Real Estate Law

The Illinois State Toll Highway Authority v. South Barrington Office Center

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Eminent Domain
Citation
Case Number: 
2016 IL App (1st) 150960
Decision Date: 
Thursday, June 30, 2016
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 6th Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
ROCHFORD

Tollway Authority filed suit for condemnation against various Defendants, seeking to use its eminent domain power to acquire interests in 3 parcels of property to complete improvements to I-90. Court's factual findings were correct. Tollway Authority's Board passed Resolution which clearly authorized Authority to condemn entire property if it could not be purchased, in that resolution at the very least "reasonably described" entirety of property. The law requires a reasonable description, not an exact one, for resolution for eminent domain. (HOFFMAN and DELORT, concurring.)

House Bill 4633

Topic: 
Unclaimed Life Insurance Benefits Act

(Martwick, D-Chicago; Haine, D-Alton) requires insurers to periodically use the federal Death Master File to determine if a policyholder has died but the death benefits have not been made. If a match is found but the beneficiaries do not file a claim within 120 days, the insurer is required to make a good-faith effort to locate them. This Act will apply to all policies, annuity contracts, and retained asset accounts in force on after January 1, 2017. Passed both chambers. 

ALSJ, Inc. v. Kurtz

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Mortgage Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2016 IL App (2d) 150492
Decision Date: 
Thursday, June 30, 2016
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
DuPage Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
JORGENSEN

Plaintiff filed mortgage foreclosure complaint. Court found that Defendant defaulted on the loan, but also found that Plaintiff violated Mortgage Fraud Act, for “facially outrageous” 1-year balloon mortgage. Court rescinded mortgage documents and awarded attorney fees for Defendant. In combination with its credibility determinations, court reasonably favored Defendant’s documentary evidence over Plaintiff’s. Court did not abuse its discretion in declining to account for potential windfall to Defendant by ordering equitable remedy of rescission. Court was not precluded from awarding attorney fees, which are a form of relief under Consumer Fraud Act. (McLAREN and BIRKETT, concurring.)

Senate Bill 2741

Topic: 
Common Interest Community Association Act

(Haine, D-Alton; Beiser, D-Alton) allows an association to correct an error, omission, or inconsistency in the community instruments of the association by an amendment adopted by vote of two-thirds of the board of directors without a membership vote. This applies to correct an omission, error, or inconsistency so that the community instruments conform to the Act or to another applicable law. Passed both chambers. 

Senate Bill 2359

Topic: 
Condominium Property Act

(Mulroe, D-Chicago; Martwick, D-Chicago) allows a board of managers to assign the right of the association to future income from common expenses or other sources and to mortgage or pledge substantially all of the remaining assets of the association by a majority vote of the entire board. Passed both chambers.

Senate Bill 2358

Topic: 
Common Interest Community Association Act and the Condominium Property Act

(Mulroe, D-Chicago; Martwick, D-Chicago) provides that any assignment of a developer’s interest in the property is not effective until the successor obtains the assignment in writing and records it. Passed both chambers.

Senate Bill 2354

Topic: 
Common Interest Community Association Act and the Condominium Property Act

(Haine, D-Alton; Martwick, D-Chicago) allows a board to close any portion of a noticed meeting or meet separately from a noticed meeting to do the following: (1) “Discuss” instead of “consider” appointment, employment, engagement, or dismissal of an employee, independent contractor, agent, or other provider of goods and services. (2) Interview a potential employee, independent contractor, agent, or other provider of goods and services. (3) Consult with the association’s legal counsel. Passed both chambers. 

Old Second National Bank v. Jafry

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Mortgage Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2016 IL App (2d) 150825
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, June 28, 2016
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
DuPage Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
BURKE

Plaintiff bank obtained judgment of foreclosure on property, and Bank purchased property at sheriff's sale. Court approved sale and entered deficiency judgment, and 4 months later Bank sold property for amount greater than purchase price at sheriff's sale. Bank then initiated enforcement proceedings against Defendants, seeking full deficiency judgment. When a mortgagee obtains a deficiency judgment against mortgagor in foreclosure action, purchases property at judicial sale, and then resells it to a third party for amount in excess of price paid at judicial sale, mortgagor is not entitled to setoff in enforcement proceedings to recover deficiency judgment, because foreclosure terminates mortgagor-mortgagee relationship. (HUDSON, concurring; SCHOSTOK, dissenting.)

Senate Bill 2359

Topic: 
Condominium Property Act

(Mulroe, D-Chicago; Martwick, D-Chicago) deletes the ability of condominium instruments to supersede a majority vote of the entire board of managers to do the following: assign the right of the association to future income from common expenses or other sources and to mortgage or pledge substantially all of the remaining assets of the association. Passed both chambers.