Education Law

Merchant v. Regional Board of School Trustees of Lake County, Illinois

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
School Districts
Citation
Case Number: 
2014 IL App (2d) 131277
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, September 30, 2014
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
Lake Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
JORGENSEN
Petitioners sought to detach their subdivision from boundaries of two school districts and annex it into boundaries of two different school districts. Regional School Board denied petition, after hearing. Given evidence as to travel times and distances to schools, and factors of "community of interest" and "whole child", and property values, and that evidence on Petitioners' preferences was uncontroverted, evidence showed that granting petition will provide some educational benefit to students of Petitioners' subdivision. Thus, Regional Board in finding otherwise; affirming circuit court's ruling reversing Regional Board's decision. (McLAREN and SPENCE, concurring.)

G.I.S. Venture v. Novak

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
School Districts
Citation
Case Number: 
2014 IL App (2d) 130244
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, September 30, 2014
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
Du Page Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
McLAREN
Court entered summary judgment in favor of County Treasurer and County Collector and 17 School District intervenors, and against Plaintiff taxpayers, on 54 tax-rate objections spanning 13 years. Districts provided evidence that no improper accumulation of assets would have resulted, had District properly transferred working cash fund assets to educational fund, and taxpayers stipulated to that evidence. No genuine issue as to any material fact remained, and thus summary judgment was proper. (BURKE and SPENCE, concurring.)

Doe v. Galster

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
School Law
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 13-2551
Decision Date: 
September 19, 2014
Federal District: 
E.D. Wisc.
Holding: 
Affirmed
Dist. Ct. did not err in granting defendants-school district administrators’ motion for summary judgment in Title VI and Title IX action, alleging that defendants failed to take appropriate steps to protect plaintiff-middle school student from bullying/physical assaults by her classmates. Plaintiff failed to establish that defendants were deliberately indifferent to physical harassment that plaintiff endured, where: (1) defendants responded to two observed incidents of physical assaults by directing classmates to cease said conduct and calling parents of said classmates; (2) defendants conducted full investigation of known incidents; and (3) school principal informed plaintiff’s parents of his recommendation to expel said classmates. Moreover, due to discretion given to defendants’ disciplinary decisions, plaintiff was not entitled to any specific remedial measures, and fact that defendants did not provide plaintiff with safety plan or grant her request to transfer to different school did not require different result in case.

Malinksi v. Grayslake Community High School District 127

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
School Districts
Citation
Case Number: 
2014 IL App (2d) 130685
Decision Date: 
Friday, August 22, 2014
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
Lake Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
HUTCHINSON
Plaintiff high school student alleged that other students subjected him to bullying, and that School District failed to provide safe environment, causing mental and physical injuries. Although School Code mandates that each school district create and maintain policy on bullying, a policy may afford school district discretion to determine whether bullying has occurred, what consequences will result, and remedial actions. Thus, how a school official handles instance of bullying fits within definition of a discretionary act, and Tort Immunity Act applies to immunize School District from liability. (BIRKETT and SPENCE, concurring.)

Kimble v. The Illinois State Board of Education

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Due Process
Citation
Case Number: 
2014 IL App (1st) 123436
Decision Date: 
Friday, July 18, 2014
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 5th Div.
Holding: 
Reversed.
Justice: 
GORDON
Tenured teacher was discharged based on allegations that she pushed and choked a 10-year-old student, when he refused to step out of line for gym class when teacher had told him he could not attend gym because he did not complete an assignment. Denial of due process at termination hearing, as student's hearsay statements were admitted, who teacher was unable to cross-examine as he was not present at hearing. Outcome of hearing was directly dependent on credibility of student's statements, and no eyewitnesses to alleged incidents. (McBRIDE and PALMER, concurring.)

Price v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
Due Process
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 13-2007
Decision Date: 
July 2, 2014
Federal District: 
N.D. Ill., E. Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed
Dist. Ct. did not err in granting defendant-school board's motion to dismiss plaintiff-tenured teacher's section 1983 action alleging that defendant violated plaintiff’s due process rights by laying her off from her position without offering her opportunity to transfer to vacant positions for which she was qualified, and by hiring non-tenured teachers to fill said positions. Ct. rejected plaintiff’s claim that her tenured status provided her with interest in transferring to said vacant positions that was protected by due process clause since no such interest was established in Illinois statutes.

The Board of Education of the City of Chicago v. The Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
School Districts
Citation
Case Number: 
2014 IL App (1st) 130285
Decision Date: 
Friday, June 27, 2014
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
IELRB, 5th Div.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
McBRIDE
Probationary apppointed teachers received notice they were being nonrenewed for the following school year, but were not informed that a DNH (Do Not Hire) designation had been placed in their personnel file with School Board, preventing them from being hired with the School District. School Board was not required to arbitrate grievances filed by union for placement of DNH designations. Board's policy of DNH designation for probationary teachers after being nonrenewed twice or given unsatisfactory performance rating grievances concerned Board's inherent managerial right to choose whom to hire. (PALMER, concurring; GORDON, dissenting.)

Frakes v. Peoria School District No. 150

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
School Districts
Citation
Case Number: 
2014 IL App (3d) 130306
Decision Date: 
Friday, June 20, 2014
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Peoria Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
CARTER
Plaintiffs filed for declaratory and injunctive relief, alleging that school district wrongfully terminated their employment as teachers. Court properly granted summary judgment for school district, which had given RIF dismissal notices to many teachers, some of whom were offered vacant positions, as they had recall rights under the School Code, after District received notice of its funding and could determine student enrollment. Court properly interpreted Section 24-12 of School Code as containing due process procedures for RIF dismissals of teachers. (SCHMIDT, concurring; WRIGHT, dissenting.)

Medina v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
School Districts
Citation
Case Number: 
2014 IL App (1st) 130588
Decision Date: 
Wednesday, June 11, 2014
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 3d Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
MASON
School Board dismissed Plaintiff as assistant principal because she lacked required administrative certification for position. Loss of tenured resulted from Plaintiff's voluntary decision to seek and accept promotion to nontenured assistant principal position, with knowledge that her right to remain ass assistant principal was contingent on her obtained required certification. Board did not make mistake or error of law in dismissal. (HYMAN and NEVILLE, concurring.)

House Bill 8

Topic: 
Employment and pregnancy
(Flowers, D-Chicago; Hutchinson, D-Chicago Heights) amends the Illinois Human Rights Act to prohibit unlawful discrimination by an employer for pregnancy and require reasonable accommodation to a job applicant or employee for issues related to pregnancy or childbirth. Passed both chambers.