Local Government Law

Green Valley Investments, LLC v. Winnebago County, Wisc.

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
First Amendment
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 14-2473
Decision Date: 
July 27, 2015
Federal District: 
E.D. Wisc.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded
Defendant’s zoning ordinance, which required plaintiff to seek permits to operate cabaret featuring nude dancing within area authorized by zoning law, violated First Amendment, since it constituted impermissible prior restraint that served to limit expressive activity based on content of said activity, as well as defendant’s determination as to whether proposed cabaret would be detrimental to public welfare. Moreover, defendant could not establish presence of powerful overriding interest for imposing prior restraint. Dist. Ct. erred, though, in resolving issues as to whether remaining portions of ordinance could still be applied to plaintiff’s cabaret based on severability clause in ordinance, since such land-use issues are matters that should be resolved in state court, even though said matters potentially fell within Dist. Ct.‘s supplemental jurisdiction.

Tipton v. Madison County, Illinois

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Zoning
Citation
Case Number: 
2015 IL App (5th) 140186
Decision Date: 
Monday, June 22, 2015
District: 
5th Dist.
Division/County: 
Madison Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
CHAPMAN
Plaintiff built a 60 x 128-hoot pole barn on his property, which was zoned for agricultural use. Plaintiff intended to use building to store equipment for use in his off-site concrete construction business. County Board denied application of Plaintiff to change zoning of his property to a planned business district. Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies related to determination of County planning and development officials that Plaintiff's use of property was prohibited under county ordinance, as he failed to seek review of that determination. It is reasonable for zoning officials to take into account the area's trend toward residential development, and record shows ample evidence that Plaintiff's proposed use would be inconsistent with use of surrounding properties. (CATES and SCHWARM, concurring.)

Senate Bill 86

Topic: 
Collection of fines and penalties
(Althoff, R-McHenry; Franks, D-Marengo) amends the Counties Code to allow a default in the payment of a fine or penalty or any installment to be collected in any way that any other monetary judgment is collected. Allows the state’s attorney to retain attorneys and private collection agents to collect them and their fees to be charged to the offender. Passed both chambers.

House Bill 2474

Topic: 
County budgets
(Nekritz, D-Buffalo Grove; Morrison, D-Deerfield) requires a budget to be made available to public inspection and provided to the public at a public meeting at least 15 days prior to final action taken on that budget in all counties not required by law to pass an annual appropriation bill within the first quarter of the fiscal year and required to adopt each year an annual budget for the succeeding fiscal year. Allows a county board to act at a public meeting to amend a budget after notice has been given. Requires notices pertaining to the budget meeting and the proposed budget to be posted on the county’s official website, if it maintains one. If a county does not maintain a website, it requires the county to comply with the Open Meetings Act in giving notice of such agenda items and make the proposed budget available for public inspection. Passed both chambers.

House Bill 175

Topic: 
Open Meetings Act
(McSweeney, R-Cary; Duffy, R-Barrington) creates what is essentially a statute of repose for requests for review to be filed with the Public Access Counselor. If the facts concerning the violation are not discovered within 60 days of the violation but discovered at a later date by a person using reasonable diligence, the request must be made within two years after the alleged violation. Passed both chambers.

House Bill 2474

Topic: 
County budgets
(Nekritz, D-Buffalo Grove; Morrison, D-Deerfield) requires a budget to be made available to public inspection and provided to the public at a public meeting at least 15 days prior to final action taken on that budget in all counties not required by law to pass an annual appropriation bill within the first quarter of the fiscal year and required to adopt each year an annual budget for the succeeding fiscal year. Allows a county board to act at a public meeting to amend a budget after notice has been given. Requires notices pertaining to the budget meeting and the proposed budget to be posted on the county’s official website, if it maintains one. If a county does not maintain a website, it requires the county to comply with the Open Meetings Act in giving notice of such agenda items and make the proposed budget available for public inspection. Passed both chambers.

House Bill 175

Topic: 
Open Meetings Act
(McSweeney, R-Cary; Duffy, R-Barrington) creates what is essentially a statute of repose for requests for review to be filed with the Public Access Counselor. If the facts concerning the violation are not discovered within 60 days of the violation but discovered at a later date by a person using reasonable diligence, the request must be made within two years after the alleged violation. Passed both chambers.

Senate Bill 1630

Topic: 
Judicial facilities fee
(Holmes, D-Aurora; Keith Wheeler, R-Oswego) authorizes the Kane County Board, with concurrence of the chief judge of the circuit, to impose a judicial facilities fee not to exceed $30. It will be imposed on civil litigants and defendants in criminal cases. Passed both chambers.