Local Government Law

Public Act 99-586

Topic: 
FOIA

(Bryant, R-Mt. Vernon; Radogno, R-Lemont) provides that a requester that files an action seeking to enforce a binding opinion will have a rebuttable presumption that the public body willfully and intentionally failed to comply with this Act if: the attorney general issues a binding opinion under § 9.5 and the public body does not file for administrative review nor comply with it within 35 days after the binding opinion is served on the public body. This presumption may be rebutted by the public body showing that it is making a good-faith effort to comply with the binding opinion, but the compliance was not possible within the 35-day time frame. This section applies to binding opinions of the attorney general requested or issued on or after January 1, 2017.

It also allows the court to impose an additional penalty of up to $1,000 for each day the violation continues if: the public body fails to comply with the court’s order after 30 days; the court’s order is not appealed or stayed; and the court does not grant the public body additional time to comply with a court order to disclose public records. Changes apply to actions filed on or after January 1, 2017.

 

Fraternal Order of Police v. The City of Chicago

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
FOIA
Citation
Case Number: 
2016 IL App (1st) 143884
Decision Date: 
Friday, July 8, 2016
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 6th Div.
Holding: 
Vacated.
Justice: 
HALL

(Court order corrected 7/18/16.) Court entered preliminary injunctions in favor of Plaintiff Fraternal Order of Police, which enjoin Defendants from releasing certain information contained in records ("CRs") generated by police oversight agencies' investigations of citizen complaints of alleged police misconduct. Plaintiff failed to raise fair questions as to existence of rights claimed under Section 8.4 of parties' collective bargaining agreement and under Section 8 of Illinois Personnel Record Review Act, and thus has not shown any likelihood of success on the merits. CR files and related information are subject to disclosure under FOIA in absence of applicable exemption. Court was without legal basis to enjoin Defendants from releasing requested records.in aid of arbitrations. Record Review Act does not provide basis to withhold CR related information requested under FOIA.Amendment to Section 11 of Record Review Act exempts only "performance evaluations" from FOIA disclosure. (ROCHFORD and DELORT, concurring.)

Public Act 99-579

Topic: 
Property Tax Code

(McGuire, D-Crest Hill; Fortner, R-West Chicago) allows a board of review to serve by electronic means if the taxing district consents to electronic service and provides the board of review with a valid e-mail address for this purpose if a change in assessed valuation of $100,000 or more is sought. Effective July 15, 2016.

 

The Decatur Park District v. City of Decatur

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Employment Discrimination
Citation
Case Number: 
2016 IL App (4th) 150699
Decision Date: 
Thursday, June 30, 2016
District: 
4th Dist.
Division/County: 
Macon Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
POPE

Court entered written order dismissing Plaintiff Park District's petition for writ of prohibition against City and its Human Relations Commission, finding Commission has jurisdiction to proceed with its claim of unlawful retaliation against District pursuant to City Code. As legislature did not provide park district with authority to discriminate in employment matters but did provide for local governments to police discrimination, Commission was not interfering with District's statutory authority by bringing discrimination claim against District. City had authority to prohibit an employer from retaliating aginst employee for filing claim of racial discrimination. Park District Code does not permit park districts to terminate their employees in a discriminatory manner. Tort Immunity Act does not affect Commission's jurisdiction in this case. (KNECHT and TURNER, concurring.)

Senate Bill 2261

Topic: 
Statewide Relocation Towing Licensure Commission

(Haine, D-Alton; Zalewski, D-Chicago) clarifies that a county or municipality may assess an administrative fee for impounding vehicles only for violations listed in the current Vehicle Code. If the administrative hearing officer finds that a county or municipality exceeded its authority to impound a vehicle under the Vehicle Code, the county or municipality is liable to the car’s owner for the storage fees and reasonable attorney’s fees. Makes other changes. Passed both chambers.

 

 

House Bill 4379

Topic: 
Creates the Local Government Travel Expense Control Act

(McSweeney, R-Cary; Tom Cullerton, D-Villa Park) requires that school districts, community colleges, and non-home rule units of local government regulate travel, meal, and lodging expenses of officers and employees and members of their governing boards. Prohibits reimbursing entertainment expenses. The ordinance or resolution must include: (1) the types of official business for which travel, meal, and lodging expenses are allowable; (2) maximum allowable reimbursement for those expenses; and (3) a standardized form for submission of those expenses. Requires that the governing board or corporate authority must approve by a roll call vote at an open meeting any expenses of a member of the governing board and expenses of officers and employees over the maximum amount. The submitted documents are public records under the FOIA Act. Passed both chambers. 

Public Act 99-515

Topic: 
Open Meetings Act

(Ives, R-Wheaton; Connelly, R-Naperville) requires public bodies to give access to verbatim recordings and minutes of closed meetings to officials filling vacancies of elected officials in public bodies. Access is to be granted in the public body’s main office or official storage location in the presence of a records secretary, an administrative official of the public body, or any elected official of the public body. These records may not be recorded or removed from official storage unless the pubic body votes otherwise or so ordered by the courts. Effective June 20, 2016. 

House Bill 4658

Topic: 
Condominium and Common Interest Community Ombudsperson Act

(Nekritz, D-Buffalo Grove; Steans, D-Chicago) makes a number of changes to this Act. (1) Exempts from FOIA any information collected by the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation. This exemption does not extend to educational, training, and outreach material, statistical data, or operational information maintained by the Department in administering the Act. (2) Clarifies that neither the Ombudsperson nor the Department has the authority to consider matters that may constitute unlawful discrimination under local, State, or federal law. (3) Makes numerous technical changes including deleting the registration requirement by an entity. (4) Pushes back the repeal date of the entire Act by one year to July 1, 2022. Passed both chambers.