Real Estate Law

In re Application for a Tax Deed

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Tax Deeds
Citation
Case Number: 
2018 IL App (5th) 170170
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, June 5, 2018
District: 
5th Dist.
Division/County: 
Saline Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
OVERSTREET

(Modified upon denial of rehearing 1/7/19.) Court granted equitable redemption in a tax deed sale proceeding to the property's owners. Although a 1990 amendment to section 22-45 of Property Tax Code restricted equitable relief as to vacating a tax deed, in order to preserve and uphold the policy goals of tax deed merchantability and equity to taxpayers, section 22-45, as amended, does not preclude courts' equitable powers as to redemption prior to issuance of a tax deed. Court properly favored redemption and sought to give liberal construction to redemption laws.(CHAPMAN and CATES, concurring.)

Siena at Old Orchard Condominium Ass’n v. Siena at Old Orchard, L.L.C.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Condominiums
Citation
Case Number: 
2018 IL App (1st) 182133
Decision Date: 
Thursday, December 27, 2018
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 4th Div,
Holding: 
Reversed.
Justice: 
GORDON

Amendment to condominium declaration--that removed the requirement that parties submit disputes to mediation and then, if not settled, to arbitration--is not retroactive, but affected only future disputes. Thus, preamended version of the declaration governs cause of action which arose prior to effective date of amendment.(McBRIDE and REYES, concurring.)

Ronkowski v. U.S.

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
Quiet Title
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 18-2269
Decision Date: 
December 28, 2018
Federal District: 
W.D. Wisc.
Holding: 
Affirmed

Dist. Ct. did not err in granting defendant-Forrest Service’s motion for summary judgment in plaintiff-landowner’s action alleging that they were entitled to easement over defendant’s land for vehicular access to their property after plaintiffs had used and maintained said proposed easement since 1972. Fact that plaintiffs can access their property by alternative route, even if said route was unpaved and contained deep ruts, precludes plaintiffs from establishing easement by necessity, since they cannot show that they cannot otherwise access public road from their property via alternative route. Moreover, plaintiffs also could not show for purposes of establishing easement by implication that they would be not be able to enjoy their property without proposed easement.

 

The Forest Preserve District of Cook County v. Royalty Properties, LLC

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2018 IL App (1st) 181323
Decision Date: 
Thursday, December 20, 2018
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 4th Div,
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
GORDON

After evidentiary hearing, court entered order appointing a receiver during pendency of a foreclosure action as to 40-acre horse farm. Court properly found Forest Preserve as mortgagee in possession during pendency of foreclosure proceedings.Court's finding that property was clearly agricultural in nature, and that Property was used predominantly for growing and harvesting of hay and the feeding, breeding, and management of horses, was not against manifest weight of the evidence. (McBRIDE and REYES, concurring.)

McGinley Partners, LLC v. Royalty Properties, LLC

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Promissory Notes
Citation
Case Number: 
2018 IL App (1st) 172976
Decision Date: 
Thursday, December 20, 2018
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 4th Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
GORDON

Plaqintiff sued to enforce a note and guaranty executed by Defendants in connection with purchase of a horse farm. Court entered summary judgment ot Plaintiff and entered judgment against Defendants for $8.32 million. Court denied Defendants' Section 2-1401 petition to vacate judgment. Court did not abuse its discretion in finding that Defendants failed to show due diligence in presenting their defense in the underlying suit, where Defendants had actual knowledge of the intercreditor agreement no later than 8 months prior to entry of summary judgment. (McBRIDE and REYES, concurring.)

Hometown Condominium Association No. 2 v. Mohammed

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Condominium Property Act
Citation
Case Number: 
2018 IL App (2d) 171030
Decision Date: 
Thursday, November 29, 2018
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
Kane Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
BURKE

Condominium Association (HOA) created a lien against a unit, based on owners' failure to pay assessments and late fees for several years. Defendant purchased that unit at a sheriff's sale after foreclosure but did not pay his assessments either. HOA then filed complaint for forcible entry and detainer and breach of contract. Defendant's partial payment of 1 month of postforeclosure assessments, made 17 months after confirmation of sale, did not extinguish the lien. A foreclosure purchaser must pay the postforeclosure sale assessments to confirm extinguishment of the lien, which Defendant failed to do. (HUDSON and BIRKETT, concurring.)

Citibank N.A. v. Busuioc

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Mortgage Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2018 IL App (1st) 172956
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, December 4, 2018
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 6th Div,
Holding: 
Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.
Justice: 
HARRIS

Court properly granted summary judgment for Plaintiff in mortgage foreclosure action. Loan was subject to an adjustable interest rate. No question of fact exists as to interest rate and per diem. Affidavit was signed and sworn before a notary in Florida, and Rule 191 does not require administration of an oath. As affidavit complies with Illinois law, court properly relied on it when granting summary judgment.(DELORT and CUNNINGHAM, concurring.)

Wells Fargo Bank v. Roundtree

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2018 IL App (1st) 172912
Decision Date: 
Wednesday, November 7, 2018
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 3rd Div,
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
FITZGERALD SMITH

Court entered order approving sale of foreclosed property. Court properly denied Defendant's petition to vacate that order. Defendant retroactively waived her objection to jurisdiction. Defendant failed to file her petition within 60 days of first participating in a hearing without filing an appearance, or of first filing official appearance, and did not seek extension of 60-day deadline. Thus, Section 15-1505.6 of Mortgage Foreclosure Law barred her from filing her challenge to the court's personal jurisdiction over her. (HOWSE and COBBS, concurring.)

JP Morgan Chase Bank v. Talaganov

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Mortgage Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2018 IL App (1st) 180578
Decision Date: 
Friday, November 2, 2018
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 6th Div,
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
HARRIS

Court, in mortgage foreclosure proceeding, properly granted petition for turnover of surplus funds filed by holder of a junior mortgage. When a party seeks to establish a lien for purpose of distributing surplus proceeds, it is not required that amount of lien be proved up or adjudicated prior to distributing the proceeds. A valid junior lien may be satisfied under Illinois foreclosure law. (CUNNINGHAM and CONNORS, concurring.)