Real Estate Law

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Bodzianowski

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Mortgage Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2016 IL App (3d) 150632
Decision Date: 
Friday, September 9, 2016
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Will Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
WRIGHT

In 2011, Plaintiff bank filed mortgage foreclosure action in federal court, where court granted borrowers' motion to dismiss with prejudice, on basis that bank lacked standing to foreclose on debt arising out of a a transfer to the Trust deemed as void by a New York state statute. In 2014, Plaintiff bank filed 2nd foreclosure action against the same borrowers in Illinois state court, where court properly dismissed action on grounds of res judicata. (SCHMIDT, concurring; HOLDRIDGE, specially concurring.)

CF SBC Pledgor 1 2012-1 Trust v. Clark/School, LLC

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Mortgage Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2016 IL App (4th) 150568
Decision Date: 
Thursday, September 8, 2016
District: 
4th Dist.
Division/County: 
Vermilion Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
HARRIS

Plaintiff, a Delaware statutory trust, brought mortgage foreclosure action against Defendant, an Illinois LLC, alleging Defendant was in default. Court properly granted Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. Court properly found Defendant was in default under mortgage security agreement for failing to maintain its existence as an LLC. Terms of that agreement plainly stated that mortgage loan was made in reliance on Defendant's continued existence as an LLC. The LLC Act's relation-back provision does not apply to prevent Defendant's dissolution from constituting an "Event of Default" under the agreement. (STEIGMANN and APPLETON, concurring.)

OneWest Bank Fsb v. Cielak

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Mortgage Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2016 IL App (3d) 150224
Decision Date: 
Wednesday, August 31, 2016
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Will Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
McDADE

Court properly entered judgmgent of foreclosure. Mortgage is valid, as note and mortgage documents were signed together, executed contemporaneously, and intended to complement each other. Defendant spouses jointly agreed to grant a lien on their home when they signed the mortgage. Because both spouses are obligated under the lien, real estate is not protected by their ownership of property as tenants by the entirety.(O'BRIEN and WRIGHT, concurring.)

Public Act 99-849

Topic: 
Condominium Property Act

(Mulroe, D-Chicago; Martwick, D-Chicago) allows a board of managers to assign the right of the association to future income from common expenses or other sources and to mortgage or pledge substantially all of the remaining assets of the association by a majority vote of the entire board.

Effective January 1, 2017.

 

 

Public Act 99-852

Topic: 
Mechanics Lien Act

(Althoff, R-McHenry; Nekritz, D-Buffalo Grove) extends the sunset for current law until December 31, 2020. It requires work to be done or materials furnished to obtain a lien within three years for residential property and five years for any other kind of property.

Effective August 19, 2016. 

 

Terra Foundation for American Art v. DLA Piper LLP

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Statute of Repose
Citation
Case Number: 
153285
Decision Date: 
Friday, August 12, 2016
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook County
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
Rochford

Plaintiffs brought action alleging malpractice against Defendant, a law firm, which Plaintiff had retained in connection with the sale of real estate. Plaintiff alleged that Defendant was negligent in several regards, including by failing to include the exclusionary language of the term sheet in the agreements. Court properly dismissed Plainttiff’s complaint, because it was barred as a matter of law by the applicable statute of repose. The period of repose was not tolled by Defendant’s subsequent failures to correct the omission of the exclusionary language in the first amendment. (HOFFMAN and DELORT, concurring.)

Public Act 99-743

Topic: 
Mendelson and trusts

(Silverstein, D-Chicago; Lang, D-Chicago) seeks to reverse the holding of the Mendelson case (2016 IL App (2d) 150084). It provides that the transfer of real property to a trust requires a transfer of legal title to the trustee evidenced by a written instrument of conveyance and acceptance by the trustee. Provides that for any interest in real property to become trust property in a trust of which any transferor is a trustee, the instrument of conveyance shall additionally be recorded in the appropriate real property records.  

Effective January 1, 2017.

Public Act 99-612

Topic: 
Common Interest Community Association Act and the Condominium Property Act

(Cassidy, D-Chicago; Mulroe, D-Chicago) redefines “acceptable technological means” to mean any generally available technology that, by rule of the association, is deemed to provide reasonable security, reliability, identification, and verifiability. Allows acceptable technological means to be used to conduct association business such as a notice required to be sent or received; signature, vote, consent, or approval required to be obtained; and the performance of obligations or exercise of rights. It does not apply to any notices required under the Forcible Entry and Detainer Article or in connection with foreclosure proceedings in enforcement of any lien rights under the Acts.

Effective January 1, 2017.

 

 

Public Act 99-609

Topic: 
Land Trust Beneficiary Rights Act

(Williams, D-Chicago; Hastings, D-Matteson) provides that the rights of a beneficial owner may not be impaired in any way by the change of trustees if the identity of the trustee of a land trust has been changed by virtue of sale, assignment, appointment, or otherwise, but the beneficial owner or owners of the land trust remain unchanged. Provides that a change of trustees by a sale, acquisition, or appointment governed by the Corporate Fiduciaries Act is not a bar or defense to any court action filed by or in the name of either the previous trustee or the new trustee, regardless of whether the court action was originally filed in a representative capacity on behalf of the beneficial owner or owners.

Effective January 1, 2017.