May 2011 Construction Law Newsletter
May 2011, vol. 1, no. 1
New! 2010 Guide to Illinois Statutes for Attorneys' Fee - This handy edition lists provisions in the Illinois Compiled Statutes that authorize the court to order one party to pay the attorney fees of another. No matter what your practice area, this book will save you time – and could save you money! Buy it at http://www.isba.org/store/books/2010attorneysfees
Now every article is the start of a discussion. If you're a member of the Construction Law Section, you can comment on any of the articles that appear below.
In This Issue…
- Editor’s note
An introduction to the inaugural issue from Editor Samuel Levine.
- Note from Construction Law Section Council Chair
A message from Construction Law Chair Howard Feldman.
- Construction project delivery methods: Which is best for you?
A look at the most common types of construction project delivery methods, including the newest methods that have received significant acclaim.
- Recent amendment guts the Arbitration Act
Arbitration was devised as a dispute resolution mechanism to avoid costly and timely battles in court and to ensure confidentiality. Unfortunately, the author writes, the recent amendment to the Arbitration Act opens the door to circumvent the purpose of arbitration.
Related Court Cases
Archon Construction Company Inc. v. U.S. Shelter, LLC
Plaintiff construction company was hired by Defendant to install sanitary sewer system in subdivision. After completion of installation, city's engineering inspector, after viewing video of system, required additional work. Defendant refused to pay Plaintiff for extra work done by Plaintiff. The extra work Plaintiff did was "part and parcel" of contract between parties. Court properly deined Plaintiff's quantum meruit claim, as existence of an express contract on same subject matter dooms that claim. Court properly found that Defendant did not establish causal link between any damages it suffered and any breach by Plaintiff, and thus court properly denied Defendant's counterclaim for breach of contract. (McBRIDE and BURKE, concurring.)
Duty to Defend
Pekin Insurance Co. v. Centex Homes
(Court opinion corrected 3/2/17.) Employee was injured while working on construction of building owned by 2 Defendants. Employee of construction company filed underlying personal injury suit against both Defendants, who tendered defense to insurer who had issued commercial general liability policy to employer. One Defendant, but not the other, is an additional insured under policy, and insurer does have a duty to defend that Defendant in underlying suit, as there is a potential that this Defendant, because it retained sufficient operative control of element of construction at issue, would be vicariously liable for negligence by construction company. (HARRIS and SIMON, concurring.)
Disclaimer: This newsletter is for subscribers’ personal use only; redistribution is prohibited. Copyright Illinois State Bar Association. Statements or expressions of opinion appearing herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Association or Editors, and likewise the publication of any advertisement is not to be construed as an endorsement of the product or service offered unless it is specifically stated in the ad that there is such approval or endorsement.