Child Law

In re: Jerome S., a Minor

Illinois Appellate Court
Criminal Court
Juvenile Law
Citation
Case Number: 
2012 IL App (4th) 100862
Decision Date: 
Monday, April 23, 2012
District: 
4th Dist.
Division/County: 
Champaign Co.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Justice: 
COOK
Respondent, while being transported on school bus to therapeutic day school for children with mental health problems, struck school bus monitor in the arms. Charge was elevated to aggravated battery based on allegation that bus monitor was public transportation employee. School bus monitor is not a public transportation employee within meaning of aggravated-battery statute. School buses are not available to the general public; and legislature has made numerous distinctions between "school buses" and "public transportation." (TURNER and APPLETON, concurring.)

In the Interest of Julian K., Minor

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Termination of Parental Rights
Citation
Case Number: 
2012 IL App (1st) 112841
Decision Date: 
Friday, March 9, 2012
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co.,6th Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
R.E. GORDON
(Court opinion corrected 4/9/12.) Respondent-mother's parental rights were terminated as to her son, age 10, who had been living with Respondent's sister in California for two years. Child had been found wandering streets alone at age 5, mother's apartment was continually filthy, and mother often failed drug tests or failed to report for drug tests; court's finding of unfitness was not against manifest weight of evidence. Court's finding that adoption of child by aunt and her husband was in best interests of child was not against manifest weight of evidence. (LAMPKIN and PALMER, concurring.)

In re Shauntae P. and Kyla P.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Termination of Parental Rights
Citation
Case Number: 
2012 IL App (1st) 112280
Decision Date: 
Thursday, April 5, 2012
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 4th Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
FITZGERALD SMITH
Court's finding of mother's unfitness, on three separate statutory grounds, was supported by manifest weight of evidence. Mother's visits with children were inconsistent, as her behavior and choices, including her decision to move to Colorado, interfered with visits, and she continued to abuse drugs and failed to undergo drug evaluation. Evidence at best interests hearing support conclusion that statutory factors weight strongly in favor of terminating mother's parental rights and placing her two minor children for adoption by current foster parents. (LAVIN and STERBA, concurring.)

In re Tamera W., a Minor

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Termination of Parental Rights
Citation
Case Number: 
2012 IL App (2d) 111131
Decision Date: 
Thursday, March 29, 2012
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
Winnebago Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
McLAREN
Court's finding that child's father was unfit, and terminating his parental rights, was not against manifest weight of evidence. Court is not required to admonish a parent as to consequences of his admission of unfitness or to inquire as to voluntariness of admission. Supreme Court Rule 402 admonishments apply to criminal proceedings, not to termination of parental rights proceedings. No per se conflict of interest presented, even though several different attorneys from public defender's office had represented father in succession, none of whom had knowledge or involvement with prior juvenile case in which PD's office represented the mother as a ward of court. Evidence proved that father would not be able to provide child with a stable home environment or resources necessary for her special needs. (BURKE and BIRKETT, concurring.)

House Bill 4028

Topic: 
Adoption Act
(Feigenholtz, D-Chicago) rewrites and re-formats parts of the Adoption Act. (1) It rewrites the form for a final and irrevocable consent to adoption by a specified person or persons in DCFS cases. (2) It creates the Adoption Advisory Council to replace the two current advisory groups. (3) Provides that a parent of a child in whose interest a petition under the Juvenile Court Act of 1987 alleging that the child is abused, neglected, or dependent is pending may, with the approval of DCFS, execute a consent to adoption by a specified person or persons in whose physical custody the child is now residing (rather than has resided for at least six months, or three months if the child is under one year of age, or in whose custody at least one sibling of the child who is a subject of the consent has resided for at least six months and the child who is the subject of the consent is currently residing in the foster home). (4) Provides that a consent to adoption by specified persons on the form shall have no effect on a court's determination of custody or visitation under the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act or the Illinois Religious Freedom Act. Passed the House 89-18-1.

Senate Bill 2569

Topic: 
Dissipation of marital assets
(Mulroe, D-Chicago) amends the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act to require notice and impose time limits before a litigant can claim dissipation of marital and non-marital assets and clarifies the child support section of the Act by codifying existing practice and case law. It creates a three-step procedure as follows for dissipation claims: (1) Notice of intent to claim dissipation must be filed no later than 60 days before trial or 30 days after discovery closes, whichever is later;(2) Notice must identify the property dissipated, a time frame of when the marriage began to break down, and when the dissipation occurred; and (3) Notice must be filed with the clerk of the court and served under applicable rules. No dissipation may be considered if it occurred five years before filing of dissolution of marriage if the spouse had no knowledge of the dissipation, or three years after the party claiming dissipation knew, or should have known, of the dissipation. It also codifies existing practice and case law by granting the court the right to order both parties to contribute to expenses for child-care, school, extracurricular activities, and health expenses not covered by health insurance in addition to statutory child support. Passed the Senate

In re Kenneth W.

Illinois Appellate Court
Criminal Court
Juvenile Sex Offenders
Citation
Case Number: 
2012 IL App (1st) 101787
Decision Date: 
Friday, February 17, 2012
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co.,6th Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
R.E. GORDON
(Court opinion corrected 3/23/12.) Respondent, age 15, was charged with aggravated criminal sexual abuse and criminal sexual abuse of his four-year-old neice, and was adjudicated a delinquent and sentenced to indeterminate term of custody until his 21st birthday. Court ruled that Respondent was capable of making a knowing and intelligent waiver of his Miranda rights, in resolving credibility conflict of two psychologists by finding one's conclusions more persuasive than the other. Victim's statements to her father were nontestimonial, and father's testimony about statements did not violate confrontation clause. Evidence against Respondent was overwhelming, and thus no reasonable probability that trier of fact would have acquitted Respondent absent potential error in admitting detective's testimony about other out-of-court statements made by victim. (GARCIA and LAMPKIN, concurring.)

In re W.R., E.H., and V.R.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Conflict of Interest
Citation
Case Number: 
2012 IL App (3d) 110179
Decision Date: 
Monday, March 12, 2012
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Will Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
HOLDRIDGE
Court properly determined that respondent-mother was entitled to new trial as to all three minor children, as per se conflict of interest existed, because one of the respondent-fathers was represented by attorney who had mediated a prior family court case three years earlier between respondent-father and respondent-mother. Even though attorney had never represented respondent-mother, she was once in a position to access information about her and possibly form opinion as to which parent should have custody of one of the minors, and had taken adversarial position to that of respondent-mother. (O'BRIEN and WRIGHT, concurring.)

House Bill 5614

Topic: 
Educational expenses under the IMDMA
(Sacia, R-Freeport) limits postsecondary educational expenses so that they may not exceed the total amount to attend an Illinois public college or university that provides comparable professional or vocational training sought by the child. Requires that the child must timely apply to all schools reasonably requested by both parents, the child must apply for loans, grants, or any other form of financial assistance for which the child is potentially eligible or qualified, and the duration of awards for educational expenses shall not exceed four years, or such lesser period established by a professional or vocational school for completion of the program. In no event may any third-party beneficiary rights arise with respect to awards for support or educational expenses. Scheduled for House Judiciary Committee I this Wednesday.

House Bill 5663

Topic: 
Domestic violence and mandatory risk assesstment
(Gordon, D-Peoria) amends the bail bond statute to require (now, discretionary) that the court order a defendant to undergo a risk assessment evaluation by the Illinois Department of Human Services if the defendant is charged with an offense for which an action may be commenced against that person under the Illinois Domestic Violence Act (now, is charged with a violation of an order of protection.) Scheduled for hearing this Wednesday in House Judiciary Committee I.