Workers’ Compensation Law

McDonald v. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroald Corporation

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Railroad Negligence
Citation
Case Number: 
2011 IL App (1st) 102766
Decision Date: 
Wednesday, August 24, 2011
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 3d Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
MURPHY
Jury verdict for $1.66 million, reduced to $700,143 for decedent's contributory negligence, for injury to train passenger who hurried across pedestrian crosswalk and was blown back into oncoming train, whose horn had sounded while passenger was halfway across crosswalk. Defendant railroad had duty to warn decedent of the approaching train. Jury's finding that decedent walked in front of train when he knew it was unsafe to do so is consistent with its finding that accident was partially attributable to his own negligence, and is not inconsistent with its verdict or it findings that Defendant failed to adequately warn of approaching train. (QUINN and NEVILLE, concurring.)

Johnson v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Workers' Compensation
Citation
Case Number: 
2011 IL App (2d) 100418WC
Decision Date: 
Monday, August 15, 2011
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
Du Page Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed; remanded.
Justice: 
HOFFMAN
Deputy sheriff left his assigned patrol zone to get his personal mail from a post office across county line, and while leaving post office he received a dispatch to assist another deputy sheriff. While en route there, he was in a car accident and was injured. As he driving a county sheriff's patrol car, and responding to an assignment from his dispatcher to assist another deputy sheriff, the only reasonable conclusion to be drawn from facts is that at time of injury he was acting within sphere of his employment, in obeying instructions of his employer to assist another deputy, and that his injuries arose out of and in course of his employment. (HOLDRIDGE and STEWART, concurring; McCULLOUGH and HUDSON, dissenting.)

The 2011 Rewrite of the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Act

By Richard D. Hannigan
August
2011
Article
, Page 400
Make no mistake, this is not the workers' comp act you knew two months ago. This article highlights key changes.

Country Insurance and Financial Services v. Roberts

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Workers' Compensation
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 1-10-3402
Decision Date: 
Thursday, June 30, 2011
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 2d Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
KARNEZIS
Industrial Commission, rather than circuit court, has jurisdiction to hear workers' compensation carrier's claim for fraud against employee who suffered work-related injury. Insurer discovered that employee had begun employment with plumbing company during time that insurer was paying him TTD benefits. Complaint does not present questions of law but of fact, and Commission can draw on its special expertise to answer questions of fact presented by fraud theories. (CONNORS and HARRIS, concurring.)

House Bill 1698

Topic: 
Workers' Compensation Act
(Raoul, D-Chicago; Bradley, D-Marion) rewrites the Workers’ Compensation Act. Many of the following changes will take effect on Sept. 1, 2011. (1) Requires the employee prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the accidental injuries were sustained arising out of an in the course of the employment. (2) Allows two construction unions to do a pilot program in which workers’ compensation is collectively bargained. (3) A § 8(d(1) wage differential award is effective only until the employee reaches 67 years of age or five years from the date of the award becomes final, whichever is later. (4) Limits hand injuries to 190 weeks. A recovery for carpal-tunnel may not exceed 15% loss of use of a hand unless cause is shown otherwise by clear and convincing evidence in which the award may not exceed 30% loss of use of the hand. (5) Authorizes a Preferred Provider Network of physicians and qualifies the petitioner’s right to have two separate choices of medical providers. If an injured worker refuses to be treated by the employer-directed PPO network, that refusal counts as his or her first choice of physician. (6) Requires a physician to use the AMA’s Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment in determining the level of impairment. Creates criteria for the physician in that evaluation. Requires the Commission to base its determination of the PPD on the following criteria: (a) the reported level of impairment by the physician; (b) the employee’s occupation; (c) the employee’s age at the time of injury; (d) the employee’s future earning capacity; and (e) evidence of disability corroborated by the treating medical records. No single criterion may be the sole determinant of disability. (7) Reduces out-of-state medical services to that state’s fee schedule, or if that state doesn’t have a fee schedule, the lesser of the actual charge or the amount of the Illinois fee schedule where the employee resides. (8) Creates four geo-zip regions for the Illinois fee schedule effective Jan. 1, 2012. (9) Reduces charges for implants to 25% above the net manufacture’s invoice price and shipping costs minus any rebates. (10) Reduces the fee schedule by 30% for any medical services rendered after Sept. 1, 2011. (11) Utilization-review evaluations will now include nationally recognized treatment guidelines and evidence-based medicine. (12) An employee may not be compensated if the employee’s intoxication is the proximate cause of his or her injuries or if the employee was so intoxicated that it consisted of a departure from the employment. (13) Terminates all arbitrators effective July 1, 2011, but they continue to serve until reappointed or their successors are appointed. All future arbitrators must be licensed Illinois attorneys. Each hearing site will include at least three different arbitrators, and the cases will be assigned on a random basis. Every two years the case will be assigned to a different arbitrator. (14) Prohibits attorneys from giving gifts to someone for referring a case to them unless it is food and drink less $75 per day. (15) Adds extensive reporting requirements for insurance carriers.

Elgin Board of Education School District U-46 v. Illinois Worker's Compensation Comm'n

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Workers' Compensation
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 1-09-3446WC
Decision Date: 
Monday, April 25, 2011
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., WC Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed in part and remanded in part.
Justice: 
HUDSON
IWCC awarded workers compensation benefits to teacher who struck her knee against a metal desk as she arose from her seat to assist a student, causing the surgical incisions on her knee to open and resulting in hemarthrosis. Commission's conclusion that hemarthosis was causally related to accident was not against weight of evidence, as treating physician, though he identified several potential causes (including prior knee surgery), identified work accident as "eliciting cause" of the hemarthrosis. Claimant need only prove that work accident was a causative factor in her condition of ill-being. Commission did not err in dividing claimant's annual salary by 40 to calculate her average-weekly wage. (McCULLOUGH and HOFFMAN, concurring; HOLDRIDGE and STEWART, concurring in part and dissenting in part.)

Absolute Cleaning/SVMBL v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Workers' Compensation
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 4-10-0313WC
Decision Date: 
Thursday, April 28, 2011
District: 
4th Dist.
Division/County: 
Sangamon Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed and remanded.
Justice: 
HOFFMAN
Circuit court affirmed decision of IWCC awarding workers compensation benefits, finding that cleaning service employee sustained work-related neck and back injuries in May 2006 (when lifting a mop bucket) and November 2006 (when lifting a trash bag). Treating physician (a chiropractor) validly referred claimant to other physicians, and thus claimant did not violate the "two-physician rule" by being treated by these other physicians. Commission's finding that claimant's condition of ill-being was causally related to her work was not against manifest weight of evidence, as two physicians (including IME physician) concluded that work accidents caused or exacerbated her condition. Commission properly awarded TTD benefits after date of her layoff in finding that employee's termination was not due to economic conditions; claimant, at time of layoff, had not been working at any of the mines which cancelled their contracts with employer. (McCULLOUGH, HOLDRIDGE, HUDSON, and STEWART, concurring.)

Baldwin v. The Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Workers' Compensation
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 4-10-0375WC
Decision Date: 
Thursday, April 28, 2011
District: 
4th Dist.
Division/County: 
Vermilion Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
HOFFMAN
Security guard was assigned to inside guard duty, which consisted of walking throughout and around a building, and was injured in two falls: once when she fell while descending a metal staircase, and she could not say what caused her foot to slip; and another when her leg began cramping and gave out, causing her to fall. Claimant substantially complied with Section 19(f)(1) of Workers Compensation Act in filing a single request for summons instead of two separate requests. As Claimant did not present any evidence as to cause of her falls, or that she was exposed to a risk greater than that faced by the general public, or that falls were other than purely idiopathic, she failed to prove that her injuries arose out of her employment. (McCULLOUGH, HOLDRIDGE, HUDSON, and STEWART, concurring.)

Johnson v. Tikuye

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Workers Compensation
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 1-10-0114
Decision Date: 
Monday, April 18, 2011
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 1st Div.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
LAMPKIN
State's CMS intervened in a negligence suit filed by license examiner for Secretary of State (who was injured when student backed up over a curb and hit a light pole) against third-party tortfeasors (student and driving school). CMS filed motion to enforce its workers compensation lien against the arbitration award for Plaintiff, per Section 5(b) of Workers Compensation Act. Court improperly reduced CMS's workers compensation lien arbitrarily. Court's conducting of evidentiary hearing to determine whether portion of arbitration award was not related to injury was not provided for by statute. CMS is entitled to lien recovery on entire arbitration award less 25% for attorney fees and a pro rata share of reasonable costs and expenses. (HALL and HOFFMAN, concurring.)

The City of Chicago v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Workers' Compensation
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 1-09-2320WC
Decision Date: 
Monday, April 11, 2011
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., WC Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and reversed in part; remanded.
Justice: 
HOLDRIDGE
Claimant is not entitled to an award under both Sections 8(d)(1) and 8(d)(2) of Workers Compensation Act for the same condition of ill-being. Where a claimant has sustained two separate and distinct injuries to the same body part and the claims are consolidated for hearing and decision, unless evidence presented at the consolidated hearing permits delineation and apportionment of nature and extent of permanency attributable to each accident, Commission may consider all the evidence presented to determine the nature and extent of the claimant’s permanent disability as of the date of hearing. Given the employer’s failure to give explanation justifying the delay in payment of the wage differential benefit, Commission’s award of penalties and attorney fees was not against manifest weight of the evidence. (McCULLOUGH, HOFFMAN, and HUDSON, concurring; STEWART, concurring in part and dissenting in part.)