Child Law

House Bill 3172

Topic: 
Juvenile Court Act
(Tracy, R-Brown County; Clayborne, D- E. St. Louis) amends the “continuance under supervision” section (Section 615) to track the procedure followed in adult criminal court. Senate Amendment No. 1 does the following: (1) Leaves current law so that a case may be continued under supervision before a finding of delinquency with the approval of the state’s attorney. “A finding of delinquency” is a bright line that should prevent some of the confusion caused by the inconsistency of the current language. It leaves current law that this option is not available for any forcible felony, a Class X felony, and first-degree murder. (2) Amends § 615 so that after a court makes a finding of delinquency, the court may continue the case under supervision. It adds the same criteria from the supervision statute in the Criminal Code that the judge must consider before ordering supervision. (730 ILCS 5/5-6-1). It recites current law that this option is not available for any forcible felony, a Class X felony, and first-degree murder. House Bill 3172 is on second reading in the Senate after passing the House.

House Bill 2404

Topic: 
Juvenile court jurisdiction
(Currie, D-Chicago; Steans, D-Chicago) raises the age of jurisdiction for juvenile court from 17 to 18 for most felony offenses. The jurisdictional age for misdemeanor offenses was raised from 17 to 18 several years ago, and after the Illinois Juvenile Justice Commission studied the benefits of that change, recommended that it be extended to most felonies. Essentially, House Bill 2404 would align our juvenile court jurisdiction with 38 other states, the federal government, and common culture. Passed the House and is on third reading in the Senate awaiting a vote.

Senate Bill 31

Topic: 
Collaborative law for family law cases
(Noland, D-Elgin) codifies by statute the Uniform Law Commission’s proposed alternative dispute resolution for family law cases that is now being done by private agreement between litigants. It includes a variety of process requirements such as treatment of settlement communications as confidential, establishment of an evidentiary privilege for settlement discussions, lawyer disqualification if the process fails, and informal discovery procedures. Held in Senate Judiciary Committee.

In re A.P.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Abuse and Neglect
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL App (3d) 120672
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, April 2, 2013
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Peoria Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
LYTTON
(Court opinion corrected 4/22/13.) Although the Respondent, who was later identified as the infant's biological father, was not named in juvenile abuse and neglect petition, petition put Respondent on notice that his fitness would be at issue at combined adjudication and dispositional hearing. (HOLDRIDGE and O'BRIEN, concurring.)

House Bill 2992

Topic: 
Visitation
(Harms, R-Watseka) allows a court to consider, consistent with the best interest of the child, whether to award to one or both of the parties the “right of first refusal” to provide child care for the minor child or children during the other parent’s normal parenting time. Although the parties may agree to a right of first refusal, if they do not, and the court determines that a right of first refusal is in the best interest of the child, the court shall consider new statutory criteria and make provisions for it consistent with the best interest of the child. It doesn’t affect use of a substitute child-care provider for emergency situations and applies only if a party intends to leave the minor child or children with a substitute child-care provider for a significant period of time. Passed the House and on first reading in the Senate.

House Bill 2404

Topic: 
Juvenile Court Act
Juvenile court jurisdiction. House Bill 2404 (Currie) raises the age of jurisdiction for juvenile court from 17 to 18 for most felony offenses. The jurisdictional age for misdemeanor offenses was raised from 17 to 18 several years ago, and after the Illinois Juvenile Justice Commission studied the benefits of that change, recommended that it be extended to most felonies. Essentially, House Bill 2404 would align our juvenile court jurisdiction with 38 other states, the federal government, and common culture. It is on third reading in the House awaiting a vote.

In re Aaron L.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Abuse and Neglect
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL App (1st) 122808
Decision Date: 
Friday, March 29, 2013
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co.,1st Div.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
CUNNINGHAM
Court erred in failing to make written findings relating to health, safety and best interest of the public, as required by Section 2-31(2) of Juvenile Court Act, and failing to explain how it was in minor's best interest to close wardship case and terminate minor's wardship and guardianship. Although minor testified that he wished for case to remain open so he could participate in drug treatment, and that he would live with his sister if he could not remain at transitional youth home, court made no express specific findings of fact as to minor's wishes as to case closure or manner of living independently. Minor's lack of cooperation and failure to avail himself of service is not alone sufficient basis to terminate guardianship. (ROCHFORD and DELORT, concurring.)

In re A.M.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Guardianship
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL App (3d) 120809
Decision Date: 
Wednesday, March 20, 2013
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Tazewell Co.
Holding: 
Reversed.
Justice: 
SCHMIDT
Court lacked jurisdiction to proceed on merits of guardianship petition of minors filed by minors' maternal aunt, as court did not first hold evidentiary hearing as to respondent mother's willingness and ability to care for her children. A separate hearing must be held first on parental fitness, and only if the presumption of fitness is rebutted in that hearing does the court have jurisdiction to proceed to determine whether guardianship is in the best interests of the minor. (CARTER and LYTTON, concurring.)