Real Estate Law

Public Act 99-503

Topic: 
Personal Information Protection Act

(Biss, D-Skokie; Williams, D-Chicago) makes the following changes to the Act.

(1) Expands the definition of protected “personal information” to include a person’s first name or first initial and the last name that is encrypted or redacted but the unlocking keys have been breached if one of several “data elements” have also been unlawfully acquired. (2) Expands “data elements” to include medical information, health insurance information, unique biometric data. (3) Expands protected “personal information” to include user name or email address and password or security question information that permits a person’s online accounts to be breached. (4) Requires a data collector that owns or licenses, or maintains or stores but does not own or license, records that contain personal information of Illinois resident to implement and maintain reasonable security measures to protect those records from unauthorized access or use. (5) Compliance with the federal HIPAA complies with this Act as long as the covered entity provides notice of a breach to the Illinois Attorney General within notifying the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Effective January 1, 2017. 

City of Joliet, Ill. v. New West, L.P.

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
Condemnation
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 15-2183
Decision Date: 
June 17, 2016
Federal District: 
N.D. Ill., E. Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed

Dist. Ct. did not err in finding in instant condemnation action that plaintiff-City was entitled to possess and demolish defendant’s housing complex, where record supported Dist. Ct.’s finding that housing complex was dilapidated and crime ridden, and where plaintiff intended to use land to extend existing park. Ct. further rejected defendant’s claim that demolition of housing complex would pose disparate impact on African-Americans living in complex, since, although African Americans formed largest racial group in complex, any impact claim must be based on number of African-Americans living in city. Moreover, defendant failed to show that required move from complex constituted cognizable injury to residents of complex given Dist. Ct.’s finding that housing complex was dilapidated and crime ridden. Fact that judge, rather than jury, generated instant findings of fact in condemnation proceeding did not require different result.

U.S. Bank National Association v. Johnston

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Mortgage Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2016 IL App (2d) 150128
Decision Date: 
Monday, June 13, 2016
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
Kane Co.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
McLAREN

Plaintiff bank filed foreclosure action against 3 defendants, and they moved to dismiss based on prior default judgment entered in favor of another bank.  One defendant also argued that he was a bona fide purchaser for value of property. Court erred by dismissing complaint as barred by res judicata. Name of proper defendant did not appear on the face of the summonses in the other bank's foreclosure action, and thus element of res judicata, that a final judgment on merits has been reached by court of competent jurisdiction, is not met. Defendant named in the other action does not exist, and 2 other named defendants were not properly served; thus, judgments entered are void.(JORGENSEN and BIRKETT, concurring.)

House Bill 5607

Topic: 
Unclaimed U.S. savings bonds

(Lang, D-Skokie; Link, D-Gurnee) amends the Uniform Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act. It presumes that a United States savings bond is presumed abandoned if the bond has remained unclaimed and unredeemed for five years after its date of final extended maturity. Establishes a procedure by which the State Treasurer may obtain a judicial determination that the bond has escheated to the State. Passed both chambers. 

House Bill 6285

Topic: 
Mobile Home and Landlord and Tenant Rights Act.

(Moeller, D-Elgin; Bush, D-Grayslake) requires the park owner to give the tenant written notice specifying the reason for any fine that may be imposed on the tenant if the tenant breaches any provision of the lease or park rules. “Fine” does not include any fees that are imposed on a tenant for services or products provided by the park owner to the tenant.

If a fine is imposed on a tenant, the following applies for 45 days after written notice of the fine is delivered to the tenant: (1) non-payment of a fine is not grounds for refusal to accept a rent payment; and (2) the fine may not be deducted from a rent payment. Acceptance of a rent payment may not be construed as a waiver of an unpaid fine. Passed both chambers. 

Not applicable

Topic: 
Statutory Court Fee Task Force

The Access to Justice Act created the Statutory Court Fee Task Force to study the current system of fees, fines, and other court costs and propose recommendations to the Illinois General Assembly and Illinois Supreme Court. Its report may be found at the URL below. 

Senate Bill 2845

Topic: 
Supplementary proceedings

(Silverstein, D-Chicago; Lang, D-Skokie) makes the following changes to supplementary proceedings: (1) Clarifies that a petition to revive a judgment must served and an order entered for a judgment to be revived. (2) Requires the amount of the bond to be posted after an entry of an order of prejudgment attachment against the property of a debtor who may conceal property or flee the state. (3) Makes taxable as court costs of all charges relating to the electronic filing of cases and pleadings. (4) Under current law, a court must vacate a judgment and dismiss the action when a release or full satisfaction for judgment is filed by the prevailing party. This provides that a judge may do so. (5) Eliminates the sheriff’s levy sale of corporate stock as superseded by the Uninform Commercial Code or a citation to discover assets statute. Passed both chambers. 

 

House Bill 4648

Topic: 
Fiduciary access to digital assets

(Welch, D-Westchester; Connelly, R-Lisle) creates the Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act (2015). This is a big bill for transactional and estate-planning lawyers, and it has an immediate effective date so that it becomes law if and when the Governor signs it. House Bill 4648 provides procedures and requirements for the access and control by guardians, executors, agents, and other fiduciaries of the digital assets of persons who are deceased, under a legal disability, or subject to the terms of a trust. Passed both chambers

Senate Bill 3162

Topic: 
E-business filing fee

(Harmon, D-Oak Park; Cassidy, D-Chicago) requires circuit court clerks to collect a $9 “e-business” fee against all civil litigants. Exempts motions for change of venue and appeals from administrative agencies. After January 1, 2022 the law-library filing fee of $21 is reduced to $20 and the children's waiting room fee of $10 is reduced to $8. After January 1, 2022 the ceiling that the county board may not exceed for a civil filing fee is reduced by $6 for all counties. Passed both chambers.