Local Government Law

House Bill 3636

Topic: 
Mechanics Lien Act
(Burke, D-Evergreen Park; Mulroe, D-Chicago) does three things in response to the LaSalle Bank National Association vs. Cypress Creek opinion. (1) Requires that the owner or interested person’s demand for suit to be commenced or answered within 30 days must contain this language in at least 10-point, boldface type: “Failure to respond to this notice within 30 days after receipt, as required by Section 34 of the Mechanics Lien Act, shall result in the forfeiture of the referenced lien.” (2) Defines a “lien creditor” as someone who does work or furnishes material under this Act. A lien creditor is preferred over other encumbrances except that previous encumbrances are preferred only to the extent of the value of the land at the time the contract was made for the improvements, and each lien creditor is preferred to the value of all later improvements regardless of whether the lien creditor provided those improvements. (3) If the sale proceeds are insufficient to satisfy claims of both prior encumbrances and lien creditors, the sale proceeds are to be distributed as follows. (a) Any previous encumbrance has a paramount lien in the portion of the proceeds attributable to the value of the land at the time of making of the contract for improvements. (b) Any lien creditors have a paramount lien in the portion of the proceeds attributable to all later improvements made to the property. (4) It has an immediate effective date. House Bill 3636 is in the House awaiting concurrence on Senate Amendment No. 2.

Bell v. Chicago Police Chief Keating

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
First Amendment
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 11-2408
Decision Date: 
September 10, 2012
Federal District: 
N.D. Ill., E. Div.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded
Dist. Ct. erred in dismissing on lack of standing grounds, plaintiff's action alleging that Chicago's ordinance (Chicago Municipal Code, section 8-4-010(d)), which prohibits acts of disorderly conduct when individual knowingly fails to obey lawful police order under circumstances where three or more other persons are committing acts of disorderly conduct in immediate vicinity, and where said acts are likely to cause substantial harm or serious inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, violated plaintiff's First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Plaintiff had standing to bring instant constitutional challenge where he had previously been arrested under said ordinance, and where he alleged that potential for future enforcement of ordinance had chilling effect on his willingness to participate in lawful protests and assemblies. Moreover, Ct. found that ordinance was overbroad and void for vagueness with respect to giving police authority to disburse individuals on basis of "serious inconvenience, annoyance or alarm," since ordinance: (1) substantially encumbered political expression vis-a vis ordinance's legitimate scope; and (2) failed to identify what types of conduct would trigger lawful dispersal order and allowed for arbitrary enforcement.

Jackson v. The Board of Election Commissioners of the City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court
Civil Court
Municipalities
Citation
Case Number: 
2012 IL 111928
Decision Date: 
Friday, September 7, 2012
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co.
Holding: 
Appellate court reversed.
Justice: 
KARMEIER
Section 3.1-10-5(b) of Illinois Municipal Code, which provides that a person is not eligible for elective municipal office if he is in arrears in payment of tax or other debt to municipality, did not disqualify city council candidate where homestead exemptions on her property were challenged. Candidate subsequently elected to waive exemptions on all but one parcel and paid additional property tax that would have been due on parcels had exemptions not been claimed. Property tax payable to county treasurer is not "a tax or other indebtedness due a municipality" within meaning of Section 3.1-10-5(b). (KILBRIDE, THOMAS, GARMAN, and THEIS, concurring; FREEMAN and BURKE, concurring in part and dissenting in part.)

Town of Cicero v. Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Injunctions
Citation
Case Number: 
2012 IL App (1st) 112164
Decision Date: 
Friday, August 10, 2012
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co.,6th Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
PALMER
Section 19 of Metropolitan Water Reclamation District Act does not provide cause of action for damages allegedly caused by Reclamation District’s failure to anticipate need to use its systems to prevent flooding. Act does not provide Town with right to be free from backup sewage flooding, and thus no recognized cause of action underlying Town’s request for injunctive relief. (GARCIA and LAMPKIN, concurring.)

Public Act 97-848

Topic: 
Post-judgment collection of debts
(Williams, D-Chicago; Haine, D-Alton) makes three changes to citations and body attachments. (1) It requires a citation to be served by personal service or abode service as provided in Supreme Court Rule 105 attaching a copy of the statutory Income and Asset Form created by this bill. (2) It prohibits a payment order from being issued against a person unless the form was served on the debtor, the debtor has an opportunity to assert exemptions, and the payments are from nonexempt sources. (3) No order of body attachment or other civil order for incarceration may be issued for a respondent on a charge of indirect civil contempt unless the respondent has first had an opportunity to appear in court to answer after personal service or abode service of notice as provided in Section 2-203. It exempts enforcement for a violation of a municipal ordinance. (See the June Illinois Bar Journal article by Adam W. Lasker that discusses this bill in more detail.) Effective July 25, 2012.

Public Act 97-836

Topic: 
False UCC filings
(Zalewski, D-Chicago; Harmon, D-Oak Park) amends the Secured Transactions Article of the Uniform Commercial Code. It prohibits a person from filing or cause to be filed a false record that the person knows or reasonably should know is (1) not authorized or permitted under specified provisions; (2) not related to a valid existing or potential commercial or financial transaction, an existing agricultural or other lien, or a judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction; and (3) filed with the intent to harass or defraud the person identified as debtor in the record or any other person. Creates criminal and civil penalties and administrative relief from the Secretary of State. Exempts records filed by a regulated financial institution or its representative. Effective July 20, 2012.

Public Act 97-827

Topic: 
Open Meetings Act
(Pihos, R-Glen Ellyn; Dillard, R-Westmont) makes two changes to the Open Meetings Act. (1) An agenda must set forth the general subject matter of any resolution or ordinance that will be the subject of final action at a meeting. (2) The public body must ensure that at least one copy of any notice and agenda for the meeting is continuously available for public review during the entire 48-hour period before the meeting. Posting on its website satisfies this requirement, but if a notice or agenda is not continuously available for the full 48-hour period because of events outside of the control of the public body, then that lack of availability does not invalidate any meeting or action taken at a meeting. Effective Jan. 1, 2013.

Public Act 97-812

Topic: 
Property Tax Code
(Tyron, R-Crystal Lake; Althoff, R-Crystal Lake) requires that complaints must be filed on or before 30 calendar days after the date of publication of the assessment list. Under current law those complaints must be filed on or before the 10th day of August in counties with less than 150,000 inhabitants and on or before the 10th day of September in counties with 150,000 or more but less than three million inhabitants). Effective July 13, 2012.

Senate Bill 3202

Topic: 
Community association fees
(Maloney, D-Chicago; Thapedi, D-Chicago) amends the Community Association Manager Licensing and Disciplinary Act. It requires all community associations pay to the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation an annual fee of $50 plus an additional $1 per unit not to exceed an annual fee of $1,000 if they (1) have 10 or more units, (2) retain an individual to provide services as a community association manager for compensation, (3) are not master associations, or (4) are registered in the State as a not-for-profit corporation. Passed both chambers; effective immediately if the Governor signs it.

Public Act 97-720

Topic: 
Municipalities and amateur radio
Public Act 97-720 prohibits a municipality from adopting or enforcing an ordinance or resolution that affects the placement, screening, or height of amateur radio antennas or support structures unless the ordinance or resolution has a reasonable and clearly defined aesthetic, public health, or safety objective and is the minimum practical regulation that is necessary to accomplish these objectives but reasonably accommodates amateur radio communications. Effective June 29, 2012.