Local Government Law

House Bill 3342

Topic: 
FOIA
(Burke, D-Oak Lawn; Hutchinson, D-Chicago Heights) creates an exemption from FOIA disclosure for “personally identifiable information” that is exempted under the Toll Highway Act. The exempted information includes any information that identifies or describes an driver such as bank account information, credit card number, telephone number, and address. Passed both chambers.

House Bill 3343

Topic: 
FOIA
(Biss, D-Skokie; Schoenberg, D-Evanston) exempts from the Act’s disclosure requirements the names, addresses, and personal information of minors who are participants in the programs of park districts, forest preserve districts, conservation districts, recreation agencies, and special recreation associations. Passed both chambers.

House Bill 1670

Topic: 
Open Meetings Act
(Burke, D-Oak Lawn; Crotty, D-Oak Forest) changes the compliance date for the Attorney General’s electronic training of elected or appointed members of a public body. If you are a member on Jan. 1, 2012, you must complete the training by Jan. 1, 2013. If you become a member after Jan. 1, 2012, you must complete the training no later than 90 days after you are sworn into office or assume the duties of office. School board members may comply by participating in training sponsored or conducted by an organization under Section 23 of the School Code. Passed both chambers.

House Bill 1716

Topic: 
FOIA
(Currie, D-Chicago; Harmon, D-Oak Park) creates separate FOIA guidelines for “recurrent requestors” to be answered within a reasonable period of time considering the size and complexity if the request. “Recurrent requestors” means a person that in the 12 months immediately preceding a request has submitted to the same public body any of the following: (1) a minimum of 50 requests for records; (2) a minimum of 15 requests for records within a 30-day period; or a minimum of seven requests within a seven-day period. News media and non-profit, scientific or academic organizations are exempt if the principal purpose of the request is academic, scientific, or public research or education. Within five business days the public body must notify the requestor that (1) the requestor is being treated as a recurrent requestor and why it is being treated as such; and (2) the requestor will get an initial response within 21 days with the four different authorized responses. Within 21 business days the public body must (1) estimate the time and estimated fees required to comply with the request; (2) deny the request citing the authority to do so; (3) notify the requestor that the request is unduly burdensome and give the requestor an opportunity to reduce it to manageable proportions; or (4) provide the records. A public body may charge a commercial request up to $10 for each hour spent by personnel in searching for and retrieving a requested record, except that no fees may be charged or the first eight hours. If the public records are maintained by contract with a third-party storage company in an off-site storage facility, the public body may charge for the actual cost of retrieving and transporting those public records. A requestor for commercial purposes may not appeal to the Public Access Counselor except for the limited purpose of reviewing whether the public body properly determined that the request was made for a commercial purpose. Passed both chambers.

House Bill 2259

Topic: 
Open Meetings Act
(Ramey, R-Carol Stream; Crotty, D-Oak Forest) authorizes a public body to hold a closed meeting to discuss correspondence and records (i) that may not be disclosed under a specific portion of the Public Aid Code or (ii) that pertain to appeals conducted a specific provision of the Public Aid Code. Amends the Freedom of Information Act to exempt those kinds of correspondence and records from the Act's disclosure requirements. Passed both chambers.

HB 1277

Topic: 
Open Meetings Act
(Rita, D-Chicago; Martinez, D-Chicago) authorizes a public body to close a meeting between internal or external auditors and governmental audit committees, finance committees, and their equivalents if the discussion involves internal control weaknesses, identification of potential fraud risk areas, known or suspected frauds, and fraud interviews. Passed both chambers.

National Rifle Association of America, Inc. v. City of Chicago, Ill.

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
Attorney Fees
Citation
Case Number: 
Nos. 10-3957 et al. Cons.
Decision Date: 
June 2, 2011
Federal District: 
N.D. Ill., E. Div.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded
Dist. Ct. erred in finding that plaintiffs in action alleging that defendants' ordinances banning possession of handguns violated Second Amendment were not entitled to attorney fees as prevailing parties in said action since defendants had repealed said ordinances after Supreme Ct. had found in McDonald v. Chicago, 130 SCt 3020, that Second Amendment applied to states' and municipalities' ordinances, but before Dist. Ct. could enter final judgment granting relief to instant plaintiffs. While Dist. Ct. found that plaintiffs were not entitled to attorney fees because it had dismissed as moot instant lawsuit based upon defendants' repeal of their ordinances, instant plaintiffs were prevailing parties under Buckhannon, 532 US 598 for purposes of award of attorney fees since: (1) Supreme Ct. had entered judgment in their favor; and (2) litigants, like defendants, who either surrender their position or settle case after unfavorable judgment are not entitled to vacatur of said judgment.

The Board of Education of Auburn Community Unit School District No. 10 v. The Illinois Department of Revenue

Illinois Supreme Court
Civil Court
Property Tax
Citation
Case Number: 
Nos. 110395, 110422 cons.
Decision Date: 
Thursday, May 19, 2011
District: 
4th Dist.
Division/County: 
Sangamon Co.
Holding: 
Appellate court reversed.
Justice: 
THEIS
The Divernon School District was dissolved and most of it was annexted to Sangamon County's Auburn School District, leaving a small amount of Auburn District land in Montgomery County. Property Tax Extension Limitation Law (PTELL) limits property tax increases by non-home-rule taxing districts. Montgomery County had not considered a PTELL referendum; however, the entire Auburn District remains subject to PTELL. Because PTELL was already applicable to Auburn District at time of annexation, it could only be removed from District pursuant to removal referendum process, but statutory conditions for removal were not met. (KILBRIDE, FREEMAN, THOMAS, GARMAN, KARMEIER, and BURKE, concurring.)

Innovative Modular Solutions v. Hazel Crest School Dist. 152.5

Illinois Supreme Court PLAs
Civil Court
Contracts
Citation
PLA issue Date: 
May 25, 2011
Docket Number: 
No. 112052
District: 
Appeal, 3rd Dist.
This case presents question as to whether trial court properly found that defendant-School District was required to pay plaintiff cancellation fees pursuant to terms contained in leases for portable classrooms, under circumstances where State, in invoking Downstate School Finance Authority for Elementary Districts Law subsequently gave Hazel Crest School District School Finance Authority (Authority) responsibility for defendant’s finances, and where Authority did not direct defendant to pay said fees. Appellate Court, in reversing trial court, found that once State gave Authority exclusive control over defendant’s finances, defendant had no statutory authority to pay its debt because defendant’s performance on said leases was legally impossible. Moreover, Appellate Court found that plaintiff could not obtain judgment against Authority for said fees.