Trademark protection in China: An overviewBy Pradip K. SahuInternational and Immigration Law, September 2003Many businesses in the United States see China as "the final frontier" because it is a rapidly developing nation with great potential for economic growth.
“Common Law” trademark protection in Japan?By Jiri M. Mestecky & Koya UemuraIntellectual Property, August 2003There is a common misperception among intellectual property attorneys and businesspeople in "common law" countries, such as the United States, that "civil law" countries, such as Japan, France, Germany and others, provide little or no protection for unregistered trademarks.
International trademark protection: A brand new way in the U.S.A.By Pradip K. SahuInternational and Immigration Law, May 2003On November 2, 2002, President Bush signed into law the legislation that will make the United States a member of the Madrid Protocol for the International Registration of Marks (The Madrid Protocol).
Copyright birth & death announcementsBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, October 2002Copyright death approaches for older unpublished works. Pre-1978 works that did not receive copyright protection before 1978 may, unless the works are published before January 2003, become public domain.
ICANN Stockholm falloutBy Adria MorrisIntellectual Property, October 2002If anyone blinked in June 2001, they might have missed the cursory press coverage of the ICANN quarterly meeting in Stockholm. For anyone that is involved in the domain name industry, which many of us are, a few items deserve special attention.
Intellectual Improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, October 2002The Official Gazette for Patents stopped paper publication September 25, 2002; electronic publication on CD-ROM began October 1, 2002.
ISBA Intellectual Property contentsIntellectual Property, October 2002Baron, Steven L. and Anne C. Brynn. "Another roadblock on the way to proving trade dress in product configuration: Traffix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc."
The law of privacy: past, present and futureIntellectual Property, October 2002Studies indicate that 92 percent of consumers are concerned about the misuse of their personal information online, and that concern is estimated to result in potential losses of up to $20 billion by 2002.
Intellectual improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, June 2002Douglas Dorhauer, a student at Louisiana State University school of law maintains the lsulaw.com Web site.
Property v. PrivacyBy David LoundyIntellectual Property, June 2002An interesting exploration of the ability to monitor telephone records is found in Schmidt v. Ameritech Illinois, 2002 Ill.App. LEXIS 220 (Mar. 29, 2002).
Inventor rights: Chou v. The University of ChicagoBy Robert H. ResisIntellectual Property, April 2002The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has recently ruled that a putative inventor who lacks a potential ownership interest in a patent still has standing to sue for correction of inventorship of the patent based on an alleged "concrete financial interest in the patent."
Trademark Trial and Appeals Board issues first dilution decisionBy John E. LyhusIntellectual Property, April 2002The Trademark Trial and Appeals Board of the United States Patent and Trademark Office has revealed the high barrier a trademark must surmount to be considered famous under the Federal Trademark Dilution Act (FTDA).
UCITA is coming! UCITA is coming! (One if by land, two if by C)By Eugene F. FriedmanIntellectual Property, April 2002The Illinois General Assembly has recently witnessed the introduction of the Uniform Computer Information Transfer Act ("UCITA"), 1999 Illinois Senate Bill 1309.
Intellectual property protection in ChinaBy Lu GuoliangInternational and Immigration Law, January 2002I am pleased to have this opportunity to introduce some of the efforts made by the Chinese government in improving the investment environment and protecting intellectual property.
Is that boat really intended for this safe harbor?By David LoundyIntellectual Property, January 2002One of the few parts of the "Communications Decency Act" (47 U.S.C. §230) left standing after the Supreme Court invalidated the statute's motivating provisions (see Reno v. ACLU, 117 S.Ct. 2329, 2334 (1997).)
ISBA advisory ethics opinions on WebIntellectual Property, January 2002ISBA Advisory Opinions on Professional Conduct are posted and available on ISBA's Web site, <http://www.isba.org/EthicsOpinions/>.
Organic foods and labelsIntellectual Property, January 2002Trademark counsel often review labels and packaging. The federal government has issued new rules defining what constitutes an organic food.
Bankruptcy treatment of ipso facto clauses in intellectual property licensesBy Beverly A. BernemanIntellectual Property, December 2001Attorneys who insert an "ipso facto clause" into an intellectual property license hope to give their client an "out" in the event that the other party files a bankruptcy.
Copyright Office e-mail newsletter, NewsNet, availableIntellectual Property, December 2001To subscribe to the Copyright Office's e-mail newsletter, fill in the Web form <http://www.loc.gov/copyright/ newsnet/subchange.html"> or send an e-mail message to <LISTSERV@loc.gov> and in the body of the message say: Subscribe USCopyright
Free ISBA case serviceIntellectual Property, December 2001Striving to meet the needs of members, ISBA expanded its free e-mail case law update service to 12,000 members.