Voluntarily dismissing 'without prejudice'? Don't be so sure

In the latest ISBA General Practice, Solo & Small Firm newsletter, Jewel Kline has a good summary of the dangers posed by the Illinois Supreme Court's 2008 decision in Hudson v. City of Chicago. "One would think that if [an] attorney who takes [a] voluntary dismissal puts the words 'without prejudice' in the dismissal order, the plaintiff’s claim would be safe [if filed again within the deadline]," she writes. "Not any more. The words 'without prejudice' in a voluntary dismissal order will not automatically prevent a re-filed case from being dismissed based on res judicata." How did we come to this point, and how can you avoid this trap? Read her article and find out.
Posted on June 15, 2010 by Mark S. Mathewson
Filed under: 

Login to post comments