Real Estate Law

Marks v. Vanderventer

Illinois Supreme Court
Civil Court
Due Process
Citation
Case Number: 
2015 IL 116226
Decision Date: 
Thursday, May 21, 2015
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
Lake Co.
Holding: 
Circuit court reversed.
Justice: 
BURKE
A rational relationship exists between persons subjected to Rental Housing Support Program surcharge and the object of the section of the Counties Code which imposes a $10 surcharge for recordation of any real estate-related document in a county. Goals of statute are to provide affordable rental housing and to maintain and improve property values, and are legitimate government interests. (GARMAN, FREEMAN, THOMAS, KILBRIDE, KARMEIER, and THEIS, concurring.)

People ex rel. McGuire v. Cornelius

Illinois Supreme Court PLAs
Civil Court
Tax Deeds
Citation
PLA issue Date: 
May 27, 2015
Docket Number: 
No. 118975
District: 
3rd Dist.
This case presents question as to whether trial court properly granted respondent’s motion seeking relief under section 22-45 of Property Tax Code and under section 2-1401 of Code of Civil Procedure to set aside tax deed issued to petitioner, where trial court concluded that petitioner had failed to notify respondent concerning County Clerk’s contact information as required by Tax Code. Although Appellate Court initially found that trial court improperly found that tax deed was void because it lacked personal jurisdiction over respondent, it nevertheless held that trial court did not err in voiding instant tax deed, since: (1) petitioner had failed to strictly comply with notice provisions set forth in section 22-5 and 22-10 of Tax Code; and (2) respondent could use collateral relief provisions of section 2-1401 to obtain vacatur of order awarding instant tax deed. (Dissent filed.)

Christopher B. Burke Engineering Ltd. v. Harkins

Illinois Supreme Court PLAs
Civil Court
Mechanic's Liens
Citation
PLA issue Date: 
May 27, 2015
Docket Number: 
No. 118955
District: 
3rd Dist.

This case presents question as to whether trial court properly granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment in action by plaintiff-engineering firm to enforce its mechanic’s lien for certain engineering work performed for defendants on real estate. Appellate Court, in affirming trial court, noted that subject property remained untouched following completion of plaintiff’s services and found that plaintiff could not enforce its lien under Mechanic’s Lien Act since it had failed to show that its work had improved subject property, where plaintiff’s work merely allowed plaintiffs to record final plat of subject property. (Dissent filed.)

Republic Bank of Chicago v. Village of Manhattan

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2015 IL App (3d) 130379
Decision Date: 
Friday, May 15, 2015
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Will Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
LYTTON
(Court opinion corrected 5/26/15.) Bank filed two separate foreclosure actions against multiple Defendants, to foreclose on roads and outlots contained in two failed subdivisions located in village. Court properly granted Village's motion to dismiss, as roads and common areas had been dedicated to Village. When a mortgagee executes and records mortgage releases on lots shown on plat of subdivision, mortgagee impliedly consents to entire plat, including streets shown thereon, and can no longer revoke its assent to dedication of streets and alleys set forth in plat. Village satisfied two requirements for valid statutory dedication of property. Village had expressly accepted offers to dedicate roads and outlots after Bank filed foreclosure complaints and before judgment for foreclosure was entered, and thus acceptance was timely and effective. As property was unimproved, Village was not required to improve streets and commons areas to prove acceptance. (O'BRIEN, concurring; CARTER, dissenting.)

Baker v. The Forest of Preserve District of Cook County

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2015 IL App (1st) 141457
Decision Date: 
Monday, May 18, 2015
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 1st Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
CONNORS
Forest Preserve District of Cook County has statutory authority, under Cook County Forest Preserve District Act, to acquire property in foreclosure by purchasing mortgage note and subsequently bidding on property at foreclosure sale. Ultimate purpose of Forest Preserve District's purchase of mortgage note was creation of a forest preserve, not acquired for profit but for a public purpose.(DELORT and CUNNINGHAM, concurring.)

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sanders

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Motions to Vacate
Citation
Case Number: 
2015 IL App (1st) 141272
Decision Date: 
Friday, May 22, 2015
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 5th Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
REYES
Court properly dismissed Defendant's Section 2-1401 petition to vacate judgment of foreclosure. Defendant waived jurisdiction when he participated in hearing and failed to contest court's jurisdiction within 60 days required by Section 15-1505.6 of Foreclosure Law. Defendant failed to establish by preponderance of evidence a meritorious defense and that he was duly diligent. (McBRIDE, concurring; GORDON, dissenting.)

In Re Application of the County Treasurer

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Tax Deeds
Citation
Case Number: 
2015 IL App (1st) 133693
Decision Date: 
Wednesday, May 13, 2015
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 3d Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
HYMAN
Court properly granted tax deed to residential property occupied by homeowners. Attempts to notify homeowners of tax sale were sufficient because they were reasonably calculated, under all circumstances, to apprised them of pendency of action and afford them opportunity to present their objections. Sheriff tried to serve them multiple times, and tried to send notice by certified mail, at two addresses, but they failed to claim their mail. No basis to conclude that appellees engaged in fraud in acquiring tax deed or violated homeowners' due process rights.(PUCINSKI and LAVIN, concurring.)

Probate and ‘Underwater’ Real Estate: The Promise of LaPlume

By Fredric Bryan Lesser & Jeffrey P. O’Kelley
June
2015
Article
, Page 24
A groundbreaking appellate case holds that probate courts can sell an estate's "underwater" real property free and clear of all liens, including mortgage liens.

Fattah v. Bim

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Breach of Warranty
Citation
Case Number: 
2015 IL App (1st) 140171
Decision Date: 
Friday, May 1, 2015
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 5th Div.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
PALMER
Patio on Plaintiff's home, which he had bought "as is" for $1.05 million from original purchaser, collapsed 4 months after he moved in to home. Plaintiff sued developers of home, alleging breach of implied warranty of habitability. Defendants failed to meet burden to show Plaintiff knowingly waived implied warranty of habitability. "Successor and assign" provision in waiver agreement between Defendants and original purchaser does not bind Plaintiff, and "as is" rider agreement between Defendants and original purchaser does not bind Plaintiff to original purchaser's waiver of implied warranty of habitability. (McBRIDE and REYES, concurring.)

Chicago Title Insurance Company v. Bass

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Breach of Warranty
Citation
Case Number: 
2015 IL App (1st) 140948
Decision Date: 
Monday, April 27, 2015
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co.,1st Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
HARRIS
Court properly entered summary judgment for defendant tax purchaser on title company's complaint for breach of contract and unjust enrichment. Purchasers of property, through dismissed tax deed litigation, received warranty deed, but then original owner filed Section 2-1401, claiming that Defendant had acquired property by fraud or deception, which court granted. Subsequent purchasers cannot show that defendant offered warranty as inducement to purchase; thus, no action for breach of warranty, and title company stands in shoes of subsequent purchasers.(CUNNINGHAM and CONNORS, concurring.)