Child Law

Public Act 99-879

Topic: 
Juvenile probation

(Nekritz, D-Buffalo Grove; Raoul, D-Chicago) prohibits a minor from being incarcerated for a Class 3 or 4 felony violation of the Illinois Controlled Substances Act. It makes an exception for a third or subsequent judicial finding of a violation of probation for substantial noncompliance with court-ordered treatment or programming. Limits the current five-year mandatory probation to minors found guilty of first-degree murder, and probation terms for Class X and forcible felonies are reduced to a minimum of three years, two years, or 18 months depending on the offense. Requires the court to schedule probation hearings for various offenses to determine whether it is in the best interest of the minor and public safety to terminate probation after the minimum period of probation has been served. Creates a rebuttable presumption that it is in the best interest of the minor and public safety to terminate probation.

Effective January 1, 2017.

 

Public Act 99-835

Topic: 
Expungement of juvenile records

(Barbara Wheeler, R-Crystal Lake; Raoul, D-Chicago) allows a person to petition for expungement at any time for an offense occurring before their 18th birthday if no petition for delinquency was filed, the minor was charged with an offense but the petition was dismissed without a finding of delinquency, the minor was found not delinquent, the minor was placed on juvenile court supervision, or the minor was adjudicated for an offense that if committed by an adult would be a Class B or C misdemeanor or petty offense.

Effective January 1, 2017. 

Public Act 99-882

Topic: 
Access to a lawyer

(Van Pelt, D-Chicago; Currie, D-Chicago) does three things. (1) Raises the age from 13 to 15 in which a lawyer is required to represent a minor during custodial interrogation in a homicide or sex-offense case; (2) expands current custodial interrogation videotape requirements to apply to all felonies and misdemeanor sex-offense cases for minors under the age of 18; and (3) sets out the specific wording for Miranda warnings for all minors under the age of 18.

Effective January 1, 2017. 

Public Act 99-821

Topic: 
Personal guardian

(Fine, D-Glenview; Silverstein, D-Chicago) amends the personal guardian statute in the Probate Code. If there is no court order to the contrary, requires the guardian to use reasonable efforts to notify the ward’s known adult children, who have requested notification and provided contact information, of the ward’s admission to a hospital or hospice program, the arrangements for the disposition of the ward’s remains, or the ward’s death.

If a guardian unreasonably prevents an adult child of the ward from visiting the ward, the court, upon a verified petition by an adult child, may order the guardian to permit visitation between the ward and the adult child if the court finds that the visitation is in the ward’s best interests. In making its determination, the court shall consider the standards set forth in current law. subsection (e) of this Section. This new subsection (g) does not apply to duly appointed Public Guardians and the Office of State Guardian. 

Effective January 1, 2017.

 

 

Public Act 99-763

Topic: 
IMDMA

(Kelly Burke, D-Oak Lawn; Mulroe, D-Chicago) is a cleanup of last year’s rewrite of the IMDMA for such things as referring to a section that no longer exists and correcting cross-references. It does contain some clarifying changes that may be considered as substantive, such as the following. (1) Clarifies for post-educational expenses that the guide is “in-state” tuition at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. (2) Clarifies that the 25-mile standard on relocation is based on an “internet mapping service.” (3) Clarifies the two-year ban from amending a judgment applies only to “parental decision-making responsibilities” and doesn’t apply to “parenting-time” provisions. (4) Clarifies that a respondent who doesn’t file an appearance is not required to file a parenting plan unless specifically ordered to do so by the court. (5) It also includes a new Article 7 of the Parentage Act of 2015 affecting artificial reproduction that replaces the current Article that is considered to be outdated.

Effective January 1, 2017. 

In re Aniylah B.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Neglected Minor
Citation
Case Number: 
153662
Decision Date: 
Friday, August 12, 2016
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook County
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
Hall

Respondent appeals an order finding that her daughter was a neglected minor based on an injurious environment. On appeal, Respondent contends the court erred by taking judicial notice of transcripts and exhibits admitted at a prior proceeding for temporary custody. None of the court’s rulings in connection with the admission of the evidence from the temporary custody hearing were arbitrary, fanciful, or so unreasonable that they amounted to an abuse of discretion. Respondent also argued that the finding that her daughter was neglected was against the manifest weight of the evidence. State proved by a preponderance of the evidence that Respondent's daughter was a neglected minor. Respondent did not consistently participate in drug testing, her participation in the domestic violence services was superficial, and she failed to appreciate the harm domestic violence did to her children. (ROCHFORD and DELORT, concurring.)

Public Act 99-718

Topic: 
IDVA electronic filing pilot program

(McAuliffe, R-Chicago; Morrison, D-Deerfield) authorizes the Illinois Supreme Court to adopt rules to establish a pilot program for the electronic filing of petitions for temporary orders of protection and the issuance of those orders by audio-visual means. Its intent is to accommodate litigants for whom attendance in court would be an undue hardship or risk harm to them.

Effective January 1, 2017.  

Public Act 99-697

Topic: 
Possession of cannabis

(Steans, D-Chicago; Cassidy, D-Chicago) makes several changes to the Code of Criminal Procedure. It replaces criminal penalties for possession of small amounts of cannabis (less than 10 grams) with a civil fine of $100-$200. It also replaces the current "zero-tolerance" prohibition of driving with any trace of cannabis in the driver's bodily fluids with a per se standard of five nanograms/milliliter of whole blood or 10 nanograms/milliliter in any other bodily substance. (For more, see the LawPulse item "Another try for pot decriminalization" in the May 2016 Bar Journal.) Effective July 29, 2016.