Construction Law

Construction Law

Cabrera v. ESI Consultants, Ltd.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Construction Contracts
Citation
Case Number: 
2015 IL App (1st) 140933
Decision Date: 
Friday, September 18, 2015
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 5th Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
GORDON
Plaintiff was injured while working on construction project on Washington Street bridge in Chicago; his employer had contracted with City to do certain work on project, including sandblasting and painting bridge. Plaintiff sued City, and two subcontractors. Court properly granted summary judgment for all Defendants. Neither subcontractor entrusted work to employer and retained control over employer’s work such that they would owe a duty to Plaintiff under Section 414 of Restatement (Second) of Torts. Contracts between subcontractors and employer did not state that subcontractors would supervise employer in manner in which its workers did their work. Contract with City provided that City’s supervision of employer was discretionary, so that City is immune pursuant to Section 2-201 of Tort Immunity Act. (REYES and McBRIDE, concurring.)

GX Chicago, LLC v. Galaxy Environmental, Inc.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Mechanics Lien Act
Citation
Case Number: 
2015 IL App (1st) 133624
Decision Date: 
Monday, July 27, 2015
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 1st Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
CUNNINGHAM
Dispute over mechanics liens arising from construction project to develop real property owned by Plaintiff. Court correctly construed language of Section 30 of Mechanics Lien Act that "the court shall find the amount due from the owner to the contractor" to refer to the amount due from owner to lien claimants' immediate contractor. Court correctly found that outstanding amount owed on contract between general contractor and subcontractor limited funds recoverable from Plaintiff and general contractor to satisfy liens of that subcontractor and its subcontractors. When parties to relevant contract have agreed as to amount owed on contract, there is no longer a triable issue of material fact as to that amount, even if a non-party contends otherwise. It is consistent with liberal construction of Mechanics Lien Act to permit court, in its equitable discretion, to require deposit of funds and thus extinguish liens of subcontractors. (CONNORS and HARRIS, concurring.)

Public Act 99-93

Topic: 
Citation to discover assets
(Silverstein, D-Chicago; Gordon-Booth, D-Peoria) expands its reach to compel appearance before the court of any person whom the petitioner believes may be liable to the estate of a ward under any civil cause of action. Also expands the statute to include “assets” in the person’s possession or control and or previously in person’s possession or control. Effective January 1, 2016.

Public Act 99-75

Topic: 
Property fraud alert system
(Greg Harris, D-Chicago; Cunningham, D-Chicago) provides that in a county that has a property-fraud alert system, a county recorder may create a registration form to register a property owner on the county’s property fraud alert system. A real estate professional may file the registration form with the recorder on behalf of a property owner. Real estate professionals must register with the county recorder before filing the registration forms on behalf of property owners. Effective January 1, 2016

Public Act 99-24

Topic: 
Mortgage foreclosure
(Mulroe, D-Chicago; Lang, D-Skokie) provides that a court is not required to appoint a special representative for a deceased mortgagor to defend the action if there is a (1) beneficiary under a transfer on death instrument; (2) person or entity that was conveyed title to the property by the deceased mortgagor prior to death; (3) person or entity that was conveyed title to the property under the administration of the deceased’s estate; or (4) trust that was conveyed title to the property. Effective January 1, 2016.

House Bill 2640

Topic: 
Condominium Property Act
(Cassidy, D-Chicago; Steans, D-Chicago) makes the following changes to the Condominium Property Act. (1) Bylaws must require that each unit owner receive a copy of the proposed annual budget at least 25 (instead of 30) days before adoption by the board of managers. (2) Authorizes a board to ratify and confirm actions taken in response to an emergency. Bylaws must require that the board of managers give notice to the unit owners of the emergency and general description of the actions taken because of the emergency within seven business days after the emergency. (3) Provides that the condominium instruments may be amended with the approval of, or notice to, any mortgagee or other lienholder of record if required under the provisions of the instruments. Current law is only “with the approval of any mortgagees required under the provisions of the condominium instruments.” (4) If there is an error in an instrument so that the instrument does not conform to the Act or other law, the association may correct the instrument by an amendment adopted by two-thirds of the board of managers without a unit-owner vote. If there is a provision in a condominium instrument requiring or allowing unit owners, mortgagees, or other lienholders of record to vote to approve an amendment to a condominium instrument, or for the mortgagees or other lienholders of record to be given notice of an amendment to a condominium instrument, that provision is not applicable to an amendment to the extent that the amendment corrects an omission, error, or inconsistency to conform the condominium instrument to the law. (5) Expands what a board may discuss in a closed session to include “information relating to” litigation, employment, and a unit owner’s unpaid share of common expenses. (6) Authorizes board members to participate in and act at any meeting of the board of managers in person, by telephonic means, or by use of any acceptable technological means in which all persons participating in the meeting can communicate with each other. This kind of participation constitutes attendance and presence in person at the meeting. (7) Amends the Common Interest Community Association Act. Deletes language providing that all provisions of the declaration, bylaws, and other community instruments severed by the Act shall be revised by the board of directors independent of the membership to comply with the Act. House Bill 2640 passed both chambers last week.

Senate Bill 1630

Topic: 
Judicial facilities fee
(Holmes, D-Aurora; Keith Wheeler, R-Oswego) authorizes the Kane County Board, with concurrence of the chief judge of the circuit, to impose a judicial facilities fee not to exceed $30. It will be imposed on civil litigants and defendants in criminal cases. Passed both chambers.