Real Estate Law

AMA Realty Group of Illinois v. Melvin M. Kaplan Realty, Inc.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Real Estate
Citation
Case Number: 
2015 IL App (1st) 143600
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, June 30, 2015
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 2d Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
LIU
Realty group filed suit against realtor alleging slander of title, after realtor recorded a broker's lien against multi-unit apartment building that Plaintiff owned. Court properly entered summary judgment for Defendant realtor in its counterclaim, as Plaintiff breached exclusive listing agreement by negotiating directly with purchaser and subsequently concealing these negotiations. Language of listing agreement indicates that Plaintiff was prohibited from negotiating directly with any prospective purchaser, regardless of whether realtor was responsible for originally introducing or procuring, or had any prior contact with, the prospect.(SIMON and NEVILLE, concurring.)

NorthBrook Bank and Trust Company v. 300 Level, Inc.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Service of Process
Citation
Case Number: 
2015 IL App (1st) 142288
Decision Date: 
Monday, June 15, 2015
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 1st Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
DELORT
In commercial mortgage foreclosure case, court entered order providing that any employee of the named detective agency was authorized to serve process on Defendant. That language tracked language of statute, and thus, that agency process server was authorized, under statute, to serve Defendant, and service was effective. By entering into agreed order, Defendant was barred from challenging service, under equitable estoppel and relinquishment of its possessory interest in property, as stated in agreed order. (CUNNINGHAM and HARRIS, concurring.)

LSREF2 Nova Investments III, LLC v. Coleman

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Mortgage Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2015 IL App (1st) 140184
Decision Date: 
Friday, June 5, 2015
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 6th Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
LAMPKIN
Where court had personal jurisdiction over Defendant to enter personal deficiency judgment against her pursuant to Section 15-1508(e) of Foreclosure Law based on Plaintiff's request for a personal deficiency judgment in its foreclosure complaint, Plaintiff's subsequent claim for the amount of the deficiency as determined in foreclosure suit as a result of sale of property is barred by res judicata, in accordance with transactional test. (HALL and ROCHFORD, concurring.)

Senate Bill 1630

Topic: 
Judicial facilities fee
(Holmes, D-Aurora; Keith Wheeler, R-Oswego) authorizes the Kane County Board, with concurrence of the chief judge of the circuit, to impose a judicial facilities fee not to exceed $30. It will be imposed on civil litigants and defendants in criminal cases. Passed both chambers.

Senate Bill 1344

Topic: 
Common Interest Community Association Act
(Haine, D-Alton; Beiser, D-Alton) provides that no action to incorporate a common interest community as a municipality may commence until an instrument agreeing to incorporation has been signed by 51% (instead of two-thirds) of the members. Passed both chambers.

House Bill 2745

Topic: 
Municipal Code violations
(Andersson, R-Geneva; McConnaughy, R-St. Charles) creates an alternative proceeding to take place after the expiration of the time in which judicial review may be sought after a final determination of a code violation. If a defendant has failed to comply with a judgment to correct a code violation or pay a fine, any expenses incurred by a municipality to enforce the judgment shall be a debt due and owing the municipality by the defendant. Authorizes the municipality to impose a lien on the real estate or personal estate of the defendant in the amount of any debt due to the municipality. Permits a hearing officer to set aside any judgment entered by default and set a new hearing date if the hearing officer determines that the petitioner's failure to appear was for good cause or because the municipality did not provide proper service of process. Passed both chambers.

House Bill 2744

Topic: 
Boundary-line agreements
(Andersson, R-Geneva; McConnaughy, R-St. Charles) amends the Municipal Code to provide that it shall not be considered a “conflict” under the boundary-line provisions of this Section when a municipality that is a party to a jurisdictional boundary-line agreement cedes property within its own jurisdiction to another municipality not a party to the same jurisdictional boundary-line agreement. Passed both chambers.

House Bill 2644

Topic: 
Condominium Property Act
(Cassidy, D-Chicago; Steans, D-Chicago) makes it void as a matter of public policy if a provision in a condominium instrument purports to limit or restrict the representative rights of the board if it requires prior consent of the unit owners or requires arbitration or mediation of a dispute between the developer or one or more declarants under the condominium instruments. Deletes language providing that a provision in a declaration which would otherwise be void and ineffective may be enforced if it is approved by a vote of not less than 75% of the unit owners at any time after the election of the first unit-owner board of managers. Passed both chambers.

House Bill 2635

Topic: 
Mechanics Lien Act
(Sandack, R-Downers Grove; Harmon, D-Oak Park) allows a lien claimant to proceed directly against a bond substituted for the lien on the owner’s real estate or funds. The court may dismiss parties other than the principal, surety of the bond, and the lien claimant. Defenses against the lien claimant are limited to those that could be asserted by the principal or contracting owner. The “prevailing party” in an action brought under this new subsection shall be awarded its attorney fees. The “prevailing party” is defined as a lien claimant that recovers at least 75% of the amount of its lien claim, or the principal of the bond if the lien claimant recovers less than 25% of the amount of its lien claim. The attorney’s fees for a lien claimant that is a prevailing party is limited to the amount remaining on the bond after the payment of the claim and interest, and the attorney’s fees awarded to a bond principal shall be limited to 50% of the amount of the lien claim. Passed both chambers.