- Opinion 14-05 | Conflict of Interest | Conflict of Interest - Personal Interests | Government Representation | Prosecutors
- Opinion 14-02 | Communication With Unrepresented Person | Plea Agreements | Prosecutors
- Opinion 13-07 | Conflict of Interest | Government Representation | Prosecutors
-
Opinion 03-06 |
Contingent Fees | Division of Fees | Prosecutors
Law firm can properly pay former partner share of contingent fee earned after partner left firm to become State’s Attorney as long as payment is part of separation agreement under Rule 1.5(j) and payment does not violate public policy concerns; former partner’s disqualification from private practice as State’s Attorney does not bar payment to former partner of share of fee earned by firm after partner withdrew when paid as part of separation agreement; former partner sharing fee under Rule 1.5(j) need not retain responsibility for matter, share fee proportionally to service performed,
- Opinion 94-16 | Government Representation | Prosecutors
- Opinion 93-12 | Ex Parte Communications | Prosecutors
- Opinion 93-08 | Conflict of Interest | Prosecutors
- Opinion 92-19 | Prosecutors
- Opinion 92-18 | Conflict of Interest | Lawyer Representing Lawyer | Prosecutors
- Opinion 91-01 | Conflict of Interest | Prosecutors
- Opinion 91-27 | Board of Directors | Law Reform Activities | Prosecutors
- Opinion 91-22 | Prosecutors
- Opinion 90-29 | Prosecutors
- Opinion 89-04 | Communication With Represented Person | Prosecutors
- Opinion 89-02 | Prosecutors | Referral Fees and Arrangements
- Opinion 88-10 | Communication With Represented Person | Prosecutors
- Opinion 86-04 | Government Representation | Prosecutors
- Opinion 86-02 | Prosecutors
- Opinion 871 | Prosecutors
- Opinion 84-05 | Government Representation | Imputed Disqualification | Prosecutors
- Opinion 852 | Government Representation | Prosecutors
- Opinion 789 | Prosecutors
- Opinion 729 | Imputed Disqualification | Prosecutors