The Illinois Supreme Court issued one opinion on Thursday, February 3.
Supreme Court Quick Takes
-
February 4, 2022 | Practice News
1 comment (Most recent February 7, 2022) -
January 24, 2022 | Practice News

Our panel of leading appellate attorneys reviews the eight Illinois Supreme Court opinions handed down Friday, January 21.
-
December 17, 2021 | Practice News

Our panel of leading appellate attorneys reviews the eight Illinois Supreme Court opinions handed down Thursday, December 16.
-
December 3, 2021 | Practice News

The Illinois Supreme Court issued one opinion on Thursday, December 2.
-
November 21, 2021 | Practice News

Our panel of leading appellate attorneys reviews the 10 Illinois Supreme Court opinions handed down Thursday, November 18.
-
October 25, 2021 | Practice News

Our panel of leading appellate attorneys reviews the seven Illinois Supreme Court opinions handed down Thursday, October 21.
-
October 8, 2021 | Practice News

Our panel of leading appellate attorneys reviews the two Illinois Supreme Court opinions handed down Thursday, October 7.
-
September 26, 2021 | Practice News

Our panel of leading appellate attorneys reviews the four Illinois Supreme Court opinions handed down Thursday, September 23.
-
August 27, 2021 | Practice News

A member of our panel of leading appellate attorneys reviews the Illinois Supreme Court opinion handed down Thursday, August 26.
-
August 2, 2021 | Practice News

Our panel of leading appellate attorneys reviews the three Illinois Supreme Court opinions handed down Thursday, July 29. In Beaman v. Freesmeyer, the Court found that the plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact on the commence-and-continue element of his malicious prosecution claim. In Indeck Energy Services v. DePodesta, the Illinois Supreme Court defined what constitutes an injury in the context of claims for usurpation of a corporate opportunity, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of contract. In People v. Dorsey, the Court rejected the defendant’s claim that his sentence violates the proportionate penalties clause of the Illinois Constitution, finding that the claim was forfeited and barred by the doctrine of res judicata.