Can a contract be enforced against a third-party beneficiary?
The Fourth District Appellate Court addressed the issue of whether a contractual claim for subrogation could be enforced against a passenger in an automobile whose medical bills were paid out of the driver’s medical pay insurance policy, in American Family Group v. Cleveland, 356 Ill.App.3d 945, 827 N.E.2d 490 (4th Dist. 2005).
The first article of this edition is written by John Stalmack. Mr. Stalmack’s article discusses the cross examination of a medical expert’s personal opinion or personal practice.
The first article of this edition, written by Martin Glink, discusses the Illinois Supreme Court’s opinion in York v. Rush Presbyterian regarding apparent agency. Mr. Glink provides a thorough description of the facts of the case and a detailed explanation of the Court’s analysis and decision.
The first article of this edition, written by Yvonne M. O’Connor, discusses the Illinois Supreme Court’s decision in Marshall v. Burger King, 222 Ill.2d 422, 305 Ill.Dec. 897, 856 N.E.2d 1048 (Ill. 2006).