio-video communication; and (2) the valid execution, attestation, and witnessing of documents, other than wills, through audio-visual communication. The Governor signed it yesterday, and it took effect on his signature. 

Village of Bloomingdale v. Lake/Ridge, LLC

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Condemnation
Citation
Case Number: 
2021 IL App (2d) 200232
Decision Date: 
Thursday, June 24, 2021
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
Du Page Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
BRIDGES

Village filed condemnation action against property owner under Eminent Domain Act. Section 10-5-70(a) fee petitioners must be brought within the condemnation action, while trial court retains its general jurisdiction, within 30 days of the entry of the final judgment in that action. Court properly dismissed Defendant's fee petition as untimely. (ZENOFF and BIRKETT, concurring.)

Senate Bill 636

Topic: 
Condominiums

(Murphy, D-Des Plaines; Gong-Gershowitz, D-Glenview) allows a new association (or an existing association by amendment to its declaration after the effective date of the public act) to elect a board structure that must have a majority (but may not require more than a majority) of unit owners be owner-occupants. The amended section was specifically designed to not create two classes of membership.  Every unit owner is still qualified to be a member of the board, whether or not they are a resident, and every member can still vote for any candidate running for an open seat on the board. The amendment modifies only the board structure in a manner not unlike previously existing section 18(a)(1) that required initial structuring of the board so that board member terms would be staggered. Sent to the Governor. 

Wood v. Evergreen Condominium Ass'n

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Condominiums
Citation
Case Number: 
2021 IL App (1st) 200687
Decision Date: 
Wednesday, July 7, 2021
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 3d Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
BURKE

Plaintiff filed complaint against her Condominium Association and its acting President who prohibited her from operating her condominium unit as a short-term rental on Airbnb, on the basis that the Condominium Declarations barred short-term rentals. Plaintiff granted her guests a mere license to use her unit, not a lease. The restrictive covenant in section 7 of the Declarations, which must be strictly construed, does not bar short-term licensing of the units. City of Chicago imposes regulations on short-term rentals similar to those imposed upon a hotel, and imposes taxes on and requires that financial records must be kept for short-term rentals. This is evidence that Plaintiff's short-term rentals constitutes a "business" for purposes of section 11(b) of the Declarations. The more general prohibition in section 11(b) controls to prohibit Plaintiff's short-term Airbnb rental of her unit. (McBRIDE and ELLIS, concurring.)