Real Estate Law

A.J. Smith Federal Savings Bank v. Sabuco

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Mortgage Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL App (3d) 120578
Decision Date: 
Friday, May 10, 2013
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Will Co.
Holding: 
Appeal dismissed.
Justice: 
LYTTON
Defendant, who received loan from Plaintiff bank secured by mortgage on a commercial office building, filed motion for release and satisfaction from deficiency judgment, after mortgage foreclosure proceeding and just prior to wage deduction hearing. Motion was an attack on the judgment underlying the wage deduction proceeding, which could be made at that hearing. As validity of underlying judgment will not be finally decided until hearing, order denying motion for accord and satisfaction is interlocutory and not appealable, and thus appellate court lacks jurisdiction to consider order denying motion. WRIGHT and HOLDRIDGE, concurring.)

House Bill 2269

Topic: 
Real estate documents and thumbprints
Real estate documents and thumbprints. House Bill 2269 (Evans, D-Chicago; Napoleon Harris III) extends the sunset date for requiring a thumbprint of the transferor in a Cook County residential real estate transaction from July 1, 2013 to July 1, 2018. Passed the House and on third reading in the Senate.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Zwolinski

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Appeals
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL App (1st) 120612
Decision Date: 
Monday, May 6, 2013
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co.,1st Div.
Holding: 
Appeal dismissed.
Justice: 
CUNNINGHAM
Defendant in mortgage foreclosure action who later filed notice of appeal failed to serve any of the parties with the notice of appeal as required by Rule 303(c). Other parties were significantly prejudiced by appellant's failure to serve notice of appeal upon them, as they were unable to file briefs on appeal or argue orally and thus were unable to protect their interests through participation in appeal. (ROCHFORD and DELORT, concurring.)

House Bill 2832

Topic: 
Fraudulent real estate transactions
(Lang, D-Chicago) allows a recorder of deeds to establish and use a “Fraud Referral and Review Process” for deeds and instruments that the recorder reasonably believes are fraudulent, unlawfully altered, or intended to unlawfully cloud or transfer the title of any real property. It creates a list of 19 criteria for the recorder to consider in determining whether the document is fraudulent. If the recorder reasonably believes the document may be fraudulent after this review, the recorder must refer the instrument to an administrative law judge for review. The recorder must place a Notice of Referral in the Property Index identifying this document, document number, and the date of the referral. The recorder must also notify the last owner of record. The ALJ must schedule a hearing within 10 business days from receipt of the referral. If the ALJ believes by a preponderance of the evidence that the document is fraudulent, the ALJ must issue a judgment to that effect. The recorder must record that judgment with the notation stating that the fraudulent document may not affect the chain of title of the property in any way. Passed the House and in the Senate.

Mortgage Fraud and E&O Insurance: Making Sure There’s Something to Sue For

By Kurt B. Drain
May
2013
Article
, Page 250
Too often, lenders win mortgage-fraud judgments against defendants who turn out to be judgment proof. The solution? Ensure that mortgage brokers have adequate E&O coverage.

House Bill 2646

Topic: 
Condominium Property Act
(McAsey) does three things to resolve the Act's ambiguity that allows condominium associations to recoup income lost during the lengthy foreclosure of a condominium unit. (1) Clarifies that this Act applies to a purchase at judicial foreclosure sale (other than by a mortgagee) and a purchase from a mortgagee that acquired title through a judicial foreclosure, a consent foreclosure, a common-law strict foreclosure, or the delivery of a deed in lieu of foreclosure. (2) Clarifies and caps the total amount the purchaser may be liable for—no more than the unit's unpaid regular monthly assessments for the nine-month period immediately preceding the judicial foreclosure. This cap includes attorney’s fees and costs incurred by the association during this nine-month period because of the nonpayment of these assessments. (3) Requires that the amount of this unpaid obligation must be included in certain notices in the Mortgage Foreclosure Article and the Condominium Property Act. On second reading in the House.

American Chartered Bank v. USMDS, Inc.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Diligence of Service
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL App (3d) 120397
Decision Date: 
Friday, March 22, 2013
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Will Co.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
O'BRIEN
For service on corporation by publication, Plaintiff was required to conduct diligent inquiry in locating corporation's whereabouts. For service on Secretary of State, Plaintiff was obligated to inquire where corporation's registered agent would receive actual notice of foreclosure complaint, and was required to send notice at address where it would likely receive actual notice. As defendant presented facts challenging due inquiry as to substitute service, court should allow evidentiary hearing on due inquiry issue. (CARTER and LYTTON, concurring.)

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. McCluskey

Illinois Supreme Court PLAs
Civil Court
Foreclosure
Citation
PLA issue Date: 
March 27, 2013
Docket Number: 
No. 115469
District: 
2nd Dist.
This case presents question as to whether trial court properly denied defendant-property owner’s second 2-1301(e) motion to vacate prior foreclosure default judgment under circumstances where defendant had withdrawn original 2-1301(e) motion seeking stay of Sheriff’s sale in exchange for 75-day delay of said sale in order to seek modification of defendant’s mortgage with plaintiff. Appellate Court, in reversing trial court, found that trial court was not barred from considering defendant’s second section 2-1301(e) motion (that challenged affidavit filed in support of plaintiff’s foreclosure petition on grounds that affiant had not attached note or mortgage to said affidavit and had no personal knowledge about facts of case) where prior stipulation to withdraw original section 1301(e) motion made no reference to defendant’s foregoing of any right to file second section 2-1301(e) motion.

The Bank of New York v. Langman

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Mortgage Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL App (2d) 120609
Decision Date: 
Wednesday, March 20, 2013
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
Kane Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
BURKE
Court entered orders of foreclosure of first liens, in favor of two different mortgagees, in two separate cases as to same property. The recorded pending foreclosure action by Plaintiff Bank gave Defendant Bank actual or constructive notice that Plaintiff's mortgage was superior. Plaintiff's lien takes priority over any subsequent purchaser with notice or anything to put that purchaser on inquiry. Another bank's filing of a foreclosure action naming "Unknown Owners" did not extinguish Plaintiff Bank's lien interest as against subsequent lienholders with constructive notice of adverse lien. Recording of lis pendens foreclosure places subsequent purchasers on notice. (JORGENSEN and HUDSON, concurring.)

Crown Mortgage Company v. Young

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Mortgage Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL App (1st) 122363
Decision Date: 
Monday, March 18, 2013
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co.,1st Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
HOFFMAN
After foreclosure, judicial sale yielded surplus of $14,000. Homeowner defendant never claimed surplus on her own, but Plaintiff company filed petition for turnover of surplus, stating that it had promised Defendant $50, as Defendant had assigned company half her interest in funds. Contract was unenforceable, as it was procedurally and substantively unconscionable, given inequality in parties' abilities to understand transaction, and large cost-price disparity. (ROCHFORD, concurring; DELORT, concurring and specially concurring.)