Commercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy

Barnes v. Lolling

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Bankruptcy
Citation
Case Number: 
2017 IL App (3d) 150157
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, June 27, 2017
District: 
3rd. Dist.
Division/County: 
Fulton Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
Holdridge

Plaintiff sued Defendants for personal injuries she sustained during an accident. The accident took place while Plaintiff’s bankruptcy proceeding was pending. Plaintiff did not disclose her potential cause of action to the bankruptcy trustee or schedule the cause of action as an asset of the bankruptcy estate. Plaintiff filed the personal injury claim five months after the bankruptcy court discharged her debts and closed the bankruptcy case. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment alleging Plaintiff’s claim was barred under the doctrine of judicial estoppel, because she failed to disclose the claim during the bankruptcy proceedings, which the Court granted. Court properly granted Defendant’s motion, because all of the prerequisites for judicial estoppel were met. Plaintiff took inconsistent positions by failing to inform the bankruptcy court of her new asset of a personal injury claim, thus representing that no claim existed, and filing the personal injury cause of action. She intended the courts in each proceeding to accept the truth of the facts she alleged. Moreover, she received a benefit from the bankruptcy proceeding by having her unsecured debt discharged without having to increase her payments to her creditors in light of the claim. Additionally, Plaintiff lacked standing to bring the personal injury lawsuit until she moved to reopen the bankruptcy proceeding so that she could schedule the claim as an asset of the bankruptcy estate.

1st Source Bank v. Neto

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
Venue
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 17-1058
Decision Date: 
June 26, 2017
Federal District: 
N.D. Ind., S. Bank Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed

In prosecution on breach of contract action involving contract to purchase airplane, Dist. Ct. did not err in denying defendant’s motion seeking antisuit injunctive relief to prevent plaintiff from proceeding in similar action against defendant in Brazil, where airplane was located. While defendant argued that Brazil litigation was vexatious and duplicative, venue clause in subject contract allowed plaintiff to bring duplicative actions in venue where airplane was located, as well as in instant Dist. Ct. Moreover, Brazil action was not unreasonable, since airplane that could be used to satisfy instant alleged debt was located there. Also, filing of subsequent lawsuit in Brazil was not vexatious, where, at time of filing of Brazil action, plaintiff had subjected defendant in instant action to only one discovery request, one deposition and one mediation.

House Bill 189

Topic: 
Omnibus condo legislation

(Thapedi, D-Chicago; Raoul, D-Chicago) makes numerous changes affecting community associations and condos. Among those changes is the requirement that associations and condos that have 100 or more units to use generally accepted accounting principles in fulfilling their accounting obligations. 

House Bill 189 also changes some parts of the statute governing the examination of a condo association’s records. It authorizes reasonable attorney’s fees and costs to a unit member who prevails in an enforcement action if seeking to examine or copy (1) all contracts to which the association is a party or under which it or the unit owners have obligations; and (2) the books and records for the association’s current fiscal year and the last 10 fiscal years. It also reduces the time in which an association must make these records available from 30 business days to 10 business days or it will be considered a denial of the request.

It also amends the right to examine and copy the ballot and proxy information and current listing of the names, addresses, email addresses, telephone numbers, and weighted vote of all voting members. A member must have a purpose that relates to the association to exercise this right, and the board may ask for the member to so certify. The member may not seek these records for a “commercial purpose” that is defined as use in any form for sale, resale, or solicitation or advertisement for sales or services. House Bill 189 makes it discretionary instead of mandatory on whether the association must charge for the retrieval or copying of these records.

Passed both chambers; effective January 1, 2018 if the Governor signs the bill. 

House Bill 302

Topic: 
Unclaimed Life Insurance Benefits Act

(Martwick, D-Chicago; Collins, D-Chicago) expands last year's original Unclaimed Life Insurance Benefit Act that required insurance companies to perform a check of policies in force (not lapsed) as of January 1, 2017 against the Social Security Death Master File. Insurance companies must now check all policies that are currently in force or were in force as of January 1, 2000, unless the company shows proof that they did not keep electronic records, in which case they must check all current policies and all policies in effect as of January 1, 2012.

Passed both chambers; effective January 1, 2018 if the Governor signs it.

 

Senate Bill 584

Topic: 
Illinois Administrative Procedure Act

(Barickman, R-Bloomington; Andersson, R-Geneva) ensures that the appeals by citizens in administrative review actions are not thrown out of court for a scrivener’s error that is called a “misnomer.” Senate Bill 584 amends the Administrative Procedure Act and the Administrative Review Law to provide a means for correcting good-faith failures to perfectly name necessary parties in actions for administrative review. The proposed legislation would do several things to resolve this problem.

Requires that final administrative orders list all of the parties of record together with their last known address of record. The final order must also include whether there are any agency rules requiring a motion for reconsideration as a part of obtaining a reviewable final administrative decision and, if so, the citation to the rule.  

Prohibits an action for administrative review to be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction based on the misnomer of any agency that is properly served with summons issued in the action within the applicable time limits. It also prohibits dismissal for failure to perfectly name an agent if a timely action of administrative review has been filed that identifies the final administrative decision under review and makes a good faith effort to properly name the administrative agency.

Allows a court to correct misnomers for an erroneous identification of the administrative agency that was made in good faith.

Passed both chambers; effective on the Governor’s signature.  

Senate Bill 885

Topic: 
Installment Sales Contract Act

(Koehler, D-Peoria; Gordon-Booth, D-Peoria) creates the Installment Sales Contract Act. It will require that sales of residential real estate by installment contract conform to the Act. “Residential real estate” means real estate with a dwelling structure excluding property that is sold as a part of a tract of land consisting of four acres or more that is zoned for agricultural purposes.

It applies to sellers that enter into an installment sale contract more than three times during a 12-month period to sell residential real estate. Within ten days of the date of sale the seller must record the contract or a memorandum of the contract with the recorder of deeds. It prohibits the installment sale contract from forbidding the buyer to record the contract or a memorandum of the contract. Makes it a violation of the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act to knowingly violate the Installment Sales Contract.

Passed both chambers; effective January 1, 2018 if signed into law. 

House Bill 188

Topic: 
Objections to jurisdiction over the person

(Thapedi, D-Chicago; Raoul, D-Chicago) amends § 2-301 of the Code of Civil Procedure by changing the exception to the statute’s general rule. The general rule is that a party must object to the court’s jurisdiction (without waiving an objection to the court’s jurisdiction) over the party’s person by filing a motion to dismiss the entire proceeding or by filing a motion to quash service of process, but the party must do this before they file any other pleading.

House Bill 188’s exception to this general rule of waiver allows a motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead or a motion filed under § 2-1301, § 2-1401, and § 2-1401.1

But it requires any motion objecting to the court’s jurisdiction over the party’s person under § 2-301 must be filed within 60 days of the court’s order disposing of the initial motion filed under these three sections. A party may combine these motions without waiving their objection to jurisdiction.

House Bill 188 has passed the House and on third reading in the Senate. 

 

Bowling Green Sports Center, Inc. v. G.A.G. LLC

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Liens
Citation
Case Number: 
2017 IL App (2d) 160656
Decision Date: 
Thursday, April 27, 2017
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
DuPage Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed as modified.
Justice: 
SCHOSTOK

In dispute between senior lender and junior lender, both lenders executed an intercreditor agreement aht provided that junior lender would not sue to recover any money from Defendants until Defendants had repaid senior lender in full.  That agreement also provided that senior lender would not increase its loan to Defendants without first receiving junior lender's consent, but senior lender violated that provision, lending additional $51,000 (1.5%); and junior lender sued senior lender for breach of contract.Because this contract breach minimally impaired junior lender's rights, proper remedy is to deny priority to that amount, and not to subordinate senior lender's entire lien.(JORGENSEN and SPENCE, concurring.)

Aker v. Americollect, Inc.

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 16-3663
Decision Date: 
April 13, 2017
Federal District: 
E.D Wisc.
Holding: 
Affirmed

Dist. Ct. did not err in granting defendants-debt collectors’ motion for summary judgment in action under Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, alleging that defendants’ dunning letters that added five percent interest to their medical debts violated 15 USC section 1692(a)(1) because Wisc. Law allowed creditors to collect said interest (in absence of contractual provision calling for payment of said interest) only if instant debts had been reduced to judgments. Safe-harbor provision contained in Wisc. Statute (section 426.104(4)(b)) allowed defendants to collect said interest, where Wisconsin Administrator had failed to timely object to defendants’ request to collect said interest. As such, defendants’ dunning letters did not constitute false representations about character, amount or legal status of plaintiffs’ debts.

Senate Bill 885

Topic: 
Installment Sales Contract Act

(Koehler, D-Peoria) repeals the Dwelling Structure Contract Act and the Dwelling Unit Installment Contract Act. Creates the Installment Sales Contract Act. Adds provisions governing: definitions; terms and conditions of installment sales contracts; applicability of other Acts; sales of condemned dwelling structures; repairs; account statements; transfer of payments; insurance proceeds; unlawful acts; waivers; and penalties. Makes corresponding changes in the Condominium Property Act. Amends the Code of Civil Procedure. Provides that a real estate installment contract for residential real estate is subject to the foreclosure provisions of the Code if the purchase price is to be paid in installments over a period in excess of one year (instead of five years) and the amount unpaid under the terms of the contract at the time of the filing of the foreclosure complaint, including principal and due and unpaid interest, at the rate prior to default, is less than 90% (instead of 80%) of the original purchase price of the real estate as stated in the contract. Effective January 1, 2018. It is on third reading in the Senate.