Respondent appealed after the trial court ordered that he be involuntarily admitted for mental health treatment and be administered psychotropic medication. On appeal, respondent argued that the predisposition report did not comply with section 3-810 of the Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Code, that the court improperly combined hearings the petitions for admission and administration of medication, that he did not receive adequate notice of the petition for administration, that he was not given sufficient information regarding the proposed treatment, and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. The appellate court affirmed the order granting the petition for involuntary admission but reversed the order granting the petition for administration of psychotropic medication, finding that the State failed to present evidence that the respondent was notified in writing of treatment alternatives. (VANCIL and GRISCHOW, concurring)
