Local Government Law

Paramount Media Group, Inc. v. Village of Bellwood

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
First Amendment
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 17-1562
Decision Date: 
July 16, 2019
Federal District: 
N.D. Ill., E. Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed

Dist. Ct. did not err in granting defendant-Village’s motion for summary judgment in plaintiff’s action, alleging that Village’s ordinance that banned issuance of new permits to build new billboards violated its First Amendment, equal protection and due process rights, where plaintiff had leased land with intention to build new billboard. Plaintiff lost its lease during pendency of case, and thus its request for injunctive relief from sign ban became moot. Also, plaintiff’s request for money relief arising out of sign ban was time-barred, where applicable limitations period was two years, and plaintiff waited four years from enactment of instant ordinance to file instant lawsuit. Also, plaintiff could not establish viable equal protection action, even though Village accepted competitor’s bid to lease property that could have new billboard erected, since plaintiff was not similarly-situated to competitor, where competitor offered lump sum payment of $800,000 for said lease, while plaintiff offered $1.1 million in installments payments over 40-year period.

Bradley v. Village of University Park, Illinois

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
Due Process
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 16-3456
Decision Date: 
July 16, 2019
Federal District: 
N.D. Ill., E. Div.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded

Dist. Ct. erred in granting defendant-Village and Village Mayor’s motion for summary judgment in plaintiff-former police chief’s section 1983 action alleging that defendants violated plaintiff’s due process rights by terminating him as police chief without due process of law. Parties agreed that plaintiff had protected property interest in his continued employment, and that although there was ample opportunity for hearing prior to his termination, plaintiff received no notice of charges or hearing prior to his termination. As such, plaintiff stated valid due process claim under section 1983, where Village acted through Mayor and other high ranking officials with policy-making authority to effectuate plaintiff’s termination. Ct. rejected Dist. Ct.’s determination that plaintiff was not entitled to section 1983 relief, even though Dist. Ct. found that: (1) instant termination was “random unauthorized state” act that affected plaintiff‘s federal and state due process rights; and (2) plaintiff had available state-court post-deprivation procedure to remedy his loss. It further held that: (1) public employee’s decision to violate both state and federal procedural requirements was insufficient grounds to excuse instant federal due process liability; and (2) in cases alleging due process violations by municipal policymakers, there is no need to inquire into whether municipal employee’s actions were “random and unauthorized.” (Dissent filed.)

House Bill 834

Topic: 
Equal Pay Act of 2003

(Moeller, D-Elgin; Castro, D-Elgin) amends the Equal Pay Act of 2003 to make it unlawful for an employer to require an employee to sign a contract or waiver that would prohibit the employee from disclosing or discussing information about the employee’s wages, salary, benefits, or other compensation. It also makes it unlawful for an employer to seek the wage or salary history, including benefits or other compensation, of a job applicant from any current or former employer with exceptions if it is a matter of public record or if the job applicant is a current employee and is applying for a position with the same current employer. Makes other changes. Sent to the Governor and would take effect 60 days after it becomes law (March 1, 2020). 
 

Hess v. Miller

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Easements
Citation
Case Number: 
2019 IL App (4th) 180591
Decision Date: 
Wednesday, June 5, 2019
District: 
4th Dist.
Division/County: 
Adams Co.
Holding: 
Reversed.
Justice: 
STEIGMANN

Landowners filed a complaint seeking an easement across a vacated bridge, after highway commissioner closed a township bridge which crossed over the drainage district’s property. Landowners failed to establish that vacated bridge is essential to the beneficial enjoyment of their land, and thus they do not have an implied easement across it. The gravel road access is a reasonable means of ingress and egress for landowners to reach their home.  (KNECHT and HARRIS, concurring.)

House Bill 1438

Topic: 
The Cannabis Regulation and Tax Act

(Cassidy, D-Chicago; Steans, D-Chicago) decriminalizes possession of small amounts of cannabis and replaces it with a tax and regulation system. A resident of Illinois (21 or older) may purchase cannabis products and possess 30 grams of cannabis flower, no more than 500 mg of THC in cannabis-infused product, and five grams of cannabis concentrate. It creates an automatic expungement through the governor’s clemency process for convictions up to 30 grams. For amounts of 30-500 grams, the state’s attorney or the individual can petition the court to vacate the conviction. Makes other changes. Passed both chambers. If signed into law, it takes effect on January 1, 2020. A more comprehensive summary may be found at the Marijuana Policy Project here

Senate Bill 2128

Topic: 
Legal transcription

(Harmon, D-Oak Park; Zalewski, D-Chicago) creates a licensed activity of the “practice of voice writer reporting.” This means reporting by the use of a system of repeating words of the speaker into a closed-microphone voice-dictation silencer that is capable of digital translation into text. It could be used for grand jury proceedings, court proceedings, court-related proceedings, pretrial examinations, depositions, motions, and related proceedings of like character. Passed both chambers. 

House Bill 2643

Topic: 
Home Repair and Remodeling Act

(Mason, D-Gurnee; Bush, D-Grayslake) provides that a consumer age 65 and older has 15, rather than three, business days within which to cancel a contract if the sale is made at the consumer’s home. Limits this 15-day right of cancellation to purchases made from an uninvited solicitor. Passed both chambers. 

 

 

Tzakis v. Berger Excavating Contractors, Inc.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Municipalities
Citation
Case Number: 
2019 IL App (1st) 170859
Decision Date: 
Thursday, May 30, 2019
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 4th Div,
Holding: 
Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Justice: 
GORDON

Plaintiffs filed suit for property damage to their homes resulting from storm water flooding. Plaintiffs allege that Defendant hospital corporation, which operates a hospital adjacent to Plaintiffs' neighborhood, constructed its hospital that caused hospital's storm water drainage system to discharge onto Plaintiffs' properties and caused flooding; and that various local public entities breached various duties to plaintiffs as to the drainage system. Court erred in applying Illinois Supreme Court's 2016 decision in Coleman v. East Joliet (which abolished the public duty rule) prospectively and thus erroneously granted Section 2-615 motion to dismiss on the basis of the public duty rule. Court properly dismissed counts based on violations of Tort Immunity Act and for adjacent property owner liability for failure to state a cause of action. Counts based on negligent nuisance, negligent trespass, and the takings clause were sufficient to withstand dismissal under Section 2-615. (McBRIDE and REYES, concurring.)

Senate Bill 75

Topic: 
Workplace Transparency Act

(Bush, D-Grayslake; Ann Williams, D-Chicago) prohibits an employer from requiring an employee or prospective employee as a precondition of employment to enter into an agreement or waiver that (1) prevents him or her from disclosing alleged unlawful employment practices, including sexual harassment, discrimination or retaliation; or (2) requires him or her to waive, arbitrate, or otherwise diminish any future claim related to unlawful employment practices. Voids any agreement or waiver to the extent it denies a substantive or procedural right or remedy. 

It does allow the parties to enter into: (1) an agreement or waiver if mutually agreed to and complies with certain disclosure and reporting requirements; and (2) a valid and enforceable confidential settlement agreements related to alleged unlawful employment practices if the parties comply with certain requirements designed to protect the employee and prospective employee. Provides for attorney’s fees and costs for a violation of the Act.

Amends The Human Right Act by defining “harassment” and prohibiting harassment and sexual harassment of nonemployees in the workplace. Holds the employer responsible for harassment or sexual harassment of nonemployees under certain conditions. Amends unlawful discrimination to be what is “actual or perceived” in the context of race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, age, sex, marital status, order of protection status, disability, military status, sexual orientation, pregnancy, or unfavorable discharge from the military. Expands “working environment” to be outside of the physical location to which an employee is assigned to perform their duties. Creates employer disclosure requirements regarding settlements of such claims. Requires the Illinois Department of Human Rights to develop a model sexual harassment prevention training program and to make it available to employers online at no cost. Every employer must use the model created or develop their own that must be the same or better than the Department’s and train their employees on a yearly basis subject to civil penalties for non-compliance. Provides for additional training and safety measures for employees of restaurants and bars to be available in English and Spanish.   

Amends The Victims’ Economic Security and Safety Act to define “gender violence” and include it as an entitlement for leave from employment that currently includes only domestic violence and sexual violence. 

Passed both chambers. Effective January 1, 2020. 

House Bill 2625

Topic: 
Judicial subcircuits

(Arroyo, D-Chicago; Martinez, D-Chicago) requires the General Assembly to redraw the subcircuit boundaries after every federal decennial census. The subcircuits shall be compact, contiguous, and substantially equal in population. Applies to Cook County and the 12th, 16th, 17th, 19th, and 22nd districts. In accordance with existing law, a resident judgeship assigned to a subcircuit shall continue to be assigned to that subcircuit. Any vacancy in a resident judgeship existing on or occurring after the effective date of a law redrawing the boundaries of the subcircuits shall be filled by a resident of the redrawn subcircuit.

Effective January 1, 2020.