To assist judicial candidates, the Task Force on Judicial Elections has compiled a selection of helpful resources on judicial campaign conduct in Illinois. It is important to note that judges who run for retention must comply with the Illinois Code of Judicial Conduct and lawyers who run for judicial election must also comply with Rule 8.2 of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct, which reads as follows in pertinent part:
"(a) A lawyer shall not make any statement the lawyer knows to be false or with reckless disregard to its truth or falsity concerning qualifications or integrity of a judge, adjudicative officer, public legal officer, or of a candidate for election or appointment to judicial or legal office;
(b) A lawyer who is a candidate for judicial office shall refrain from conduct which, if the lawyer were a judge, would be a breach of the Code of Judicial Conduct."
Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 8.2
Buckley v Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board, 997 F2d 224 (7th Cir 1993) declaring as an unconstitutional infringement on First Amendment free speech portions of Illinois Supreme Court rule 67 that prohibited judicial candidates from making pledges or promises of conduct in office and from announcing views on disputed legal or political issues.
In re Lane, 127 Ill2d 90, 535 NE2d 866, 129 Ill Dec 101 (1989) attorney suspended for one year from the practice of law for making a loan to a judge, rather than making a loan or gift to the judge's campaign fund).
Illinois Court Commission Cases
In re Tully, 2 Ill Cts Com 150 (1991) (No. 90CC2) (respondent reprimanded for violating Code of Judicial Conduct; statements determined to be in violation since misleading to the voting public included the following; statement that candidate was highly qualified and endorsed by trial lawyers group without sufficiently identifying the organization that found the candidate to be highly qualified; and statement " Vote for John P. Tully Appellate Court Judge" when candidate was a circuit judge running for election to appellate court, not an appellate court judge running for retention)
In re Elwarrd, 1 Ill Cts Com 114 (1997) (No. 77CC1) (Complaint dismissed; commission determined that in the total mix of information conveyed to voters, including numerous bar association and newspaper editorial recommendations that judge not be retained, and considering the need for a judge seeking retention to mount a campaign, it was not misleading for judge running for retention to have excerpted positive quotes from a bar association evaluation without mentioning that the bar association had recommended the judge not be retained because of a clear lack of judicial temperament).
Advisory Opinions of the Illinois Judicial Ethics Committee (IJEC)
Selected Advisory Opinions of the Illinois Judicial Ethics Committee relevant to judicial conduct/elections, courtesy of the Illinois Judges Association Web site – not binding in Illinois but containing practical advice to judges with hypothetical questions on ethical conduct, on a wide variety of subjects, including campaign finance and campaign statements. You'll find more ethics opinions on the Illinois Judges Association Web site.
Opinion No. 93-11 (11/17/93): Judge's duty to disqualify self in proceedings involving political campaign contributors.
Opinion 93-12 (11/17/93): Attendance at a Golf Outing as a Guest of a Bar Association or a lawyer or at the behest of a political office-holder.
Opinion No. 94-05 (3/22/94): Whether a judge or a judge who is a candidate for a higher judicial office can publish his or her views regarding gun control.
Opinion No. 94-06 (3/22/94): Non-candidate judge contributing to candidate.
Opinion No. 94-07 (3/22/94): Judge's nomination for an award to be conferred by a voluntary association.
Opinion No. 94-11 (5/16/94): Judge's authority to publicly endorse a candidate for judicial office.
Opinion No. 94-17 (6/17/94): Judicial Speakers Bureau; Judges' Speech Regarding Controversial Law-Related Subjects.
Opinion No. 94-21 (9/27/94): Judge's attendance and introduction at a political gathering.
Opinion No. 95-08 (4/18/95): Judge sending "thank-you" notes to campaign contributors.
Opinion No. 96-01 (1/31/96): Campaign funds - authority to sign expenditure check
Opinion No. 96-12 (7/16/96): Judge attendance at a political dinner with spouse who is a candidate for Sheriff.
Opinion No. 96-15 (7/16/96): Judge serving as member of judicial evaluation committee of a civic organization.
Opinion No. 96-19 (9/16/96): Non-candidate judge featured as the speaker at a county Lincoln Day Dinner promoted by a political party.
Opinion No. 98-02 (4/8/98): Propriety of a judge signing and circulating the nominating petitions of another judicial candidate.
Opinion No. 98-03 (4/8/98): Candidate using "Judge" on political advertising.
Opinion No. 98-06 (4/8/98): Judge writing a letter to the editor finding a judicial candidate "qualified."
Opinion 98-15 (9/9/98): The ability of a judicial candidate to continue to serve on a major party's county central committee as well as membership on the board of directors of a political action committee.
Other Materials on Judicial Campaign Ethics
Judicial Election/Campaign FAQs These FAQs are provided as a service to candidates seeking election to judicial office in Illinois and intended to provide general guidance on common questions faced by judicial candidates.
Ethical Campaign Practices for Illinois Judicial Candidates: As judicial elections become more "political,'' candidates sometimes lose sight of their special ethical obligations. Meanwhile, disciplinary agencies across the country are cracking down on election misconduct. This article describes the ethical limits imposed on Illinois judicial candidates.