Real Estate Law

Hahn v. The County of Kane

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Easements
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL App (2d) 120660
Decision Date: 
Friday, May 31, 2013
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
Kane Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
McLAREN
Court properly found that City and auto dealership company which expanded storm water detention facility proved their affirmative defenses of estoppel. Attorney for trust, which owned land where easement for storm water detention facility was located, knew of intended use for facility yet remained silent as to owner's purported objection to use, and City and company relied on silence to their detriment. (BURKE and BIRKETT, concurring.)

Menard, Inc. v. 1945 Cornell, LLC

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Mortgage Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL App (1st) 121422
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, May 28, 2013
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co.,1st Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
HOFFMAN
Court granted supplemental order of possession against tenants of foreclosured commercial property. Tenant is not required to be named as a party in initial foreclosure action, and properly recorded notice of foreclosure is constructive notice of pendency of foreclosure to persons with interest or lien. Service of supplemental petition on tenant constitutes written demand for possession. (CUNNINGHAM and DELORT, concurring.)

Forcing Lenders to Comply with the Home Affordable Modification Program

By Andrew J. Hawes
June
2013
Article
, Page 308
The seventh circuit rules that borrowers can sue lenders for state law breach of contract and other claims related to a trial period plan payment agreement.

Ripsch v. Goose Lake Association

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Declaratory Actions
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL App (3d) 120319
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, May 14, 2013
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Grundy Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
HOLDRIDGE
A homeowners association has implied or inherent authority to regulate use of common areas, through making and enforcing reasonable rules, even where recorded covenants do not expressly grant the authority to regulate common areas. (McDADE and SCHMIDT, concurring.)

A.J. Smith Federal Savings Bank v. Sabuco

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Mortgage Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL App (3d) 120578
Decision Date: 
Friday, May 10, 2013
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Will Co.
Holding: 
Appeal dismissed.
Justice: 
LYTTON
Defendant, who received loan from Plaintiff bank secured by mortgage on a commercial office building, filed motion for release and satisfaction from deficiency judgment, after mortgage foreclosure proceeding and just prior to wage deduction hearing. Motion was an attack on the judgment underlying the wage deduction proceeding, which could be made at that hearing. As validity of underlying judgment will not be finally decided until hearing, order denying motion for accord and satisfaction is interlocutory and not appealable, and thus appellate court lacks jurisdiction to consider order denying motion. WRIGHT and HOLDRIDGE, concurring.)

House Bill 2269

Topic: 
Real estate documents and thumbprints
Real estate documents and thumbprints. House Bill 2269 (Evans, D-Chicago; Napoleon Harris III) extends the sunset date for requiring a thumbprint of the transferor in a Cook County residential real estate transaction from July 1, 2013 to July 1, 2018. Passed the House and on third reading in the Senate.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Zwolinski

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Appeals
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL App (1st) 120612
Decision Date: 
Monday, May 6, 2013
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co.,1st Div.
Holding: 
Appeal dismissed.
Justice: 
CUNNINGHAM
Defendant in mortgage foreclosure action who later filed notice of appeal failed to serve any of the parties with the notice of appeal as required by Rule 303(c). Other parties were significantly prejudiced by appellant's failure to serve notice of appeal upon them, as they were unable to file briefs on appeal or argue orally and thus were unable to protect their interests through participation in appeal. (ROCHFORD and DELORT, concurring.)

House Bill 2832

Topic: 
Fraudulent real estate transactions
(Lang, D-Chicago) allows a recorder of deeds to establish and use a “Fraud Referral and Review Process” for deeds and instruments that the recorder reasonably believes are fraudulent, unlawfully altered, or intended to unlawfully cloud or transfer the title of any real property. It creates a list of 19 criteria for the recorder to consider in determining whether the document is fraudulent. If the recorder reasonably believes the document may be fraudulent after this review, the recorder must refer the instrument to an administrative law judge for review. The recorder must place a Notice of Referral in the Property Index identifying this document, document number, and the date of the referral. The recorder must also notify the last owner of record. The ALJ must schedule a hearing within 10 business days from receipt of the referral. If the ALJ believes by a preponderance of the evidence that the document is fraudulent, the ALJ must issue a judgment to that effect. The recorder must record that judgment with the notation stating that the fraudulent document may not affect the chain of title of the property in any way. Passed the House and in the Senate.

Mortgage Fraud and E&O Insurance: Making Sure There’s Something to Sue For

By Kurt B. Drain
May
2013
Article
, Page 250
Too often, lenders win mortgage-fraud judgments against defendants who turn out to be judgment proof. The solution? Ensure that mortgage brokers have adequate E&O coverage.

House Bill 2646

Topic: 
Condominium Property Act
(McAsey) does three things to resolve the Act's ambiguity that allows condominium associations to recoup income lost during the lengthy foreclosure of a condominium unit. (1) Clarifies that this Act applies to a purchase at judicial foreclosure sale (other than by a mortgagee) and a purchase from a mortgagee that acquired title through a judicial foreclosure, a consent foreclosure, a common-law strict foreclosure, or the delivery of a deed in lieu of foreclosure. (2) Clarifies and caps the total amount the purchaser may be liable for—no more than the unit's unpaid regular monthly assessments for the nine-month period immediately preceding the judicial foreclosure. This cap includes attorney’s fees and costs incurred by the association during this nine-month period because of the nonpayment of these assessments. (3) Requires that the amount of this unpaid obligation must be included in certain notices in the Mortgage Foreclosure Article and the Condominium Property Act. On second reading in the House.