Primer on copyright lawBy Peter LaSorsaFederal Civil Practice, March 2008Sophisticated digital equipment like handheld scanners, cellular telephones with built in cameras, and the easy accessibility of protected works via the Internet, are making the task of copying another’s work relatively easy, cheap and unsophisticated.
Intellectual property protection at a glanceBy Alan R. SingletonBusiness and Securities Law, February 2008Compare the different forms of intellectual property protection from this handy reference chart.
Business entity selection at a glanceBy Alan R. SingletonIntellectual Property, January 2008A table to assist with your business entity selection questions.
Drawing a line between art and copyrightBy Margo Lynn HablutzelIntellectual Property, January 2008Art can also be the center of intellectual property controversies, as recent charges of copyright infringement have shown.
Protecting trade secrets in cyberspaceBy Anne C. Keays & Mitchell S. ChabanIntellectual Property, January 2008This article will review the facts and findings in QSRSoft, Inc. v. Restaurant Technology Inc., a recent Northern District of Illinois opinion, and examine the court’s reasoning as guidance on measures to take in protection of trade secrets for Internet based systems.
Securing and collecting intellectual property collateralBy Daniel KeganCommercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy, December 2007Intellectual property has become a salient, yet confusing, asset in national and global business and financing.
“Pull My Finger Fred” gets his day in courtBy Steven L. Baron & Lindsay H. LaVineIntellectual Property, September 2007For years to come, Illinois courts will cite the JCW Investments case (or the “farting doll” case, as it is affectionately known) for the proposition that federal law does not preempt state law in the realm of punitive damages. Who would have thought that Pull My Finger Fred would be such a pioneer?
Intellectual property law for the general practice attorneyBy Preston H. Smirman & David A. BurnsLabor and Employment Law, March 2007While the topic of IP law may seem intimidating, the intended purpose of this article is to “demystify” this area of the law.
Pulling the Plug on “The Electric (Slide)”By Margo Lynn HablutzelIntellectual Property, March 2007Thousands of guests at weddings, bas mitzvah, Sweet Sixteen parties, company holiday gatherings, and other events have been cajoled into joining a line dance called “The Electric Slide” over the last thirty years.
World Intellectual Property Organization proposes new Initiative regarding trademarks for drug namesBy Alpana P. Sahu, K. & Pradip K. SahuInternational and Immigration Law, March 2007From November 13th to the 17th, 2006, the World Intellectual Property Organization’s Standing Committee on Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications (the “Standing Committee) met in Geneva, Switzerland to discuss numerous issues relating to trademark law and practice.
Select Illinois case law on non-disclosure agreements and trade secretsBy Steven L. Baron & Kristin L. LingrenIntellectual Property, January 2007The following is a compilation of significant and/or factually interesting cases addressing issues that directly or indirectly affect the enforceability of nondisclosure agreements in Illinois.
What’s in a name?By Margo Lynn HablutzelIntellectual Property, January 2007Recent activity in the UK and USA have highlighted a celebrity’s use of name or nickname as a trademark.
Protecting ‘Works of the Human Spirit’ worldwideBy Caitlyn McEvoyInternational and Immigration Law, August 2006The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) is one of the many agencies of the United Nations headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland. Its main objective is to protect and promote the use of intellectual property, deemed as “works of the human spirit.”
Intellectual Improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, June 2006Data Gone. Jacob Citrin, accused of wiping out all the data on the computer he used at work before he announced his resignation faces a lawsuit by his former employer, a group of affiliated real estate companies, under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act., 18 USC 1030.
Common mistakes by trademark owners in Mexico, and how to avoid themBy Jaime CastilloIntellectual Property, March 2006Ed Note. The world is reportedly shrinking, NAFTA may be furthering commerce in this hemisphere, exports are an important segment of the Illinois economy, and the Hispanic consumer market is growing. Jaime Castillo summarizes some common mistakes made by US trademark owners in Mexico, and even answers how to avoid them.
Legal wrinkles in sponsored linksBy Steven L. Baron & William BeattieIntellectual Property, March 2006Like everyone else schooled in a brick-and-mortar world, trademark attorneys and the courts are struggling to apply decades-old trademark law principles to the universe of the World Wide Web.
When to file for Federal trademark registrationBy Justin LampelIntellectual Property, March 2006It is a common misconception that having a business name approved by the Secretary of State’s Office provides trademark rights
Charity solicitation confusionBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, December 2005The Lanham Act may be the major statute regulating trademarks, banning unfair competition, and dealing with consumer confusion, but there are many other relevant laws.
Corporate assumed name basicsBy Jodi K. PlagenzIntellectual Property, December 2005What if a corporation, for marketing or other business purposes, decides to use a name other than its legal name without making it ‘official’?