Real Estate Law

Public Act 96-901

Topic: 
Mortgage Foreclosure Act
(Walker, D-Arlington Heights; Kotowski, D-Park Ridge) gives a mortgagor-defendant the right to request a 90-day stay in foreclosure proceedings if it is determined that he or she was deployed to a combat or combat support posting with the United States armed forces. The court is required to grant this stay. This is in addition to any other rights the veteran may use. Effective Jan. 1, 2011.

Tindle v. Pulte Home Corp.

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
Negligence
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 09-2888
Decision Date: 
June 9, 2010
Federal District: 
N.D. Ill., E. Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed
Dist. Ct. did not err in granting defendant-home builder's motion for summary judgment in action by plaintiff (purchaser of defendant's home) seeking recovery for injuries sustained when plaintiff fell into concealed hole in backyard of new home. Vendor of real property is ordinarily not liable for personal injuries sustained subsequent to transfer of property, and plaintiff did not satisfy requirement for exception to general rule under section 353 where plaintiff had reason to know of dangerous condition of backyard due to presence of sink holes in other parts of plaintiff's property, and where plaintiff failed to show that defendant knew or had reason to know of dangerous condition at time of sale of home.

House Bill 3690

Topic: 
Forcible Entry and Detainer Article
(Zalewski, D-Chicago; Harmon, D-Oak Park) makes a change to Cook County eviction actions at the request of Sheriff Tom Dart. It requires that the complaint contain the following information (to the extent the plaintiff knows): (1) The name of each known occupant for the premises, along with each known occupant's date of birth. (2) If the actual date of birth is unknown, whether a known occupant is known to be under the age of 18 or more than 65 years old. (3) Whether a known occupant has a disability but only to the extent that he occupant has self-reported the disability to the plaintiff. But the failure to provide this information does not affect the validity or the legal effect of any complaint or of any order or judgment entered in the action. Exempts public-housing programs. It is on third reading in the Senate.

Berggren v. Hill

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Real Estate Contract
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 1-09-2567
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 2nd Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
THEIS
Plaintiff sued for specific performance of real estate contract with Defendants for sale of Plaintiff's condominium, and sought order directing Defendants to pay full purchase price, and actual damages. Court dismissed claims, and Plaintiff filed notice of appeal, but then sold the subject property. Plaintiff thereby abandoned her claim for specific performance, and liquidated damages provision in contract precluded award for actual damages. Parties modified preprinted language of contract through letter agreement and in agreeing to reduce amount of earnest money, thus indicating their intent that earnest money would be liquidated damages in event of Defendants' breach.

Rhone v. First American Title Insurance Company

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Property Taxes
Liens
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 1-09-1216
Decision Date: 
Monday, May 17, 2010
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 1st Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
GARCIA
Plaintiffs sued title insurance company for declaration that title policy for townhome they bought in 2006 covered unassessed property taxes for 2004 and 2005. Unassessed property taxes did not constitute liens or encumbrances until bills for those unassessed taxes were issued in 2008, which was after the effective date of the title insurance policy, and were thus not covered by title policy. Plaintiffs had knowledge that townhome had been wrongly assessed as vacant land from 2004 to 2006, and could have altered proration agreement to include sellers' liability for additional taxes upon reassessment.

Senate Bill 3747

Topic: 
Transfer Fee Covenant Act
(Wilhelmi, D-Joliet; Fritchey, D-Chicago) creates the Transfer Fee Covenant Act that declares that transfer fee covenants violate the public policy of favoring the transferability of real property free of unreasonable restraints. A transfer fee is something every future buyer pays to the developer for the developer's initial efforts. The Realtors promoted this bill to ensure that this fee didn't start appearing in Illinois real estate transactions as it has elsewhere. Makes it void for a transfer fee covenant or a lien to secure the payment of a transfer fee that is recorded after the effective date and does not run with the title to the real property. Provides that it cannot be presumed that the provisions of this Act mean that a transfer fee covenant or lien recorded before the effective date is valid and enforceable. Passed both chambers.

Senate Bill 3180

Topic: 
Common Interest Community Association Act
(Wilhelmi, D-Joliet; Schmitz, R-Batavia) creates a comprehensive statute governing real estate other than a condominium or cooperative in which the owners are obliged to pay for common areas that is administrated by an association. It also creates the Service Member Residential Property Act to govern termination of leases and other related issues if the lessee goes on active duty military service for not less than 180 days. Passed both chambers.

American Land Holdings of Indiana, LLC v. Jobe

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
Property
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 09-3151 & 09-3265 Cons.
Decision Date: 
May 6, 2010
Federal District: 
S.D. Ind., Terre Haute Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed
Dist. Ct. did not err in finding for defendants-landowners in action seeking declaration that plaintiff has right to use strip-mine coal process on defendants' land pursuant to 1903 deed granting plaintiff all coal and mineral rights underlying defendants' land, but restricting plaintiff's ability to extract coal in certain areas of said land. Dist. Ct. could properly find that language in deed was ambiguous with respect to plaintiff's right to use strip-mine coal process and could properly receive extrinsic evidence to conclude that plaintiff's right to extract coal was limited to underground mining process. Ct. also found that rule against perpetuities applied to bar instant right to use strip-mine coal process since plaintiff sought to invoke said right more than 21 years after said right had vested in 1903.

The Terraces of Sunset Park v. Chamberlin

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Real Estate Contract
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 2-09-0269
Decision Date: 
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
Lake Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
McLAREN
Parties entered written agreement for purchase of property for $1.75 million, with $50,000 to be paid when agreement signed, and $50,000 on certain date as down payment, but if down payment not made, then initial payment forfeited and transaction void; and if property not closed on certain date, payments forfeited and transaction void. Even though agreement used term "sale contract" and not "option", implications of agreement's terms were clearly those of option, not of sale. Option contract is not subject to Residential Real Property Disclosure Act.