House Bill 2430
(Guzzardi, D-Chicago) repeals this Act. It has just been introduced.
(Guzzardi, D-Chicago) repeals this Act. It has just been introduced.
(Barickman, R-Bloomington) provides a means for correcting inadvertent failures to correctly name necessary parties in actions for administrative review, which are called misnomers.
(1) It amends the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) to mandate that final administrative orders list all of the parties of record together with their last known address of record. The final order must also include whether there are any agency rules requiring a motion for reconsideration as a part of obtaining a reviewable final administrative decision and, if so, the rules citation.
(2) It amends the ARL to prohibit an action for administrative review to be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction based on the misnomer of any agency that is properly served with summons issued in the action within the applicable time limits. It also prohibits dismissal for failure to perfectly name an agent if a timely action of administrative review has been filed that identifies the final administrative decision under review and makes a good faith effort to properly name the administrative agency.
(3) It amends the ARL to allow a court to correct misnomers for an erroneous identification of the administrative agency.
Senate Bill 584 passed out of Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday but will receive some tweaking amendments.
After court entered judgment of foreclosure, Defendant argued that mortgage was void because original lender was not licensed at time loan was originated pursuant to Residential Mortgage License Act of 1987. There is no public policy requiring that mortgage contracts be held void when an entity is not licensed pursuant to the License Act. Thus, court properly entered judgment of foreclosure and order approving sale in mortgage foreclosure action. (GORDON and LAMPKIN, concurring.)
Condo association filed forcible entry and detainer action against Defendant, alleging breach of contract, for failure to pay her condominium assessments. Court entered order for possession, and then entered judgment for Plaintiff. Unit was then foreclosed upon by bank. As condo association pursued contract theory of recovery, instead of statutory theory of recovery under Condominium Property Act or Forcible Entry and Detainer Act, it cannot avail itself of any attorney fee remedies permitted under those acts. As Plaintiff failed to identify any written instrument or contract providing for its recovery of attorney fees, court properly denied Plaintiff's petition for attorney's fees. (HOFFMAN and CUNNINGHAM, concurring.)
Court properly dismissed, on grounds of res judicata, Plaintiff's claim to quiet title to a garage in her condominium complex. A final judgment was entered in forcible entry and detainer action, and there was identity of cause of action, as question of ownership was at issue in both cases, and court in forcible entry case concluded that Defendant had title to garage. No sanctions warranted for Plaintiff bringing appeal, as issues raised are not devoid of arguable merit.(HUDSON and SPENCE, concurring.)
(Barickman, R-Bloomington) provides that if a landlord or the landlord's attorney is unable to personally serve the demand on the tenant, then constructive service of the demand may be used. Senate Bill 758 was just introduced.
Court properly denied LLC's motion to quash service of process in foreclosure action, as motion was untimely. Section 15-1505.6(a) of Foreclosure Law provides a 60-day time period for filing of a motion to quash service in foreclosure case. Statutory 60-day time period was not tolled while DWP was in effect.(WRIGHT, concurring; HOLDRIDGE, dissenting.)
This case presents question as to whether wholly owned subsidiary of mortagee that purchased condominium at foreclosure sale is considered “mortgagee” under section 9(g)(4) of Illinois Condominium Property Act, so that third-party who later purchased condominium from subsidiary becomes liable for payment of six months delinquent assessments. Trial court found that defendant, as third-party purchaser of condominium from subsidiary, was not liable for any past due assessments. Appellate Court, in reversing trial court, found that instant subsidiary was “mortgagee” since it was acting on Bank’s behalf at judicial sale, thus triggering defendant’s obligation to pay assessments during six months preceding plaintiff-association’s action to enforce its lien. In its petition for leave to appeal, defendant argued that there was no evidence establishing that subsidiary was designated to act on behalf of Bank at foreclosure sale.
(Rita, D-Blue Island) provides that in any residential real estate closing document in which real estate appraisal fees are shown, the fee paid to an appraiser must be shown separately from the fee paid to an appraisal management company. House Bill 723 was just introduced.
(Barickman, R-Bloomington) provides a means for correcting inadvertent failures to name necessary parties in actions for administrative review.
(1) It amends the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) to mandate that final administrative orders list all of the parties of record together with their last known address of record. The final order must also include whether there are any agency rules requiring a motion for reconsideration as a part of obtaining a reviewable final administrative decision and, if so, the rules citation.
(2) It also amends the APA to allow service by electronic mail if agreed to by the parties in contested cases.
(3) It amends the Administrative Review Law (ARL) in the Code of Civil Procedure to state that this Article is to be liberally construed in the interests of justice to grant an orderly method of judicial review of administrative agency decisions.
(4) It amends the ARL to prohibit an action for administrative review to be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction based on the misnomer of any agency that is properly served with summons issued in the action within the applicable time limits. It also prohibits dismissal for failure to perfectly name an agent if a timely action of administrative review has been filed that identifies the final administrative decision under review and makes a good faith effort to properly name the administrative agency.
(5) It amends the ARL to allow a court to correct misnomers for an erroneous identification of the administrative agency.
Senate Bill 584 was just introduced.