Workers’ Compensation Law

House Bill 1698

Topic: 
Workers' Compensation Act
(Raoul, D-Chicago; Bradley, D-Marion) rewrites the Workers’ Compensation Act. Many of the following changes will take effect on Sept. 1, 2011. (1) Requires the employee prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the accidental injuries were sustained arising out of an in the course of the employment. (2) Allows two construction unions to do a pilot program in which workers’ compensation is collectively bargained. (3) A § 8(d(1) wage differential award is effective only until the employee reaches 67 years of age or five years from the date of the award becomes final, whichever is later. (4) Limits hand injuries to 190 weeks. A recovery for carpal-tunnel may not exceed 15% loss of use of a hand unless cause is shown otherwise by clear and convincing evidence in which the award may not exceed 30% loss of use of the hand. (5) Authorizes a Preferred Provider Network of physicians and qualifies the petitioner’s right to have two separate choices of medical providers. If an injured worker refuses to be treated by the employer-directed PPO network, that refusal counts as his or her first choice of physician. (6) Requires a physician to use the AMA’s Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment in determining the level of impairment. Creates criteria for the physician in that evaluation. Requires the Commission to base its determination of the PPD on the following criteria: (a) the reported level of impairment by the physician; (b) the employee’s occupation; (c) the employee’s age at the time of injury; (d) the employee’s future earning capacity; and (e) evidence of disability corroborated by the treating medical records. No single criterion may be the sole determinant of disability. (7) Reduces out-of-state medical services to that state’s fee schedule, or if that state doesn’t have a fee schedule, the lesser of the actual charge or the amount of the Illinois fee schedule where the employee resides. (8) Creates four geo-zip regions for the Illinois fee schedule effective Jan. 1, 2012. (9) Reduces charges for implants to 25% above the net manufacture’s invoice price and shipping costs minus any rebates. (10) Reduces the fee schedule by 30% for any medical services rendered after Sept. 1, 2011. (11) Utilization-review evaluations will now include nationally recognized treatment guidelines and evidence-based medicine. (12) An employee may not be compensated if the employee’s intoxication is the proximate cause of his or her injuries or if the employee was so intoxicated that it consisted of a departure from the employment. (13) Terminates all arbitrators effective July 1, 2011, but they continue to serve until reappointed or their successors are appointed. All future arbitrators must be licensed Illinois attorneys. Each hearing site will include at least three different arbitrators, and the cases will be assigned on a random basis. Every two years the case will be assigned to a different arbitrator. (14) Prohibits attorneys from giving gifts to someone for referring a case to them unless it is food and drink less $75 per day. (15) Adds extensive reporting requirements for insurance carriers.

Elgin Board of Education School District U-46 v. Illinois Worker's Compensation Comm'n

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Workers' Compensation
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 1-09-3446WC
Decision Date: 
Monday, April 25, 2011
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., WC Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed in part and remanded in part.
Justice: 
HUDSON
IWCC awarded workers compensation benefits to teacher who struck her knee against a metal desk as she arose from her seat to assist a student, causing the surgical incisions on her knee to open and resulting in hemarthrosis. Commission's conclusion that hemarthosis was causally related to accident was not against weight of evidence, as treating physician, though he identified several potential causes (including prior knee surgery), identified work accident as "eliciting cause" of the hemarthrosis. Claimant need only prove that work accident was a causative factor in her condition of ill-being. Commission did not err in dividing claimant's annual salary by 40 to calculate her average-weekly wage. (McCULLOUGH and HOFFMAN, concurring; HOLDRIDGE and STEWART, concurring in part and dissenting in part.)

Absolute Cleaning/SVMBL v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Workers' Compensation
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 4-10-0313WC
Decision Date: 
Thursday, April 28, 2011
District: 
4th Dist.
Division/County: 
Sangamon Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed and remanded.
Justice: 
HOFFMAN
Circuit court affirmed decision of IWCC awarding workers compensation benefits, finding that cleaning service employee sustained work-related neck and back injuries in May 2006 (when lifting a mop bucket) and November 2006 (when lifting a trash bag). Treating physician (a chiropractor) validly referred claimant to other physicians, and thus claimant did not violate the "two-physician rule" by being treated by these other physicians. Commission's finding that claimant's condition of ill-being was causally related to her work was not against manifest weight of evidence, as two physicians (including IME physician) concluded that work accidents caused or exacerbated her condition. Commission properly awarded TTD benefits after date of her layoff in finding that employee's termination was not due to economic conditions; claimant, at time of layoff, had not been working at any of the mines which cancelled their contracts with employer. (McCULLOUGH, HOLDRIDGE, HUDSON, and STEWART, concurring.)

Baldwin v. The Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Workers' Compensation
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 4-10-0375WC
Decision Date: 
Thursday, April 28, 2011
District: 
4th Dist.
Division/County: 
Vermilion Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
HOFFMAN
Security guard was assigned to inside guard duty, which consisted of walking throughout and around a building, and was injured in two falls: once when she fell while descending a metal staircase, and she could not say what caused her foot to slip; and another when her leg began cramping and gave out, causing her to fall. Claimant substantially complied with Section 19(f)(1) of Workers Compensation Act in filing a single request for summons instead of two separate requests. As Claimant did not present any evidence as to cause of her falls, or that she was exposed to a risk greater than that faced by the general public, or that falls were other than purely idiopathic, she failed to prove that her injuries arose out of her employment. (McCULLOUGH, HOLDRIDGE, HUDSON, and STEWART, concurring.)

Johnson v. Tikuye

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Workers Compensation
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 1-10-0114
Decision Date: 
Monday, April 18, 2011
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 1st Div.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
LAMPKIN
State's CMS intervened in a negligence suit filed by license examiner for Secretary of State (who was injured when student backed up over a curb and hit a light pole) against third-party tortfeasors (student and driving school). CMS filed motion to enforce its workers compensation lien against the arbitration award for Plaintiff, per Section 5(b) of Workers Compensation Act. Court improperly reduced CMS's workers compensation lien arbitrarily. Court's conducting of evidentiary hearing to determine whether portion of arbitration award was not related to injury was not provided for by statute. CMS is entitled to lien recovery on entire arbitration award less 25% for attorney fees and a pro rata share of reasonable costs and expenses. (HALL and HOFFMAN, concurring.)

The City of Chicago v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Workers' Compensation
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 1-09-2320WC
Decision Date: 
Monday, April 11, 2011
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., WC Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and reversed in part; remanded.
Justice: 
HOLDRIDGE
Claimant is not entitled to an award under both Sections 8(d)(1) and 8(d)(2) of Workers Compensation Act for the same condition of ill-being. Where a claimant has sustained two separate and distinct injuries to the same body part and the claims are consolidated for hearing and decision, unless evidence presented at the consolidated hearing permits delineation and apportionment of nature and extent of permanency attributable to each accident, Commission may consider all the evidence presented to determine the nature and extent of the claimant’s permanent disability as of the date of hearing. Given the employer’s failure to give explanation justifying the delay in payment of the wage differential benefit, Commission’s award of penalties and attorney fees was not against manifest weight of the evidence. (McCULLOUGH, HOFFMAN, and HUDSON, concurring; STEWART, concurring in part and dissenting in part.)

Baumgardner v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Workers' Compensation
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 1-10-0727WC
Decision Date: 
Monday, April 11, 2011
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., WC Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
HOFFMAN
Claimant, an employee of Cook County, filed claims for injuries to right knee occurring in three separate incidents. Commission did not err in finding that Claimant's condition of ill-being resulting from that accident had to be evaluated as of time of arbitration hearing. Workers Compensation Act clearly contemplates a single determination as to permanency of a claimant’s condition as a result of an employment accident. As Claimant suffered multiple injuries to the same body part as a result of successive accidents and those claims were tried together, Commission properly evaluated the totality of the evidence as related to Claimant’s overall condition of ill-being at the time of hearing and entered a single award encompassing full extent of disability. (McCULLOUGH, HUDSON, and HOLDRIDGE, concurring; STEWART, specially concurring.)

Mulligan v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Workers' Compensation
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 1-09-2507WC
Decision Date: 
Monday, March 28, 2011
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., WC Div.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
STEWART
Claimant, who was vice-president of sales and marketing, suffered two work-related accidents. Commission erred in allowing IME physician's evidence deposition and report over Claimant's Section 12 objection to untimely disclosure. When Section 12 objection is made, the proponent of medical testimony has burden to prove compliance with Section 12, including showing of good cause for failure to meet time deadlines for disclosure and for taking of evidence deposition. (McCULLOUGH, HUDSON, and HOFFMAN, concurring; HOLDRIDGE, specially concurring.)

Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Workers' Compensation
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 1-09-2546WC
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., WC Div.
Holding: 
Reversed
Justice: 
HOFFMAN
(Court opinion corrected 3/11/11.) Accounting clerk employee fractured both wrists when she stumbled and fell on a six-inch dip in an inclined commercial driveway while walking to bank to deposit checks in employer's account. Claimant established that her job duties exposed her to a risk greater than that faced by the general public, as dip in driveway was a street hazard and a job risk to claimant, who was required to use the public way to make bank deposits two or three times per week. Thus, injuries sustained arose out of and in course of her employment, entitling her to worker's compensation benefits. (McCULLOUGH, HUDSON, and STEWART, concurring; HOLDRIDGE, specially concurring.)

Sanchez v. Rental Service Corp.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Workers' Compensation
Citation
Case Number: 
Nos. 1-08-3304, 1-09-0165, 1-08-3304, 1-
Decision Date: 
Thursday, March 10, 2011
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 4th Div.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
PUCINSKI
Court improperly restricted employer's recovery on a workers' compensation lien against proceeds of settlement obtained by its former employee. Order limited employer's recovery to amount paid by Illinois Insurance Guaranty Fund, but barred recovery of amount paid by its workers' compensation carrier before carrier went into liquidation. Entire lien should have been enforced; whether employee was paid workers' compensation benefits by Fund or insurance carrier, employer has statutory right to reimbursement as provided in Section 5(b) of Workers' Compensation Act. (GALLAGHER and LAVIN, concurring.)