Commercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy

House Bill 188

Topic: 
Objections to jurisdiction over the person

(Thapedi, D-Chicago; Raoul, D-Chicago) amends § 2-301 of the Code of Civil Procedure by changing the exception to the statute’s general rule. The general rule is that a party must object to the court’s jurisdiction (without waiving an objection to the court’s jurisdiction) over the party’s person by filing a motion to dismiss the entire proceeding or by filing a motion to quash service of process, but the party must do this before they file any other pleading.

House Bill 188’s exception to this general rule of waiver allows a motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead or a motion filed under § 2-1301, § 2-1401, and § 2-1401.1

But it requires any motion objecting to the court’s jurisdiction over the party’s person under § 2-301 must be filed within 60 days of the court’s order disposing of the initial motion filed under these three sections. A party may combine these motions without waiving their objection to jurisdiction.

House Bill 188 has passed the House and on third reading in the Senate. 

 

Bowling Green Sports Center, Inc. v. G.A.G. LLC

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Liens
Citation
Case Number: 
2017 IL App (2d) 160656
Decision Date: 
Thursday, April 27, 2017
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
DuPage Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed as modified.
Justice: 
SCHOSTOK

In dispute between senior lender and junior lender, both lenders executed an intercreditor agreement aht provided that junior lender would not sue to recover any money from Defendants until Defendants had repaid senior lender in full.  That agreement also provided that senior lender would not increase its loan to Defendants without first receiving junior lender's consent, but senior lender violated that provision, lending additional $51,000 (1.5%); and junior lender sued senior lender for breach of contract.Because this contract breach minimally impaired junior lender's rights, proper remedy is to deny priority to that amount, and not to subordinate senior lender's entire lien.(JORGENSEN and SPENCE, concurring.)

Aker v. Americollect, Inc.

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 16-3663
Decision Date: 
April 13, 2017
Federal District: 
E.D Wisc.
Holding: 
Affirmed

Dist. Ct. did not err in granting defendants-debt collectors’ motion for summary judgment in action under Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, alleging that defendants’ dunning letters that added five percent interest to their medical debts violated 15 USC section 1692(a)(1) because Wisc. Law allowed creditors to collect said interest (in absence of contractual provision calling for payment of said interest) only if instant debts had been reduced to judgments. Safe-harbor provision contained in Wisc. Statute (section 426.104(4)(b)) allowed defendants to collect said interest, where Wisconsin Administrator had failed to timely object to defendants’ request to collect said interest. As such, defendants’ dunning letters did not constitute false representations about character, amount or legal status of plaintiffs’ debts.

Senate Bill 885

Topic: 
Installment Sales Contract Act

(Koehler, D-Peoria) repeals the Dwelling Structure Contract Act and the Dwelling Unit Installment Contract Act. Creates the Installment Sales Contract Act. Adds provisions governing: definitions; terms and conditions of installment sales contracts; applicability of other Acts; sales of condemned dwelling structures; repairs; account statements; transfer of payments; insurance proceeds; unlawful acts; waivers; and penalties. Makes corresponding changes in the Condominium Property Act. Amends the Code of Civil Procedure. Provides that a real estate installment contract for residential real estate is subject to the foreclosure provisions of the Code if the purchase price is to be paid in installments over a period in excess of one year (instead of five years) and the amount unpaid under the terms of the contract at the time of the filing of the foreclosure complaint, including principal and due and unpaid interest, at the rate prior to default, is less than 90% (instead of 80%) of the original purchase price of the real estate as stated in the contract. Effective January 1, 2018. It is on third reading in the Senate. 

SB 2031

Topic: 
Nursing Home Care Act

 (Tom Cullerton, D-Villa Park) creates a “resident’s representative” under this Act that allows a resident to choose someone to support the resident in decision-making; access medical, social, or other personal information of the resident; manage financial matters; or receive notifications.

It will also include the following: 

(2) A person authorized by State or federal law, including, but not limited to, agents under power of attorney, representative payees, and other fiduciaries, to act on behalf of the resident in order to support the resident in decision-making; access medical, social, or other personal information of the resident; manage financial matters; or receive notifications.

(3) A legal representative, as used in Section 712 of the federal Older Americans Act (42 U.S.C. 3058g); or

(4) The court-appointed guardian or conservator of a resident.

Nothing in this definition is intended to expand the scope of authority of any resident’s representative beyond that authority specifically authorized by the resident, State or federal law, or a court of competent jurisdiction.

 

 

1st Source Bank v. Neto

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
Injunction
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 17-1058
Decision Date: 
March 30, 2017
Federal District: 
N.D. Ind., S. Bend Div.
Holding: 
Motion for emergency issuance of injunction pending appeal denied

Ct. of Appeals denied defendant’s motion seeking issuance of emergency injunction to enjoin plaintiff from proceeding on Brazilian lawsuit regarding plaintiff’s claim that defendant breached contract to make payments on airplane that was located in Brazil, even though defendant claimed that Brazilian lawsuit was “vexatious” because plaintiff had filed similar breach of contract action in Dist. Ct. Injunction was not appropriate where: (1) terms of contract allowed plaintiff to pursue litigation against defendant in Indiana, as well as in court where airplane was located; and (2) defendant had failed to provide sufficient details of Brazilian lawsuit to support his claim that it was identical to instant lawsuit and further failed to explain why he could not seek in Brazil similar stay of plaintiff's lawsuit.

Pantoja v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 15-1567
Decision Date: 
March 29, 2017
Federal District: 
N.D. Ill., E. Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed

Dist. Ct. did not err in granting plaintiff-debtor’s motion for summary judgment in action under Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, alleging that dunning letter sent by defendant-debt collector seeking to collect on debt that was outside applicable limitations period was deceptive under 15 USC section 1692e. Instant letter, which told plaintiff that “because of the age of your debt, we will not sue you for it,” was deceptive because: (1) it did not tell plaintiff that defendant could not sue on instant time-barred debt; and (2) it did not tell plaintiff that if he made or agreed to make partial payment on debt that his debt would be revived.

House Bill 2627

Topic: 
Condominium Property Act

(Fine, D-Glenview) deletes language providing that specified records may be inspected “only for a proper purpose.” Also deletes language that in an action to compel examination of specified records, the burden of proof is upon the member to establish that the member's request is based on a proper purpose. Scheduled for hearing this Thursday in House Judiciary Committee. 

 

House Bill 3150

Topic: 
County recorder and fraudulent filings

(Hurley, D-Chicago) removes a repeal date of June 1, 2018 in a Section concerning a county recorder's ability to establish procedures for investigating filings that would cause the recorder to reasonably believe that the filing may be fraudulent, unlawfully altered, or intended to unlawfully cloud or transfer the title of any real property. On second reading in the House. 

Netzer v. Office of Lawyer Registration

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
Bankruptcy
Citation
Case Number: 
Nos. 16-3236 & 16-3713 Cons.
Decision Date: 
March 13, 2017
Federal District: 
W.D. Wisc.
Holding: 
Affirmed

Dist. Ct. did not err in dismissing as untimely debtor’s appeal of Bankruptcy Ct. order finding that certain debt to Wisconsin’s Office of Lawyer Registration was not dischargeable in bankruptcy, where debtor failed to file notice of appeal within applicable 14-day timeframe for doing so. While Bankruptcy Ct. may allow filing of late notice of appeal if application to file late notice of appeal is filed within 35 days after entry of applicable Bankruptcy Ct order, debtor waited 41 days to file his notice of appeal.