Construction Law

Construction Law

Senate Bill 1344

Topic: 
Common Interest Community Association Act
(Haine, D-Alton; Beiser, D-Alton) provides that no action to incorporate a common interest community as a municipality may commence until an instrument agreeing to incorporation has been signed by 51% (instead of two-thirds) of the members. Passed both chambers.

Senate Bill 804

Topic: 
Court-security fee
(Haine, D-Alton; Moffitt, R-Galesburg) allows the current court security-fee to exceed $25 for every party in a civil suit if it is set according to an acceptable cost study under the Counties Code. This fee is also added to a plea of guilty or conviction for defendants in traffic, ordinance, and criminal cases. Passed both chambers.

Senate Bill 1833

Topic: 
Personal Information Protection Act
(Biss, D-Skokie; Williams, D-Chicago) will expand the type of information that triggers a breach notification to consumers, including medical information outside of federal privacy laws, biometric data, contact information if combined with identifying information, and login credentials for online accounts. The bill also requires entities holding sensitive information to take “reasonable” steps to protect the information, to post a privacy policy describing their data collection practices, and to notify the Attorney General’s office when breaches occur. Entities will also have to notify the Attorney General’s Office in the event of a breach of geolocation information or consumer marketing information. Passed both chambers.

House Bill 2745

Topic: 
Municipal Code violations
(Andersson, R-Geneva; McConnaughy, R-St. Charles) creates an alternative proceeding to take place after the expiration of the time in which judicial review may be sought after a final determination of a code violation. If a defendant has failed to comply with a judgment to correct a code violation or pay a fine, any expenses incurred by a municipality to enforce the judgment shall be a debt due and owing the municipality by the defendant. Authorizes the municipality to impose a lien on the real estate or personal estate of the defendant in the amount of any debt due to the municipality. Permits a hearing officer to set aside any judgment entered by default and set a new hearing date if the hearing officer determines that the petitioner's failure to appear was for good cause or because the municipality did not provide proper service of process. Passed both chambers.

House Bill 2744

Topic: 
Boundary-line agreements
(Andersson, R-Geneva; McConnaughy, R-St. Charles) amends the Municipal Code to provide that it shall not be considered a “conflict” under the boundary-line provisions of this Section when a municipality that is a party to a jurisdictional boundary-line agreement cedes property within its own jurisdiction to another municipality not a party to the same jurisdictional boundary-line agreement. Passed both chambers.

House Bill 2644

Topic: 
Condominium Property Act
(Cassidy, D-Chicago; Steans, D-Chicago) makes it void as a matter of public policy if a provision in a condominium instrument purports to limit or restrict the representative rights of the board if it requires prior consent of the unit owners or requires arbitration or mediation of a dispute between the developer or one or more declarants under the condominium instruments. Deletes language providing that a provision in a declaration which would otherwise be void and ineffective may be enforced if it is approved by a vote of not less than 75% of the unit owners at any time after the election of the first unit-owner board of managers. Passed both chambers.

House Bill 2635

Topic: 
Mechanics Lien Act
(Sandack, R-Downers Grove; Harmon, D-Oak Park) allows a lien claimant to proceed directly against a bond substituted for the lien on the owner’s real estate or funds. The court may dismiss parties other than the principal, surety of the bond, and the lien claimant. Defenses against the lien claimant are limited to those that could be asserted by the principal or contracting owner. The “prevailing party” in an action brought under this new subsection shall be awarded its attorney fees. The “prevailing party” is defined as a lien claimant that recovers at least 75% of the amount of its lien claim, or the principal of the bond if the lien claimant recovers less than 25% of the amount of its lien claim. The attorney’s fees for a lien claimant that is a prevailing party is limited to the amount remaining on the bond after the payment of the claim and interest, and the attorney’s fees awarded to a bond principal shall be limited to 50% of the amount of the lien claim. Passed both chambers.

Senate Bill 45

Topic: 
Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act
(Barickman, R-Bloomington; Andersson, R-Geneva) simplifies the procedures to take the deposition of an Illinois person who is subpoenaed for discovery purposes from an out-of-state court. The Act creates establishes a simple, clerical procedure in which a subpoena from an out-of-state court is reissued as a discovery subpoena in Illinois. Passed both chambers.

O'Gorman v. F.H. Paschen

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Construction Contracts
Citation
Case Number: 
2015 IL App (1st) 133472
Decision Date: 
Friday, March 20, 2015
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 5th Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
GORDON
Plaintiff was injured while supervising a construction project at which Defendant company was operating as general contractor, and sued Defendant company on theory of common-law negligence. Court properly found that Defendant had not retained control over masonry subcontractor whose employees left a piece of wood with nail in it near roof hatch. Plaintiff stepped on nail and then fell through roof hatch. Defendant delegated duty for safety of work to subcontractor, and contract did not prohibit delegation.Defendant company did not retain control over subcontractor's conduct. In absence of evidence as to actual or constructive knowledge of subcontractor's allegedly unsafe work methods, no direct liability against Defendant, and thus court properly entered summary judgment for Defendant. (PALMER and McBRIDE, concurring.)