Local Government Law

Senne v. Village of Palatine, Ill.

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
Driver’s Privacy Protection Act
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 13-3671
Decision Date: 
April 28, 2015
Federal District: 
N.D. Ill., E. Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed
Dist. Ct. did not err in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment in plaintiff’s action alleging that officer’s disclosure of certain personal information on parking ticket issued to plaintiff violated Driver’s Privacy Protection Act. Plaintiff failed to present any evidence to counter police chief’s testimony during deposition with respect to permissible uses of personal information that pertained to locating parking violator, which officers wrote on parking tickets, and Ct. rejected plaintiff’s claim that police made no actual use of personal information placed on his parking ticket.

Mack Industries, Ltd. v. The Village of Dolton

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Tort Immunity Act
Citation
Case Number: 
2015 IL App (1st) 133620
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, March 31, 2015
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 5th Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
REYES
(Court opinion corrected 4/27/15.) Plaintiff company filed complaint arising out of Village's provision of water service. Village ordinance prohibited private supply of water to any structure where water service is introduced. Ordinance imposes joint and several liability on Plaintiff for any unpaid water charges for its properties. Plaintiff failed to allege facts showing that Village failed to perform ministerial tasks, and thus failed to allege tangible legal interest in case. Village's provision of water service represents exercise of its police power, not establishment of voluntary contractual relationship, and thus court properly dismissed breach of contract count. Plaintiff's allegations that Village issued citations without providing opportunity to cure fall within scope of immunity of Section 2-208 of Tort Immunity Act.(PALMER, concurring; GORDON, concurring in part and dissenting in part.)

Meade v. The City of Rockford

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Settlements
Citation
Case Number: 
2015 IL App (2d) 140645
Decision Date: 
Wednesday, April 8, 2015
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
Winnebago Co.
Holding: 
Certified questions answered.
Justice: 
SCHOSTOK
Parties reached settlement in personal injury case on the eve of trial, and trial date stricken. Plaintiff signed written settlement agreement drafted by City, but City Council voted to reject settlement agreement a few weeks later. Court denied Plaintiff's motion to enforce settlement agreement. Illinois Municipal Code does not exclude settlement of ongoing litigation from its requirement for "approval of all members holding office on city council for passage of any resolution to create liability against a city for expenditure of its money". City Ordinance for "consent of city council" for settlement of suits for more than $12,500 is not satisfied when all members of City Council Code and Regulation Committee extend their approval to City Attorney to make settlement offer in presence of judge during pretrial conference, when Committee members are present by phone. City Council members who gave approval to City Attorney during pretrial conference are not required to vote consistently with their previous authority when formal vote is taken at full Council meeting. Settlement agreement reached between a plaintiff and a municipal defendant during pretrial settlement conference is not enforceable against municipality notwithstanding City Council's subsequent vote to not approve this settlement. (HUDSON, concurring; McLAREN, dissenting.)

Scott v. City of Chicago

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Zoning
Citation
Case Number: 
2015 IL App (1st) 140570
Decision Date: 
Friday, March 13, 2015
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 5th Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
McBRIDE
(Court opinion corrected 4/2/15.) Two neighboring homeowners brought action to challenge city council's decision to rezone property from retail zoning to planned development allowing for mixed use 13-story building with 267 multi-family units. Plaintiffs' pre-suit notice did not satisfy municipal statutes. Plaintiffs' search of "authentic tax records" to give notice to other property owners was incomplete and not in strict compliance with notice statutes, and Plaintiffs failed to give notice to owners of tax exempt properties. Point for determining properties to be given pre-suit notice was "location" of subject property to be rezoned, not its common address. Strict compliance with pre-suit notice provision is required; substantial compliance is not adequate. (PALMER, concurring; GORDON, specially concurring.)

House Bill 2456

Topic: 
Attorney's fees
(Kay, R-Glen Carbon) Authorizes the Illinois Supreme Court to adopt rules to promote the prompt, efficient, and cost-effective resolution of civil actions in which the amount in controversy is more than $10,000 but does not exceed $100,000. If a circuit court grants or denies, in whole or in part, a motion to dismiss because of the absence of a basis in law or fact for the action, then the court may award costs and reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees to the prevailing party in amounts that the court determines are equitable and just. Authorizes reasonable deposition fees to be recovered as costs. Scheduled for hearing this Wednesday in House Judiciary Committee (Civil).

House Bill 3089

Topic: 
Citizen Participation Act
(Breen, R-Lombard) makes the following changes to the Act: (1) Amends the public policy provision of the Act to make as one of its intentions the ability to identify and provide a speedy resolution of meritless and retaliatory and provide damages in the form of attorney’s fees and costs to prevailing movants. (2) Provides that a claim is meritless if it lacks an essential element of the claim or fails against a reasonably foreseeable affirmative defense to that claim. (3) Provides that a plaintiff's claim is presumed to be retaliatory if the alleged basis for the claim is an act in furtherance of the constitutional rights to petition, speech, association, and participation in government. (4) Provides that a motion under the Act may be made as a motion to dismiss or as a motion for summary judgment or joined with other motions. (5) Provides that “attorney’s fees and costs” include reasonable trial and appellate attorney’s fees and costs incurred in connection with a motion under the Act, including, but not limited to, fees and costs for discovery that relates to such a motion. Scheduled for hearing next Wednesday in House Judiciary Committee.

Senate Bill 1447

Topic: 
Administrative Review Law
(Kotowski, D-Park Ridge) provides that “parties of record” does not include a private citizen who was not acting in an official capacity or whose participation in the agency proceedings was limited to his or her attendance or testimony at a public hearing. Scheduled for hearing next Tuesday in Senate Judiciary Committee.

Foxxxy Ladyz Adult World, Inc. v. Village of Dix, Illinois

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
First Amendment
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 14-1642
Decision Date: 
March 10, 2015
Federal District: 
S.D. Ill.
Holding: 
Affirmed and reversed in part and remanded
Dist. Ct. erred in dismissing plaintiff-adult night club’s First Amendment challenge to defendant’s ordinance that banned public nudity/nude dancing that occurred at plaintiff’s night club, even though defendant argued that said ban was aimed at preserving “social order, health, welfare and safety of citizens.” Defendant failed to allege existence of tangible evidence that would establish link between prohibited nude dancing and cited harmful secondary effects. However, Dist. Ct. did not err in dismissing plaintiffs’ challenge to two ordinances that essentially banned plaintiff’s customers from bringing liquor into plaintiff’s night club, since said ban did not violate either Illinois Liquor Control Act or Municipal Code and otherwise had rational basis. Moreover, First Amendment does not entitle bar, its dancers or patrons to have alcohol available during presentation of nude or semi-nude dancing.

House Bill 1417

Topic: 
Court-appointed counsel
(Christian Mitchell, D-Chicago) allows a court, on the motion of court-appointed counsel, to conduct a hearing on the amount of payment to court-appointed counsel. Under current law the State’s Attorney or the court may now make this motion. This bill adds the court-appointed counsel as well. Assigned to House Rules Committee.

Senate Bill 1248

Topic: 
Interest on judgments and supplementary proceedings
(Biss, D-Skokie) amends the Code of Civil Procedure on judgments and supplementary proceedings to do several things. (1) Repeals the 9% interest on judgments and replaces it with a maximum rate equal to the weekly average one-year constant maturity treasury yield for the preceding calendar year. It doesn’t amend the 6% interest rate for units of local governments. (2) Reduces what can be deducted from a debtor’s wages from 15% to 10% of gross weekly wages or the amount by which the disposable earnings for a week exceed the total of 50 (now, 45) times the federal minimum wage or the Illinois minimum hourly wage or the local minimum hourly wage law to which the debtor's employer is subject, whichever is greater. (3) Makes exempt from execution moneys held in education expense accounts and similar education savings accounts, such as ABLE accounts and 529 funds. (4) Makes exempt from execution an amount not to exceed $6,000, held by the debtor in the form of cash, a bank account, accrued interest, dividends, the loan or redemption value of a life insurance policy, or other account. A financial institution may not freeze the debtor’s access to turn over to the judgment creditor the amount in the debtor’s account that is $6,000 less, but shall inform the court and the judgment creditor of the exempt amount. The judgment creditor may, upon notice to the financial institution and the debtor, petition the court for a hearing to establish that the funds in the account are not exempt. (5) Increases the exempted amounts in Section 12-1001 annually per the Consumer Price Index if there is a 10% increase in the CPI for the preceding year. Just introduced.