Real Estate Law

Real Estate and Avoiding Probate: The Case for Land Trusts

By David J. Lanciotti
February
2013
Article
, Page 86
While both land trusts and transfer on death instruments allow residential real estate to transfer outside probate, the land trust has important advantages for some clients, this author argues.
1 comment (Most recent January 24, 2013)

Bank of America, N.A. v. Freed

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Receivers
Citation
Case Number: 
2011 IL App (1st) 110749
Decision Date: 
Friday, December 28, 2012
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 2d Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
QUINN
Bank filed action to foreclose $205 million loan guaranteed by Defendants. As Defendants disputed appointment of a receiver for 341 days, during which Bank incurred substantial additional legal fees, court properly entered judgment pursuant to "carve-out" provision of guaranty requiring Defendants to pay full amount due plus costs and interest if they took "any action" in connection with appointment of a receiver. An Illinois LLC has no interest that is affected when a charging order is entered on a judgment debtor's distributional interest because the party for whom order is entered is not an owner of LLC and has no authority over its affiars; thus, LLC has no interest to be protected and need not be made a party. (HARRIS and CONNORS, concurring.)

A.M. Realty Western, LLC. v. MSMC Realty, LLC.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Landlord Tenant
Citation
Case Number: 
2012 IL App (1st) 121183
Decision Date: 
Friday, November 30, 2012
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co.,6th Div.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
R. GORDON
(Court opinion corrected 1/3/13.) Plaintiff realty company sued former tenant to collect monthly payments that former tenant had agreed to pay, in addition to rent, for building improvements. Court erred in holding that sale of property extinguished Plaintiff's standing to sue for HVAC payments under the lease. Debt claimed in Complaint matured before the property was sold, and thus debt did not pass on to the subsequent property owners. (HALL and GARCIA, concurring.)

EMC Mortgage Corporation v. Kemp

Illinois Supreme Court
Civil Court
Mortgage Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2012 IL 113419
Decision Date: 
Friday, December 28, 2012
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
Du Page Co.
Holding: 
Appellate court affirmed; appeal dismissed.
Justice: 
FREEMAN
Appellate jurisdiction does not exist to consider a challenge to an order issued during the pendency of a mortgage foreclosure action. The order confirming sale, rather than judgment of foreclosure, operates as a final and appealable order in a foreclosure case. (KILBRIDE, THOMAS, GARMAN, BURKE, and THEIS, concurring.)

Deutsche Bank National Trust v. Gilbert

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Mortgage Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2012 IL App (2d) 120164
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, September 25, 2012
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
Du Page Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Justice: 
SCHOSTOK
(Modified upon denial of rehearing 12/28/12.) Bank lacked standing at time of filing its foreclosure action, as MERS was identified as mortgagee, on mortgage and note attached to complaint, and assignment of interest in mortgage from MERS to Bank did not occur until several months after foreclosure action was filed. Foreclosing party must actually be in possession of its claimed interest in note when filing suit. Bank was not liable for Truth in Lending Act (TILA) violation, as assignee of loan, because alleged TILA violation was not apparent on face of loan documents. (McLAREN and ZENOFF, concurring.)

Harris, N.A. v. Sauk Village Development, LLC

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Quiet Title
Citation
Case Number: 
2012 IL App (1st) 120817
Decision Date: 
Monday, December 24, 2012
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 2d Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
HARRIS
As title company did not have title to the property in question, it lacked standing to file an action to quiet title. Even though title company alleged, in its amended complaint, that it still owned the property, it alleged facts contradicting that conclusion. (QUINN and SIMON, concurring.)

Mortgage Foreclosure and Standing to Sue

By Steven B. Bashaw
January
2013
Column
, Page 50
When do lenders have standing to foreclose? Cases run the gamut.

Public Act 97-1093

Topic: 
New probate fee
(Silverstein, D-Chicago; Feigenholtz, D-Chicago) creates a $100 fee to open a decedent's estate to fund the State Guardianship and Advocacy Commission. It exempts indigents, the State Guardian, any state agency, any local public guardian, and any state's attorney. It is unknown whether this violates the constitutional nexus between a fee and a service or whether this starts a new trend in financing state government. If constitutional, what's to prevent a new fee next year on all family law litigants to fund DCFS? (2) It also allows the court to appoint a limited guardian for a disabled adult who lacks some but not all of the required capacity. If the court finds that the ward is totally without the required capacity, it may appoint a plenary guardian. (3) It adds criteria for the termination of the guardianship or modification of the guardian's duties. Effective January 1, 2013.

House Bill 3636

Topic: 
Mechanics Lien Act
(Burke, D-Evergreen Park; Mulroe, D-Chicago) does three things in response to the LaSalle Bank National Association vs. Cypress Creek opinion. (1) Requires that the owner or interested person’s demand for suit to be commenced or answered within 30 days must contain this language in at least 10-point, boldface type: “Failure to respond to this notice within 30 days after receipt, as required by Section 34 of the Mechanics Lien Act, shall result in the forfeiture of the referenced lien.” (2) Defines a “lien creditor” as someone who does work or furnishes material under this Act for improvements. A lien creditor is preferred over other encumbrances except that previous encumbrances are preferred only to the extent of the value of the land at the time the contract was made for the improvements, and each lien creditor is preferred to the value of all later improvements regardless of whether the lien creditor provided those improvements. (3) If the sale proceeds are insufficient to satisfy claims of both prior encumbrances and lien creditors, the sale proceeds are to be distributed as follows: (a) Any previous encumbrance has a paramount lien in the portion of the proceeds attributable to the value of the land at the time of making of the contract for improvements. (b) Any lien creditors have a paramount lien in the portion of the proceeds attributable to all later improvements made to the property. It has an immediate effective date. House Bill 3636 is in the House awaiting concurrence on Senate Amendment No. 2.

Senate Bill 16

Topic: 
Fast-track mortgage forecosure
(Collins, D-Chicago; Lyons, D-Chicago) creates an expedited judgment and sale procedure for abandoned residential property. An additional filing fee will be imposed on plaintiffs in a tiered system in which the fees increase in proportion to the number of foreclosures a plaintiff prosecutes. The fees will also pay for "housing counseling" for residents who are going through the foreclosure process in effort to help them save their homes. Clarifies that a portion of the Conveyances Act is permissive instead of mandatory to prevent that portion of the Act from affecting the validity of a properly recorded mortgage by a trustee in bankruptcy. House Amendment 8 becomes the bill and is positioned to move during this veto session.