Commercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy

In the Matter of: Aguirre

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
Bankruptcy
Citation
Case Number: 
Nos. 21-2681 et al. Cons.
Decision Date: 
June 16, 2022
Federal District: 
N.D. Ill., E. Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed

Dist. Ct. could properly find that Bankruptcy Ct.’s approval of debtors’ Chapter 11 reorganization plan that provided for, among other things, debtors’ payment of $65,000 to creditor for its tax lien essentially knocked out creditor’s tax lien on debtors’ property, even though creditor was never served with process regarding debtors’ proposed reorganization plan. While creditor contended that plan of reorganization did not affect it’s lien, because it had not been served with process regarding said plan by time plan had been entered, record established that creditor was “party” with respect to said Bankruptcy Ct. proceedings, and thus was bound by terms of reorganization plan due to creditor’s concession that it was party, as well as due to actions taken by creditor’s counsel, which included negotiating and obtaining better terms under proposed plan and claiming rights under said plan. Ct. further noted confirmed plan knocked out any entitlement that creditor may once have had to obtain tax deed and foreclose on said lien.

Public Act 102-1065

Topic: 
Contractors and subcontractors

(Evans, D-Chicago; Castro, D-Chicago) amends Public Act 102-1067 as follows: (1) Makes it applicable if the private work’s aggregate costs of the project exceed $20,000. (2) Deletes liability under this Act for a primary contractor to “a third party on a wage claimant’s behalf incurred pursuant to this Act by a subcontractor.” (3) Clarifies that primary contractors who are parties to a collective bargaining agreement on the work being performed is exempt from liability under this Section. (Instead of being exempt from “specified provisions.”) (4) Exempts primary contractors from liability under this Section for the alteration or repair of an existing single-family dwelling or to a single residential-unit in an existing multi-unit structure. (5) Creates the Bond Reform in the Construction Industry Task Force. This Act takes effect June 10, 2022. 

Public Act 102-1076

Topic: 
Contractors and subcontractors

(Evans, D-Chicago; Castro, D-Elgin) amends the Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act to make a “primary contractor” engaged in construction of a structure to assume and be liable for any debt owed to a claimant incurred under this Act by a subcontractor at any tier acting under, by, or for the primary contractor. House Bill 5412 applies to any contract entered into on or after July 1, 2022. 

It exempts any work performed by a contractor of the federal government, the State, or unit of local government. Provides that the primary contractor's liability under the new provisions extends only to any unpaid wages or fringe or other benefit payments or contributions, including interest owed, penalties assessed by the Department, and reasonable attorney’s fees, but does not extend to liquidated damages. Primary contractors who are parties to a collective bargaining agreement on the work being performed are exempt from specified provisions. Effective June 10, 2022.  
 

Public Act 102-908

Topic: 
Civil practice

(Cunningham, D-Chicago; Keicher, R-Sycamore) allows a defendant to plead a set-off or counterclaim barred by the statute of limitation or the statute of repose. Current law only allows a set-off or counterclaim that is barred by the statute of limitation. The changes made to this Section apply to claims initiated on or after its effective date and to claims intentionally filed to preclude a defendant a reasonable opportunity to file a counterclaim within the original limitation period. Effective on May 27, 2020.

Public Act 102-896

Topic: 
Human Rights Act and real estate transactions

(Ford, D-Chicago; Villivalam, D-Chicago) amends the Illinois Human Rights Act to declare Illinois’ public policy is to prevent discrimination based on source of income in real estate transactions. Defines “source of income” as the lawful manner by which an individual is supported and their dependents are supported. Makes it a civil rights violation for specified discriminatory actions because of an individual’s source of income. Effective January 1, 2023.

Bank of America N.A. v. Yun

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Civil Procedure
Citation
Case Number: 
2022 IL App (3d) 210210
Decision Date: 
Wednesday, May 18, 2022
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Will Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, remanded.
Justice: 
O'BRIEN

Creditor plaintiff filed a complaint against defendant alleging breach of contract after defendant failed to pay his credit card account. Defendant in his answer alleged affirmative defenses and counterclaims, including claims that the plaintiff violated the federal Truth in Lending Act and FCRA. The trial court granted plaintiff’s motion to dismiss defendant’s counterclaim and defendant appealed arguing the plaintiff did not provide any affirmative matter to negate the counterclaim. The appellate court reversed, finding that plaintiff offered “evidence that refutes a well-pleaded fact of the complaint,” rather than an affirmative matter, but affirmed a trial court order denying defendant’s motion to amend the counterclaim to include a prayer for punitive damages. (DAUGHERITY and HOLDRIDGE, concurring)

Public Act 102-765

Topic: 
Residential Real Estate Disclosure Act

(Tarver, D-Chicago; Sims, D-Chicago) is the first major update of the Residential Real Estate Disclosure Act since its enactment in 1994. Among its many changes include allowing for electronic delivery and notice of the disclosure and harmonizes this Act with the newer Illinois Trust Code and the Transfer on Death Instrument Act. It also clarifies that a seller does not waive being exempt if a disclosure report is nevertheless delivered. It also includes additional consumer protections for the buyer. Effective May 13, 2022. 

City of Chicago v. Mance

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
Bankruptcy
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 21-1355
Decision Date: 
April 21, 2022
Federal District: 
N.D. Ill., E. Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed

Dist. Ct. did not err in confirming Bankruptcy Ct. order, finding that plaintiff-City’s possessory lien on defendant-debtor’s vehicle that it impounded due to unpaid tickets was “judicial lien” that was avoidable in bankruptcy under 11 USC section 522(f). Record showed that at time of debtor’s bankruptcy filing, City’s lien on her vehicle totaled $12,245 and that her vehicle was worth only $3,000. Also, instant lien qualified as judicial lien, where, prior to City obtaining instant impoundment lien, debtor underwent certain quasi-judicial proceedings that generated findings that debtor owed specific fines and other costs arising out of issuance of traffic tickets. Moreover, without said quasi-judicial proceedings, City could not impose lien on indebted driver’s vehicle. As such, instant lien did not qualify as “statutory lien” that would not be avoidable in bankruptcy because instant lien did not arise solely by statute.