Articles From Michael R. Lied

Editor’s note By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, December 2009 In October 2009, President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2010. Under the NDAA, qualifying “exigency leave” now allows an eligible employee to take leave for a qualifying exigency related to the deployment of a son/daughter or parent who is a member of a regular component of the armed forces.
Reference release overcomes tortious interference claim By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, December 2009 Under Illinois law, if a written release is clear and unambiguous, the court determines the parties’ intent from the plain language of the document. 
Apprenticeship loan not dischargeable in bankruptcy By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, September 2009 Michael Kesler was undoubtedly surprised that he could not discharge a union apprenticeship program loan in bankruptcy court.
Criminal prosecution under the Occupational Safety and Health Act By MIchael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, September 2009 Employers do not typically think about the possibility of criminal liability under the Occupational Safety and Health Act. However, Section 17(e) of the Act punishes any employer convicted of willfully violating any standard, rule, order or regulation prescribed pursuant to the Act, if that violation caused an employee’s death. 
Editor’s note By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, September 2009 In St. Aubin v. Unilever HPC NA, Civil Action No. 09 C 1874 (N.D. Ill. June 26, 2009), the court considered the applicability of Pyett.
Federal labor law preempts Illinois antitrust claim By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, September 2009 A summary of the case of Smart v. Local 702 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.
Borrowed employee has retaliatory discharge claim By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, June 2009 In a case of first impression, the Illinois Appellate Court determined that an employee of a staffing company could sue the company’s customer for retaliatory discharge.
Discharge for misconduct cuts off temporary total disability benefits By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, May 2009 A summary of the case of Interstate Scaffolding, Inc. v. The Workers’ Compensation Commission, et al.
“Last chance” agreement fails to bar retaliation claim By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, May 2009 Last chance agreements are relatively common in unionized work settings.
Your IT personnel have become child porn cops By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, May 2009 Under a recent amendment to the Illinois Abused and Neglected Child Reporting Act, there is a new obligation on certain Illinois workers to report child pornography which they discover on the job.
Employment claims based on association with another person By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, December 2008 You can imagine the unseen narrator on Desperate Housewives, Mary Alice Young, saying something like this: Relationships: From birth we begin to form relationships with others. Our deepest relationships are usually with close family members. Those relationships can bring incredible joy, but sometimes also carry legal entanglements.
Illinois acts to protect biometric information By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, December 2008 Illinois recently enacted the Biometric Information Privacy Act, Public Act 95-0994.
Employee has claim for harassing workplace behavior not directed at her By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, September 2008 Reeves worked as a Transportation Sales Representative for C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (“CHRW”) in its Birmingham, Alabama branch office. She was the only female TSR in the office.
Employee lawfully discharged after objecting to disclosing protected health information By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, September 2008 Rockwell Lime Company, seeking competitive bids for group health insurance, requested its employees authorize the disclosure of their protected health information to insurance companies for the purpose of pre-enrollment underwriting and risk rating.
Employer loses insurance coverage for failure to timely report a claim of discrimination By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, September 2008 The lesson here? Read your policy requirements. Arrowood Indemnity Co. refused to defend Westrec Marine Management Co., because Westrec failed to timely report a claim of discrimination.
Employer’s confidentiality policy violates labor law By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, September 2008 The NLRB alleged that Northeastern Land Services, Ltd. violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act by maintaining, in its employment contracts, an overbroad confidentiality provision, and by terminating employee Dupuy for breaching that policy.
Memorizing secret information may violate Trade Secrets Act By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, September 2008 Al Minor & Associates, Inc., (“AMA”) is an actuarial firm that designs and administers retirement plans and that employs pension analysts who work with approximately 500 clients.
Plaintiff’s prior lawsuits and mental health treatment may be admissible evidence By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, September 2008 In September 2003, Davis began employment with Lincare as a full-time healthcare specialist. Lincare’s area manager, Kline, promoted her to center manager in June 2004.
Using e-mail to create a contract By Michael R. Lied Business and Securities Law, August 2008 There are a lot of ways to create a contract. Not surprisingly, courts are now beginning to find that an exchange of e-mails can be sufficient.
EEOC issues guidance on employment testing By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, June 2008 The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently released a fact sheet that provides employers guidance on employment related testing and selection methods.
Employer’s test for tobacco use might violate ERISA By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, June 2008 A summary of Rodrigues v. The Scotts Co., LLC and EG Sys., Inc., d/b/a Scotts Lawnservice.
Employer’s challenge to unemployment benefits may be evidence of unlawful retaliation By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, February 2008 In Burlington Northern & Santa Fe R.R. Co. v. White, ___ U.S. ___, 126 S. Ct. 2405 (2006), the Supreme Court held that an employee subjected to employer conduct, whether inside or outside the workplace, that might dissuade an objectively reasonable worker from making or supporting a charge of discrimination, suffers a sufficiently adverse action to state a retaliation claim under Title VII.
NLRB modifies recognition bar rule By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, February 2008 The time-honored way in which employees select a union representative has been through a secret ballot conducted by the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”).
Private investigator’s actions lead to invasion of privacy claim By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, February 2008 Private investigators can be a helpful tool for business. However, it is important to assure that the investigation does not cross over the line to create an invasion of privacy.
Negotiating separation agreements By Michael R. Lied Business and Securities Law, January 2008 Employers frequently seek to avoid or resolve litigation related to terminating an employee by having the other party sign a release or waiver.
Anti-Pretexting Statute By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, November 2007 Hewlett-Packard’s Chairman, Patricia Dunn, was allegedly upset about leaks to the media about the company’s long term strategic plans. Hewlett-Packard retained an outside firm to gain access to its directors’ phone records, believing that one or more directors were the source of the leak.
Private investigator’s actions lead to invasion of privacy claim By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, November 2007 Private investigators can be a helpful tool for business. However, it is important to assure that the investigation does not cross over the line to create an invasion of privacy.
Union not entitled to employee e-mail addresses By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, November 2007 In Trustees of Columbia University, Case 2-RC-22355 (August 9, 2007), a majority of a panel of the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) found the employer did not violate the law when it refused to provide the union with e-mail addresses of eligible voters.
Does a manager have to express happiness that a subordinate is pregnant? By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, August 2007 Probably not. However, failure to do so was one issue considered significant in a pregnancy discrimination case. Asmo v. Keane, Inc., 471 F.3d 588 (6th Cir. 2006).
EEOC issues guidance on workers with caregiving responsibilities By Michael R. Lied Labor and Employment Law, August 2007 In May 2007, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued guidance on workers with caregiving responsibilities.

Spot an error in your article? Contact Celeste Niemann at cniemann@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article, visit the ISBA Newsletters page.

Select a Different Author